An Institutional Duty to Vote: Applying Role Morality in Representative Democracy

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/00905917231178519
Kevin J. Elliott
{"title":"An Institutional Duty to Vote: Applying Role Morality in Representative Democracy","authors":"Kevin J. Elliott","doi":"10.1177/00905917231178519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is voting a duty of democratic citizenship? This article advances a new argument for the existence of a duty to vote. It argues that every normative account of electoral representation requires universal turnout to function in line with its own internal normative logic. This generates a special obligation for citizens to vote in electoral representative contexts as a function of the role morality of democratic citizenship. Because voting uniquely authorizes office holding in representative democracies, and because universal turnout contributes powerfully to representation being fair, to be a good citizen of such democracies requires one to vote. Whereas previous arguments for a duty to vote have invoked basic moral principles like fairness or a Samaritan duty of rescue, this account is based on citizens occupying a vital functional role within electoral representative institutions. This institutional duty solves the “specificity problem” of justifying a duty to vote better than competing accounts and also immunizes the duty to objections that there is no duty to vote when there are only bad choices and that there is a no duty to vote but rather duty to vote well. By emphasizing the tight connection between institutions and individual conduct, the role morality approach used here supplies a less abstract and more realistic framework than much previous research on the ethics of democratic citizenship and brings the debate closer to constitutive features of democratic politics.","PeriodicalId":47788,"journal":{"name":"Political Theory","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917231178519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Is voting a duty of democratic citizenship? This article advances a new argument for the existence of a duty to vote. It argues that every normative account of electoral representation requires universal turnout to function in line with its own internal normative logic. This generates a special obligation for citizens to vote in electoral representative contexts as a function of the role morality of democratic citizenship. Because voting uniquely authorizes office holding in representative democracies, and because universal turnout contributes powerfully to representation being fair, to be a good citizen of such democracies requires one to vote. Whereas previous arguments for a duty to vote have invoked basic moral principles like fairness or a Samaritan duty of rescue, this account is based on citizens occupying a vital functional role within electoral representative institutions. This institutional duty solves the “specificity problem” of justifying a duty to vote better than competing accounts and also immunizes the duty to objections that there is no duty to vote when there are only bad choices and that there is a no duty to vote but rather duty to vote well. By emphasizing the tight connection between institutions and individual conduct, the role morality approach used here supplies a less abstract and more realistic framework than much previous research on the ethics of democratic citizenship and brings the debate closer to constitutive features of democratic politics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投票的制度义务:角色道德在代议制民主中的应用
投票是民主公民的义务吗?这篇文章为投票义务的存在提出了一个新的论据。它认为,每一种对选举代表制的规范解释都要求普遍投票率符合其内在的规范逻辑。这就产生了公民在选举代表背景下投票的特殊义务,作为民主公民角色道德的功能。因为在代议制民主国家,只有投票才能授权政府任职,又因为普遍的投票率有力地促进了代表制的公平,所以要成为这样的民主国家的好公民,就必须去投票。尽管之前关于投票义务的论点援引了基本的道德原则,如公平或撒玛利亚人的救援义务,但这种说法是基于公民在选举代表机构中扮演着至关重要的职能角色。这种制度性义务比竞争性的解释更好地解决了证明投票义务的“特殊性问题”,也使投票义务免受反对意见的影响,即当只有糟糕的选择时没有投票义务,没有投票义务,但有义务投票好。通过强调制度和个人行为之间的紧密联系,这里使用的角色道德方法提供了一个比之前许多关于民主公民道德的研究更不抽象、更现实的框架,并使辩论更接近民主政治的构成特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Theory
Political Theory POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Political Theory is an international journal of political thought open to contributions from a wide range of methodological, philosophical, and ideological perspectives. Essays in contemporary and historical political thought, normative and cultural theory, history of ideas, and assessments of current work are welcome. The journal encourages essays that address pressing political and ethical issues or events.
期刊最新文献
On the Egalitarian Value of Electoral Democracy Teaching by Examples: Rousseau’s Lawgiver and the Case of Benjamin Franklin In Defense of Shirking in Capitalist Firms: Worker Resistance vs. Managerial Power The Ambiguity of Betrayal: Contesting Myths of Heroic Resistance in South Africa Truth and Loyalty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1