Provinces in Command: Changes in Prefectural Appointments from Hu Jintao to Xi Jinping (2003-2020)

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary China Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1080/10670564.2023.2202629
Xinhui Jiang, Sarah Eaton, Genia Kostka
{"title":"Provinces in Command: Changes in Prefectural Appointments from Hu Jintao to Xi Jinping (2003-2020)","authors":"Xinhui Jiang, Sarah Eaton, Genia Kostka","doi":"10.1080/10670564.2023.2202629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT China’s ‘Xi-Li era’ is said to be defined by both the concentration of power in the center and the strengthening of Party authority. In this paper, we ask whether these trends have been evident in local appointment practices since Xi Jinping took office in 2013. By comparing the career histories of 3,682 prefectural mayors and Party Secretaries under the Hu-Wen and Xi-Li administrations, we find that while appointment practices have shifted, the observed changes are not wholly consistent with the center- and Party-strengthening narratives. First, developments in the Xi-Li era suggest that while provincial authorities are increasingly using prefectural appointments for their own ends, the center remains high and far away in these decisions. Second, we do not find evidence that cadres with a strong Party background have a particular advantage in the Xi period. Instead, cadres with strong track records in key functional xitong, particularly those with an economic profile, are still the most likely to attain leadership positions. These findings contribute to the current debate on the nature of power reconfigurations unfolding in Xi’s China.","PeriodicalId":47894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary China","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2202629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT China’s ‘Xi-Li era’ is said to be defined by both the concentration of power in the center and the strengthening of Party authority. In this paper, we ask whether these trends have been evident in local appointment practices since Xi Jinping took office in 2013. By comparing the career histories of 3,682 prefectural mayors and Party Secretaries under the Hu-Wen and Xi-Li administrations, we find that while appointment practices have shifted, the observed changes are not wholly consistent with the center- and Party-strengthening narratives. First, developments in the Xi-Li era suggest that while provincial authorities are increasingly using prefectural appointments for their own ends, the center remains high and far away in these decisions. Second, we do not find evidence that cadres with a strong Party background have a particular advantage in the Xi period. Instead, cadres with strong track records in key functional xitong, particularly those with an economic profile, are still the most likely to attain leadership positions. These findings contribute to the current debate on the nature of power reconfigurations unfolding in Xi’s China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
据说,中国的“习时代”是由权力集中和党的权威加强两个方面决定的。 通过比较胡温和西丽政府下3682位州长和党委书记的职业历史,我们发现,尽管任命做法发生了变化,但观察到的变化与加强中央和党的说法并不完全一致。首先,西里时代的发展表明,虽然省级当局越来越多地使用州的任命来达到自己的目的,但在这些决定中,中心仍然很高,而且很遥远。第二,我们没有发现证据表明,Xi时期的党性强的干部有特殊优势。相反,在关键职能脱欧方面有着良好记录的干部,特别是那些有经济背景的干部,仍然最有可能获得领导职位。这些发现有助于当前关于Xi领导下的中国权力重组性质的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary China is the only English language journal edited in North America that provides exclusive information about contemporary Chinese affairs for scholars, businessmen and government policy-makers. It publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews. The journal"s fields of interest include economics, political science, law, culture, literature, business, history, international relations, sociology and other social sciences and humanities.
期刊最新文献
Is There a Chinese “Developmental peace”? Evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative’s Impact on Conflict States Can the BRI Deliver High-Quality Development? A Multi-Actor Analysis of China’s Overseas Economic Zones The World Is Grateful to China: Chinese Government Discourse During COVID-19 Australia’s Approach to Chinese Power and Managing Relations with Beijing: The Enduring Paradigm of Liberalism The Quad, AUKUS and Australian Security Minilateralism: China’s Rise and New Approaches to Security Cooperation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1