Occupational Stress among Academicians between Two Selected Universities in Malaysia and Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Kesmas-National Public Health Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.21109/kesmas.v18i3.7052
Nurul Husna Mohd Rusli, S. Anua, Ajeng Tias Endarti, Wan Siti Hajar Wan Mohd Amin, N. Mazlan, Tengku Azmina E Ibrahim
{"title":"Occupational Stress among Academicians between Two Selected Universities in Malaysia and Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study","authors":"Nurul Husna Mohd Rusli, S. Anua, Ajeng Tias Endarti, Wan Siti Hajar Wan Mohd Amin, N. Mazlan, Tengku Azmina E Ibrahim","doi":"10.21109/kesmas.v18i3.7052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational stress has become a major concern for both employees and employers globally. Stress leads to a loss of interest among workers as well as unproductive and valueless outputs if not managed well. The education sector is one work setting dominated by stress. This comparative cross-sectional study aimed to determine the levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among academicians as well as their work-related stressors and coping strategies between a selected public university in Malaysia and a private university in Indonesia. A total of 82 academicians from universities in Malaysia and 52 from Indonesia were recruited using convenience sampling. Data was collected using a validated self-reported questionnaire via Google Forms. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among Malaysian academicians was 19.5%, 29.5%, and 12.2%, respectively. In contrast, the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among Indonesian academicians was 15.7%, 33.3%, and 9.8%. Career development, research, teaching, and interpersonal relationships significantly contributed to stress at both universities (p-value<0.05). Participants from both universities reported using active coping, planning, venting, self-distraction, positive reframing, acceptance, and religion as coping strategies. In conclusion, determining depression, anxiety, and stress prevalence; major work-related stressors; and coping strategies are essential to maintaining the safety, health, and well-being of academicians, which eventually can encourage university administrators to provide support in enhancing their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":43209,"journal":{"name":"Kesmas-National Public Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kesmas-National Public Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v18i3.7052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Occupational stress has become a major concern for both employees and employers globally. Stress leads to a loss of interest among workers as well as unproductive and valueless outputs if not managed well. The education sector is one work setting dominated by stress. This comparative cross-sectional study aimed to determine the levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among academicians as well as their work-related stressors and coping strategies between a selected public university in Malaysia and a private university in Indonesia. A total of 82 academicians from universities in Malaysia and 52 from Indonesia were recruited using convenience sampling. Data was collected using a validated self-reported questionnaire via Google Forms. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among Malaysian academicians was 19.5%, 29.5%, and 12.2%, respectively. In contrast, the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among Indonesian academicians was 15.7%, 33.3%, and 9.8%. Career development, research, teaching, and interpersonal relationships significantly contributed to stress at both universities (p-value<0.05). Participants from both universities reported using active coping, planning, venting, self-distraction, positive reframing, acceptance, and religion as coping strategies. In conclusion, determining depression, anxiety, and stress prevalence; major work-related stressors; and coping strategies are essential to maintaining the safety, health, and well-being of academicians, which eventually can encourage university administrators to provide support in enhancing their quality of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎大流行期间马来西亚和印度尼西亚两所大学院士职业压力的比较研究
职业压力已成为全球员工和雇主关注的主要问题。压力会导致工人失去兴趣,如果管理不善,还会导致生产效率低下和无价值的产出。教育部门是一个充满压力的工作环境。这项横断面比较研究旨在确定马来西亚公立大学和印度尼西亚私立大学院士的抑郁、焦虑和压力水平,以及他们与工作相关的压力源和应对策略。共有82名来自马来西亚大学的院士和52名来自印度尼西亚的院士通过便利抽样进行了招募。数据是通过谷歌表格使用经验证的自我报告问卷收集的。马来西亚院士中抑郁、焦虑和压力的患病率分别为19.5%、29.5%和12.2%。相比之下,印尼院士中抑郁、焦虑和压力的患病率分别为15.7%、33.3%和9.8%。职业发展、研究、教学和人际关系对两所大学的压力有显著影响(p值<0.05),宗教作为应对策略。总之,确定抑郁、焦虑和压力的患病率;与工作相关的主要压力源;应对策略对于维护院士的安全、健康和福祉至关重要,这最终可以鼓励大学管理人员为提高他们的生活质量提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kesmas-National Public Health Journal
Kesmas-National Public Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Guiding patients with traumatic brain injury through the instrumental activities of daily living with the RehaGoal App: a feasibility study. Utilizing Rapid Molecular Tests (RMT/RIF) in Tuberculosis Drug-Sensitive/Resistant Discovery in Indonesia: A Pilot Study Editorial Effects of Early Hospital-Based Palliative Care Consultation on Length of Stay and Costs of Care at Indonesian Tertiary Hospital A Qualitative Exploration of Exclusive Breastfeeding Practices Among Karen Ethnicity Mothers in Northern Thailand Remote Rural Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1