Analysis of OCRs measured with SSD and SAD setups; a step to speed up cyberknife commissioning

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1017/S1460396923000195
Muhammad Shahban, Nazia Shahzadi, Saeed Ur Rahman, Muhammad Faheem
{"title":"Analysis of OCRs measured with SSD and SAD setups; a step to speed up cyberknife commissioning","authors":"Muhammad Shahban, Nazia Shahzadi, Saeed Ur Rahman, Muhammad Faheem","doi":"10.1017/S1460396923000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Measurement of off-centre ratios (OCRs) is a requirement for the commissioning of cyberknife. The fixed source to axis distance (SAD) technique is required for the measurement of OCRs which is time-consuming and tedious. The fixed source to surface distance (SSD) technique, on the other hand, is easy to set up and requires less time. The OCRs have been measured with SAD and SSD setup and compared to assess the difference between each other. Material and Methods: The research is carried out on an Accuracy cyberknife M6, installed at NORI Cancer Hospital Islamabad. The OCRs are measured with Sun Nuclear ‘EDGE’ diode detector on a Sun Nuclear SNC 3D dosimetry system. The OCRs were measured for 12 cones and at three depths. Each OCR measured with the SAD setup is compared with the corresponding OCR measured with SSD setup using % dose distance and distance to agreement (2%/0·2mm). Results: For the within-the-beam and out-of-the beam regions, both OCRs are matching with each other. The percentage difference is in the order of less than 1% while the distance-to-agreement results in 100% matching for all cones and all depths. For the penumbra region, the percentage difference is higher than the other two regions. The maximum percentage difference is 2·96%. Generally, the percentage difference is higher for small cones and for OCRs measured at larger depths. Conclusion: The OCRs on a cyberknife system measured with a fixed SSD setup and fixed SAD setup coincide within an acceptable limit and can be measured with both setups with similar accuracy.","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396923000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Measurement of off-centre ratios (OCRs) is a requirement for the commissioning of cyberknife. The fixed source to axis distance (SAD) technique is required for the measurement of OCRs which is time-consuming and tedious. The fixed source to surface distance (SSD) technique, on the other hand, is easy to set up and requires less time. The OCRs have been measured with SAD and SSD setup and compared to assess the difference between each other. Material and Methods: The research is carried out on an Accuracy cyberknife M6, installed at NORI Cancer Hospital Islamabad. The OCRs are measured with Sun Nuclear ‘EDGE’ diode detector on a Sun Nuclear SNC 3D dosimetry system. The OCRs were measured for 12 cones and at three depths. Each OCR measured with the SAD setup is compared with the corresponding OCR measured with SSD setup using % dose distance and distance to agreement (2%/0·2mm). Results: For the within-the-beam and out-of-the beam regions, both OCRs are matching with each other. The percentage difference is in the order of less than 1% while the distance-to-agreement results in 100% matching for all cones and all depths. For the penumbra region, the percentage difference is higher than the other two regions. The maximum percentage difference is 2·96%. Generally, the percentage difference is higher for small cones and for OCRs measured at larger depths. Conclusion: The OCRs on a cyberknife system measured with a fixed SSD setup and fixed SAD setup coincide within an acceptable limit and can be measured with both setups with similar accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用SSD和SAD设置测量的OCR的分析;加快cyberknife调试的一步
摘要简介:偏心率(OCR)的测量是cyberknife调试的一项要求。OCR的测量需要固定源到轴距离(SAD)技术,这是耗时且乏味的。另一方面,固定源到表面距离(SSD)技术易于设置,所需时间较少。OCR已经用SAD和SSD设置进行了测量,并进行了比较,以评估彼此之间的差异。材料和方法:研究是在安装在伊斯兰堡癌症医院的Accuracy Cyberknifer M6上进行的。OCR是用Sun Nuclear SNC 3D剂量测定系统上的Sun Nuclear“EDGE”二极管探测器测量的。在三个深度测量了12个锥体的OCR。将SAD设置测量的每个OCR与SSD设置测量的相应OCR进行比较,使用%剂量距离和一致距离(2%/0.2mm)。结果:对于束内和束外区域,两个OCR彼此匹配。百分比差异在小于1%的数量级,而达到一致的距离导致所有锥体和所有深度100%匹配。对于半影区域,百分比差异高于其他两个区域。最大百分比差异为2.96%。通常,小锥体和在较大深度测量的OCR的百分比差异较大。结论:在cyberknife系统上,用固定SSD设置和固定SAD设置测量的OCR在可接受的范围内一致,并且可以用两种设置以相似的精度测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
期刊最新文献
Wobbling nature of gamma passing rate as a function of calibration field sizes in patient-specific quality assurance Secondary fragmentation and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) study using Bridge SOI microdosimeter: Monte Carlo simulation Keratin-based topical cream for radiation dermatitis during head and neck radiotherapy: a randomised, open-label pilot study. Single catheter 3d volume based hybrid inverse planning optimization in IVBT can improve organ sparing – CORRIGENDUM Dosimetric case study of 3-D FiF vs. VMAT techniques in the treatment of H/N tumour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1