Strategy to Avoid Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Using the Indocyanine Green Fluorescence System

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY International surgery Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00043.1
Jun Higashijima, T. Yoshimoto, Shohei Eto, H. Kashihara, C. Takasu, M. Nishi, T. Tokunaga, K. Yoshikawa, M. Shimada
{"title":"Strategy to Avoid Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Using the Indocyanine Green Fluorescence System","authors":"Jun Higashijima, T. Yoshimoto, Shohei Eto, H. Kashihara, C. Takasu, M. Nishi, T. Tokunaga, K. Yoshikawa, M. Shimada","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00043.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal resections is often caused by insufficient blood flow to the stump. Injecting indocyanine green can help detect blood flow intraoperatively. In this study, we evaluated our original strategy using an indocyanine green fluorescence system to avoid AL.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively evaluated 79 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for colon cancer using a double-stapling technique. Blood flow in oral stumps was evaluated by measuring indocyanine green fluorescence time (FT). We investigated AL cases in detail and analyzed correlations between FT and risk factors for AL.\n \n \n \n Of the 79 patients, 7 (8.9%) developed AL. We divided patients by FTs: >60 seconds, 50 to 60 seconds, and <50 seconds. The AL rates were FT >60 seconds, 60%; FT 50 to 60 seconds, 10.3%; and FT <50 seconds, 2.2%. The AL rate of high-risk cases (with more than 2 risk factors) were calculated and we made our original strategy to avoid AL as the following. Further resection or diverting stomas were needed by the FT >60 seconds group, and by members of the FT 50 to 60 seconds group with ≥3 risk factors. The FT <60 seconds group needed no additional management.\n \n \n \n Patients with delayed FT (>60 seconds, or 50–60 seconds with ≥3 risk factors) may need revision of the anastomosis (diverting stoma or additional resection) to avoid AL. Our original strategy may contribute to reduce AL in colorectal operations.\n","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00043.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) in colorectal resections is often caused by insufficient blood flow to the stump. Injecting indocyanine green can help detect blood flow intraoperatively. In this study, we evaluated our original strategy using an indocyanine green fluorescence system to avoid AL. We retrospectively evaluated 79 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection for colon cancer using a double-stapling technique. Blood flow in oral stumps was evaluated by measuring indocyanine green fluorescence time (FT). We investigated AL cases in detail and analyzed correlations between FT and risk factors for AL. Of the 79 patients, 7 (8.9%) developed AL. We divided patients by FTs: >60 seconds, 50 to 60 seconds, and <50 seconds. The AL rates were FT >60 seconds, 60%; FT 50 to 60 seconds, 10.3%; and FT <50 seconds, 2.2%. The AL rate of high-risk cases (with more than 2 risk factors) were calculated and we made our original strategy to avoid AL as the following. Further resection or diverting stomas were needed by the FT >60 seconds group, and by members of the FT 50 to 60 seconds group with ≥3 risk factors. The FT <60 seconds group needed no additional management. Patients with delayed FT (>60 seconds, or 50–60 seconds with ≥3 risk factors) may need revision of the anastomosis (diverting stoma or additional resection) to avoid AL. Our original strategy may contribute to reduce AL in colorectal operations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用吲哚菁绿荧光系统避免腹腔镜结直肠切除术吻合口漏的策略
吻合口瘘(AL)在结肠直肠切除术通常是由于血流不足的残端引起的。术中注射吲哚菁绿有助于检测血流。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用吲哚菁绿色荧光系统来避免AL的原始策略。我们回顾性评估了79例使用双吻合器技术进行腹腔镜结肠直肠癌切除术的患者。采用吲哚菁绿荧光时间(FT)测定残肢血流。我们对AL病例进行了详细调查,并分析了FT与AL危险因素之间的相关性。79例患者中,7例(8.9%)发生了AL。我们将患者按FT进行分类:60秒,50 - 60秒,60秒,60%;FT 50 ~ 60秒,10.3%;和FT 60秒组,以及FT 50 ~ 60秒组中危险因素≥3的成员。FT 60秒,或50-60秒且危险因素≥3)可能需要修改吻合方式(转移造口或额外切除)以避免AL。我们的原始策略可能有助于减少结直肠手术中的AL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International surgery
International surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field. The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include: -worldwide internet transmission -prompt peer reviews -timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts -even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published. Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Pulmonary Herniation: A Conservative Approach Considerations for Iliac Vein Repair in the Setting of Urologic Procedures Abscess formation of abdominal wall mimicking lymphoma due to Morganella morganii infection in a prepubescent children Application of Kegel Motion Combined with Warming Acupuncture at the Eight Acupuncture Points in Patients with Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy A 270° Retention of Spinal Structure in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis via Posterior-Only Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1