Adding false-profile radiographs improves detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip, data from the CHECK cohort

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnac008
J. Herfkens, M. V. van Buuren, N. Riedstra, J. Verhaar, V. Mascarenhas, R. Agricola
{"title":"Adding false-profile radiographs improves detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip, data from the CHECK cohort","authors":"J. Herfkens, M. V. van Buuren, N. Riedstra, J. Verhaar, V. Mascarenhas, R. Agricola","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnac008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine the additional value of the false-profile (FP) view radiograph in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as compared with an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiograph only, and evaluate the correlation between the Wiberg-lateral center edge angle (W-LCEA) and Wiberg-anterior center edge angle (W-ACEA). We used baseline data from a nationwide prospective cohort study (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee). DDH was quantified on AP pelvic and FP hip radiographs using semi-automatic measurements of the W-LCEA and W-ACEA. A threshold of <20° was used to determine DDH for both the W-LCEA and the W-ACEA. The proportion of DDH only present on the FP view determined the FP view additional value. The correlation between the W-LCEA and W-ACEA was determined. In total 720 participants (1391 hips) were included. DDH was present in 74 hips (5.3%), of which 32 were only present on the FP view radiograph (43.2%). The Pearson correlation coefficient between W-LCEA and W-ACEA of all included hips was 0.547 (95% confidence interval: 0.503–0.591) and 0.441 (95% confidence interval: 0.231–0.652) in hips with DDH. A mean difference of 9.4° (SD 8.09) was present between the W-LCEA and the W-ACEA in the hips with DDH. There is a strong additional value of the FP radiograph in the diagnosis of DDH. Over 4 out of 10 (43.2%) individuals’ DDH will be missed when only using the AP radiograph. In hips with DDH a moderate correlation between W-LCEA and W-ACEA was calculated indicating that joints with normal acetabular coverage on the AP view can still be undercovered on the FP view.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"3 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to determine the additional value of the false-profile (FP) view radiograph in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), as compared with an anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiograph only, and evaluate the correlation between the Wiberg-lateral center edge angle (W-LCEA) and Wiberg-anterior center edge angle (W-ACEA). We used baseline data from a nationwide prospective cohort study (Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee). DDH was quantified on AP pelvic and FP hip radiographs using semi-automatic measurements of the W-LCEA and W-ACEA. A threshold of <20° was used to determine DDH for both the W-LCEA and the W-ACEA. The proportion of DDH only present on the FP view determined the FP view additional value. The correlation between the W-LCEA and W-ACEA was determined. In total 720 participants (1391 hips) were included. DDH was present in 74 hips (5.3%), of which 32 were only present on the FP view radiograph (43.2%). The Pearson correlation coefficient between W-LCEA and W-ACEA of all included hips was 0.547 (95% confidence interval: 0.503–0.591) and 0.441 (95% confidence interval: 0.231–0.652) in hips with DDH. A mean difference of 9.4° (SD 8.09) was present between the W-LCEA and the W-ACEA in the hips with DDH. There is a strong additional value of the FP radiograph in the diagnosis of DDH. Over 4 out of 10 (43.2%) individuals’ DDH will be missed when only using the AP radiograph. In hips with DDH a moderate correlation between W-LCEA and W-ACEA was calculated indicating that joints with normal acetabular coverage on the AP view can still be undercovered on the FP view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自CHECK队列的数据显示,添加假轮廓x线片可以提高对髋关节发育不良的检测
本研究的目的是确定假轮廓(FP) x线片在诊断髋关节发育不良(DDH)中的附加价值,与仅骨盆正位(AP) x线片相比,并评估wiberg -外侧中心边缘角(W-LCEA)和wiberg -前中心边缘角(W-ACEA)之间的相关性。我们使用了来自全国前瞻性队列研究(队列髋关节和队列膝关节)的基线数据。通过半自动测量W-LCEA和W-ACEA,在AP骨盆和FP髋关节x线片上量化DDH。采用<20°的阈值来确定W-LCEA和W-ACEA的DDH。DDH只出现在FP视图上的比例决定了FP视图的附加价值。测定W-LCEA与W-ACEA的相关性。共纳入720名参与者(1391髋)。74髋出现DDH(5.3%),其中32髋仅出现在FP片(43.2%)。所有纳入髋部的W-LCEA和W-ACEA的Pearson相关系数分别为0.547(95%可信区间:0.503 ~ 0.591)和0.441(95%可信区间:0.231 ~ 0.652)。DDH髋部W-LCEA和W-ACEA的平均差异为9.4°(SD 8.09)。在DDH的诊断中,FP x线片具有很强的附加价值。当仅使用AP片时,超过4 / 10(43.2%)个体的DDH将被遗漏。在DDH髋部,W-LCEA和W-ACEA之间的相关性计算表明,在AP视图上髋臼覆盖正常的关节在FP视图上仍然可能被遮盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is core decompression and bone marrow concentrate with demineralized bone matrix and platelet-rich fibrin suitable for treating femoral head osteonecrosis? Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire specifically tailored for greater trochanteric pain syndrome for the Dutch population Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery Comparing outcomes of hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of borderline hip dysplasia: a systematic review Hip dysplasia-the Bernese contribution continues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1