Verbal Fframe-Advance: Toward a Cinematographic Sentence

IF 0.8 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE New Literary History Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1353/nlh.2022.0005
G. Stewart
{"title":"Verbal Fframe-Advance: Toward a Cinematographic Sentence","authors":"G. Stewart","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Eerything here depends on the ways narrative prose can be understood to have its own induced motor functions in matters of pace, juxtaposition, overlap, and recurrence. My goal in moving between media is to locate and specify, in the operations of verbal style, the prose counterpart of cinema's twin frames: the big Frame of the moving screen picture, that is, together (always together) with the little frame of its composite photographic imprints, as those are subject to the traditional understanding of \"frame-advance\" in the spinning past of the celluloid reel in projection. Movies derive at base from the instantaneous replacement of these so-called photograms—and the continuous rearray of their pixel equivalents since—in generating the actual (if invisible) motion on which pictured movement depends. As with syllabic sequence in syntactic perception, within and across sentences, the two scales of screen \"action\" are in fact all but simultaneous—and functionally inseparable. Hence my heuristic coinage for the comparable momentum at stake in each \"time-based\" medium: Fframe-advance.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"53 1","pages":"139 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Eerything here depends on the ways narrative prose can be understood to have its own induced motor functions in matters of pace, juxtaposition, overlap, and recurrence. My goal in moving between media is to locate and specify, in the operations of verbal style, the prose counterpart of cinema's twin frames: the big Frame of the moving screen picture, that is, together (always together) with the little frame of its composite photographic imprints, as those are subject to the traditional understanding of "frame-advance" in the spinning past of the celluloid reel in projection. Movies derive at base from the instantaneous replacement of these so-called photograms—and the continuous rearray of their pixel equivalents since—in generating the actual (if invisible) motion on which pictured movement depends. As with syllabic sequence in syntactic perception, within and across sentences, the two scales of screen "action" are in fact all but simultaneous—and functionally inseparable. Hence my heuristic coinage for the comparable momentum at stake in each "time-based" medium: Fframe-advance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言框架推进:走向一个摄影句子
摘要:这里的每一个都取决于叙事散文在节奏、并置、重叠和重复方面有其诱导的运动功能的理解方式。我在媒体之间移动的目标是,在语言风格的操作中,定位和指定电影双框架的散文对应物:移动屏幕画面的大框架,也就是说,与合成照片印记的小框架在一起(总是在一起),因为这些都受制于在投影中赛璐珞卷轴的旋转过去中对“帧前进”的传统理解。电影的基本来源于这些所谓的照片的即时替换,以及自那以后对其像素等价物的连续重新绘制,从而产生图像运动所依赖的实际(如果不可见的话)运动。与句法感知中的音节序列一样,在句子内部和句子之间,屏幕“动作”的两个尺度实际上几乎是同时的,并且在功能上是不可分割的。因此,我对每种“基于时间的”媒介中的可比动量进行了启发式的推测:Fframe前进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Literary History
New Literary History LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
期刊最新文献
"Let me look again": The Moral Philosophy and Literature Debate at 40 Aesthetic Affairs: Art, Architecture, and the Illusion of Detachment Medieval Futures and the Postwork Romance Idols of the Fragment: Barthes and Critique Metaphorical Figures for Moral Complexity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1