El efecto de los advergames, los banners y el tipo de usuario sobre la actitud hacia la marca y la intención de compra

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.7819/RBGN.V20I2.3784
Pablo C. Farías Nazel
{"title":"El efecto de los advergames, los banners y el tipo de usuario sobre la actitud hacia la marca y la intención de compra","authors":"Pablo C. Farías Nazel","doi":"10.7819/RBGN.V20I2.3784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolPurpose – This research was intended to analyze the effectiveness of advergames in comparison with banners. In addition, it seeks to analyze whether the type of user (someone who just casually browses the Internet vs. someone looking for product information on the Internet) will influence the effectiveness of both Internet advertising formats. Design/methodology/approach – An experiment with 15participants controlling perceived entertainment. Findings – it has been observed that advergames are not superior to banners in improving the attitude towards brand and intention to purchase. These results are independent of the type of user (casual browsers vs. information seekers). Originality/value – While banners are traditional formats in Internet advertising, other formats have emerged as technology advances, such as advergames. portuguesObjetivos – Esta investigacion busca analizar la efectividad de los advergames en comparacion con los banners. Asimismo, se pretende analizar si el tipo de usuario (alguien que solo navega casualmente por Internet vs. alguien que busca informacion del producto en Internet) influira sobre la efectividad de ambos formatos de publicidad en Internet. Metodologia – Un experimento con 152 participantes que controla el entretenimiento percibido. Resultados – Se observa que los advergames no son superiores a los banners a la hora de mejorar la actitud hacia la marca e intencion de compra. Estos resultados son independientes del tipo de usuario (navegadores casuales vs. buscadores de informacion). Contribuciones – Aunque los banners son formatos tradicionales de publicidad en Internet, otros formatos han surgido a medida que avanza la tecnologia, como son los advergames","PeriodicalId":45001,"journal":{"name":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","volume":"20 1","pages":"194-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7819/RBGN.V20I2.3784","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rbgn-Revista Brasileira De Gestao De Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7819/RBGN.V20I2.3784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolPurpose – This research was intended to analyze the effectiveness of advergames in comparison with banners. In addition, it seeks to analyze whether the type of user (someone who just casually browses the Internet vs. someone looking for product information on the Internet) will influence the effectiveness of both Internet advertising formats. Design/methodology/approach – An experiment with 15participants controlling perceived entertainment. Findings – it has been observed that advergames are not superior to banners in improving the attitude towards brand and intention to purchase. These results are independent of the type of user (casual browsers vs. information seekers). Originality/value – While banners are traditional formats in Internet advertising, other formats have emerged as technology advances, such as advergames. portuguesObjetivos – Esta investigacion busca analizar la efectividad de los advergames en comparacion con los banners. Asimismo, se pretende analizar si el tipo de usuario (alguien que solo navega casualmente por Internet vs. alguien que busca informacion del producto en Internet) influira sobre la efectividad de ambos formatos de publicidad en Internet. Metodologia – Un experimento con 152 participantes que controla el entretenimiento percibido. Resultados – Se observa que los advergames no son superiores a los banners a la hora de mejorar la actitud hacia la marca e intencion de compra. Estos resultados son independientes del tipo de usuario (navegadores casuales vs. buscadores de informacion). Contribuciones – Aunque los banners son formatos tradicionales de publicidad en Internet, otros formatos han surgido a medida que avanza la tecnologia, como son los advergames
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advergames、横幅和用户类型对品牌态度和购买意图的影响
espanolPurpose -本研究旨在分析广告游戏与横幅广告的效果。此外,它还试图分析用户类型(只是随便浏览互联网的人与在互联网上寻找产品信息的人)是否会影响两种互联网广告形式的有效性。设计/方法/方法-一个有15名参与者控制感知娱乐的实验。调查结果-据观察,广告游戏在提高消费者对品牌的态度和购买意愿方面并不优于横幅广告。这些结果与用户类型无关(休闲浏览器vs.信息搜索者)。创意/价值——虽然横幅广告是互联网广告的传统形式,但随着技术的进步,其他形式也出现了,比如广告游戏。目的:对广告游戏的有效性进行分析,并与广告横幅进行比较。在此基础上,笔者提出了一种类比的方法,即在互联网上进行有效的信息传播和有效的信息传播,即在互联网上进行有效的信息传播。方法学:一项涉及152名参与者的实验,通过控制和感知来实现。结果:我们观察到的广告游戏没有比广告游戏更好的了,而广告游戏却没有比广告游戏更好的了。Estos的结果是独立于通常情况下的(浏览者与信息者)。贡献-独特的广告形式,传统的互联网广告形式,其他形式的广告形式,新技术的媒体形式,共同的广告游戏
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
16
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perception of organizational justice and home office work performance: influence of affective commitment Testing the contributions of outside directors: should family firms respond differently? Exploring hidden topics on hotel Facebook fan pages before and during the COVID-19 crisis Micro-entrepreneurs in the creative industry: how resilience overcomes the impacts of the pandemic Antecedents and consequences of brand tribes in sports organizations:the role of brand personality dimensions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1