Possibility of Enhancing Digital Health Interoperability in Uganda through FAIR Data

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Intelligence Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.1162/dint_a_00178
Mariam Basajja, Mutwalibi Nambobi, K. Wolstencroft
{"title":"Possibility of Enhancing Digital Health Interoperability in Uganda through FAIR Data","authors":"Mariam Basajja, Mutwalibi Nambobi, K. Wolstencroft","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The digital health landscape in Uganda is plagued by problems with interoperability and sustainability, due to fragmentation and a lack of integrated digital health solutions. This can be partly attributed to the absence of policies on the interoperability of data, as well as the fact that there is no common goal to make digital data and data infrastructure interoperable across the data ecosystem. The promulgation of the FAIR Guidelines in 2016 brought together various data stewards and stakeholders to adopt a common vision on data management and enable greater interoperability. This article explores the potential of enhancing digital health interoperability through FAIR by analysing the digital solutions piloted in Uganda and their sustainability. It looks at the factors that are currently hindering interoperability by examining existing digital health solutions in Uganda, such as the Digital Health Atlas Uganda (DHA-U) and Uganda Digital Health Dashboard (UDHD). The level of FAIRness of the two dashboards was determined using the FAIR Evaluation Services tool. Analysis was also carried out to discover the level of FAIRness of the digital health solutions within the dashboards and the most frequently used software applications and data standards by the different digital health interventions in Uganda.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"4 1","pages":"899-916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The digital health landscape in Uganda is plagued by problems with interoperability and sustainability, due to fragmentation and a lack of integrated digital health solutions. This can be partly attributed to the absence of policies on the interoperability of data, as well as the fact that there is no common goal to make digital data and data infrastructure interoperable across the data ecosystem. The promulgation of the FAIR Guidelines in 2016 brought together various data stewards and stakeholders to adopt a common vision on data management and enable greater interoperability. This article explores the potential of enhancing digital health interoperability through FAIR by analysing the digital solutions piloted in Uganda and their sustainability. It looks at the factors that are currently hindering interoperability by examining existing digital health solutions in Uganda, such as the Digital Health Atlas Uganda (DHA-U) and Uganda Digital Health Dashboard (UDHD). The level of FAIRness of the two dashboards was determined using the FAIR Evaluation Services tool. Analysis was also carried out to discover the level of FAIRness of the digital health solutions within the dashboards and the most frequently used software applications and data standards by the different digital health interventions in Uganda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过FAIR数据增强乌干达数字卫生互操作性的可能性
摘要乌干达的数字健康领域因碎片化和缺乏综合数字健康解决方案而存在互操作性和可持续性问题。这在一定程度上可以归因于缺乏关于数据互操作性的政策,以及没有一个共同的目标来实现数字数据和数据基础设施在整个数据生态系统中的互操作性。FAIR指南于2016年颁布,汇集了各种数据管理员和利益相关者,以采用数据管理的共同愿景,并实现更大的互操作性。本文通过分析乌干达试点的数字解决方案及其可持续性,探讨了通过FAIR增强数字卫生互操作性的潜力。它通过检查乌干达现有的数字健康解决方案,如乌干达数字健康图谱(DHA-U)和乌干达数字健康仪表板(UDHD),来研究目前阻碍互操作性的因素。使用FAIR评估服务工具确定了两个仪表板的FAIRness水平。还进行了分析,以发现仪表盘中数字健康解决方案的公平性水平,以及乌干达不同数字健康干预措施最常用的软件应用程序和数据标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT Rule Mining Trends from 1987 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Classification and quantification of timestamp data quality issues and its impact on data quality outcome BIKAS: Bio-Inspired Knowledge Acquisition and Simulacrum—A Knowledge Database to Support Multifunctional Design Concept Generation Exploring Attentive Siamese LSTM for Low-Resource Text Plagiarism Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1