Traditional and Modified 5-0-5 Change of Direction Test: Normative and Reliability Analysis

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Strength and Conditioning Journal Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.1519/SSC.0000000000000691
Chloe Ryan, Aaron M. Uthoff, C. McKenzie, John Cronin
{"title":"Traditional and Modified 5-0-5 Change of Direction Test: Normative and Reliability Analysis","authors":"Chloe Ryan, Aaron M. Uthoff, C. McKenzie, John Cronin","doi":"10.1519/SSC.0000000000000691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Change of direction (COD) ability is an important performance factor in many field and court sports. A common COD maneuver is the 180-degree turn, which is commonly assessed through the 5-0-5 COD test. Coaches and practitioners need to assess an athlete's COD performance and have access to normative data for these assessments. This review focuses on the traditional and modified 5-0-5 COD test. The 5-0-5 COD performance results have been gathered across 50 different studies and 11 different sports to create sport, sex, and level specific normative data so performance comparisons can be made, which in turn can drive programming to better effect. The reliability of both the traditional and modified 5-0-5 COD tests has been evaluated and discussed. Traditional COD ability of male athletes is better understood given there were 300 male athletes, compared with 62 female athletes. On average, males were 6.03% faster than females. Elite males were 7.78% faster than subelite and novice males, and subelite females were 3.30% faster than novice female athletes. Further research or collation of normative data is needed on female, youth, and elite cohorts to build more comprehensive databases.","PeriodicalId":21993,"journal":{"name":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"22 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strength and Conditioning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0000000000000691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Change of direction (COD) ability is an important performance factor in many field and court sports. A common COD maneuver is the 180-degree turn, which is commonly assessed through the 5-0-5 COD test. Coaches and practitioners need to assess an athlete's COD performance and have access to normative data for these assessments. This review focuses on the traditional and modified 5-0-5 COD test. The 5-0-5 COD performance results have been gathered across 50 different studies and 11 different sports to create sport, sex, and level specific normative data so performance comparisons can be made, which in turn can drive programming to better effect. The reliability of both the traditional and modified 5-0-5 COD tests has been evaluated and discussed. Traditional COD ability of male athletes is better understood given there were 300 male athletes, compared with 62 female athletes. On average, males were 6.03% faster than females. Elite males were 7.78% faster than subelite and novice males, and subelite females were 3.30% faster than novice female athletes. Further research or collation of normative data is needed on female, youth, and elite cohorts to build more comprehensive databases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统与改进的5-0-5变向试验:规范性与信度分析
在许多场地和球场运动中,变向能力是一个重要的表现因素。一种常见的COD机动是180度转弯,通常通过5-0-5 COD测试进行评估。教练和从业者需要评估运动员的COD表现,并获得这些评估的规范数据。本文着重介绍了传统的和改进的5-0-5 COD试验。5-0-5 COD性能结果是在50项不同的研究和11项不同的运动中收集的,以创建特定运动、性别和级别的标准数据,从而进行性能比较,从而推动编程达到更好的效果。对传统和改进的5-0-5 COD试验的可靠性进行了评估和讨论。考虑到有300名男性运动员,而女性运动员有62名,男性运动员的传统COD能力得到了更好的理解。平均而言,男性比女性快6.03%。精英男性比准精英和新手男性快7.78%,准精英女性比新手女性快3.30%。需要对女性、青年和精英群体的规范性数据进行进一步研究或整理,以建立更全面的数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strength and Conditioning Journal
Strength and Conditioning Journal 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Strength and Conditioning Journal is the professional journal for strength coaches, personal trainers, physical therapists, athletic trainers, and other health professionals working in the strength and conditioning field. The journal’s mission is to publish articles that report both the practical applications of research findings and the knowledge gained by experienced professionals.
期刊最新文献
Types and Contributors to Occupational Fatigue The Use of Global Positioning Systems Devices to Measure Maximum Velocity in Field-Based Team Sport Athletes: A Narrative Review Effect of Using Different Intensities in Resistance Training for Muscle Hypertrophy Gains—A Narrative Review Preparing Basketball Players for Competition During COVID-19 Lockdown: An International Strength and Conditioning Perspective Selection of Key Performance Indicators for Your Sport and Program: Proposing a Complementary Process-Driven Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1