Role of perfusion index in early detection of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1080/11101849.2023.2208905
Yasser Essam Elfeil, E. Deghidy
{"title":"Role of perfusion index in early detection of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section","authors":"Yasser Essam Elfeil, E. Deghidy","doi":"10.1080/11101849.2023.2208905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The most common drawback of spinal anesthesia (SA) is hypotension, which has adverse effects on both mother and fetus; consequently, early detection and management of spinal hypotension have been considered a very important topic in obstetric anesthesia. Additionally, the capability to ultimately diagnose hypotension could permit initiation of adequate treatment. The standard method to estimate blood pressure during cesarean section is noninvasive blood pressure measurement. However, periods of hypotension could be missed within a reasonable time frame. Methods Perfusion index (PI) and blood pressure were measured in 100 pregnant women during elective cesarean section under SA. Results PI had a significant negative correlation with the change occurred in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (r = −.432, p < .0001); by using univariate linear regression analysis, the PI explains 20.2% of variability in SBP as PI significantly predicts the change occurred in SBP (F = 24.8, p < .0001), as each one unit increase in PI, accompanied by a significant decrease in SBP by 2.089 (mm/hg), as (b, t, p) (−2.089, −4.987, .0001), respectively. There was a significant difference in SBP and PI before and after giving oxytocin bolus [(z = −1.9, P = .05) and (z = −4.3, P < .0001), respectively]. By comparing PI before vs. after taking ephedrine bolus, there was a significant decrease in median of PI [median of PI before 10 (5.5–15) vs. median of PI after 7.5 (6–15.5) (z = −6.6, P < .0001)]. Discussion After SA with sympathetic blockade, peripheral vascular tone declined and therefore PI increased. Conclusion PI could anticipate the incidence of hypotension during cesarean delivery with SA. Ephedrine effect could be evaluated rapidly by the alteration in the PI so that further need can be judged. Oxytocin has a significant impact on vascular tone with 5 international unit bolus, although it does not have a significant effect on blood pressure.","PeriodicalId":11437,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2208905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The most common drawback of spinal anesthesia (SA) is hypotension, which has adverse effects on both mother and fetus; consequently, early detection and management of spinal hypotension have been considered a very important topic in obstetric anesthesia. Additionally, the capability to ultimately diagnose hypotension could permit initiation of adequate treatment. The standard method to estimate blood pressure during cesarean section is noninvasive blood pressure measurement. However, periods of hypotension could be missed within a reasonable time frame. Methods Perfusion index (PI) and blood pressure were measured in 100 pregnant women during elective cesarean section under SA. Results PI had a significant negative correlation with the change occurred in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (r = −.432, p < .0001); by using univariate linear regression analysis, the PI explains 20.2% of variability in SBP as PI significantly predicts the change occurred in SBP (F = 24.8, p < .0001), as each one unit increase in PI, accompanied by a significant decrease in SBP by 2.089 (mm/hg), as (b, t, p) (−2.089, −4.987, .0001), respectively. There was a significant difference in SBP and PI before and after giving oxytocin bolus [(z = −1.9, P = .05) and (z = −4.3, P < .0001), respectively]. By comparing PI before vs. after taking ephedrine bolus, there was a significant decrease in median of PI [median of PI before 10 (5.5–15) vs. median of PI after 7.5 (6–15.5) (z = −6.6, P < .0001)]. Discussion After SA with sympathetic blockade, peripheral vascular tone declined and therefore PI increased. Conclusion PI could anticipate the incidence of hypotension during cesarean delivery with SA. Ephedrine effect could be evaluated rapidly by the alteration in the PI so that further need can be judged. Oxytocin has a significant impact on vascular tone with 5 international unit bolus, although it does not have a significant effect on blood pressure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灌注指数在剖宫产腰麻术后低血压早期检测中的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal levo-bupivacaine versus hyperbaric bupivacaine for inguinal hernia repairs in ex-preterm infants: A double blinded randomized prospective study Comparison of two different methods as reliable predictors of successful caudal block in children Effect of sevoflurane versus propofol on early cognitive functions in elderly patients after lumbar disc surgery Muscle wasting assessed by ultrasound versus scoring systems as early predictor of outcomes of intensive care unit stay in critically ill patients Posterior quadratus lumborum versus caudal epidural block for perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing upper abdominal surgeries: Arandomized, double-blind trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1