Out of the shadow? Georgia’s emerging strategies of engagement in the Eastern Partnership: between external governance and partnership cooperation

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Caucasus Survey Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218
L. Fix, Andrea Gawrich, Kornely K. Kakachia, Alla Leukavets
{"title":"Out of the shadow? Georgia’s emerging strategies of engagement in the Eastern Partnership: between external governance and partnership cooperation","authors":"L. Fix, Andrea Gawrich, Kornely K. Kakachia, Alla Leukavets","doi":"10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT When the Eastern Partnership (EaP) was launched in 2009, the core motivation was to supplement the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) with an improved eastern dimension. The EaP was conceived to offer more incentives and rewards, thereby shifting the manner of cooperation to more partnership and away from asymmetry. This article analyses the intentions and effects of the EaP in the case of EU-Georgia relations by investigating two modes of cooperation (external governance and partnership cooperation), which should theoretically enhance EU-Georgia relations. The article’s results reveal that a more fine-tuned partnership concept best suits an analysis of Georgia’s participation within the EaP, depending on the policy field of cooperation.","PeriodicalId":37506,"journal":{"name":"Caucasus Survey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caucasus Survey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761199.2018.1541218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT When the Eastern Partnership (EaP) was launched in 2009, the core motivation was to supplement the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) with an improved eastern dimension. The EaP was conceived to offer more incentives and rewards, thereby shifting the manner of cooperation to more partnership and away from asymmetry. This article analyses the intentions and effects of the EaP in the case of EU-Georgia relations by investigating two modes of cooperation (external governance and partnership cooperation), which should theoretically enhance EU-Georgia relations. The article’s results reveal that a more fine-tuned partnership concept best suits an analysis of Georgia’s participation within the EaP, depending on the policy field of cooperation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走出阴影?格鲁吉亚参与东方伙伴关系的新战略:外部治理与伙伴关系合作之间
2009年东方伙伴关系(EaP)启动时,其核心动机是用一个改进的东方维度来补充欧洲邻国政策(ENP)。EaP的设想是提供更多的激励和奖励,从而将合作方式从不对称转变为更多的伙伴关系。本文通过考察欧盟与格鲁吉亚关系中的两种合作模式(外部治理和伙伴合作),分析了欧盟与格鲁吉亚关系中实施欧盟经济伙伴关系的意图和效果。本文的研究结果表明,根据合作的政策领域,一个更精细的伙伴关系概念最适合分析格鲁吉亚参与东亚经济计划的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Caucasus Survey
Caucasus Survey Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Caucasus Survey is a new peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary and independent journal, concerned with the study of the Caucasus – the independent republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, de facto entities in the area and the North Caucasian republics and regions of the Russian Federation. Also covered are issues relating to the Republic of Kalmykia, Crimea, the Cossacks, Nogays, and Caucasian diasporas. Caucasus Survey aims to advance an area studies tradition in the humanities and social sciences about and from the Caucasus, connecting this tradition with core disciplinary concerns in the fields of history, political science, sociology, anthropology, cultural and religious studies, economics, political geography and demography, security, war and peace studies, and social psychology. Research enhancing understanding of the region’s conflicts and relations between the Russian Federation and the Caucasus, internationally and domestically with regard to the North Caucasus, features high in our concerns.
期刊最新文献
Revolution, Covid-19, and War in Armenia: Impacts on Various Forms of Trust Unamuso of Tiflis: Urban Women in Pre-Revolutionary Georgia Capricious States and Betwixt Citizens across the Caucasus Parliamentary Opposition Parties in Georgia’s Foreign Policy under a Hybrid Regime in 2012–2020 Challenges to Building a Viable Alternative to Ethnonationalism in the Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1