Autoethnography: A methodological chat with self

Cemil Egeli
{"title":"Autoethnography: A methodological chat with self","authors":"Cemil Egeli","doi":"10.53841/bpscpr.2017.32.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is paucity of counselling psychology literature which explores the experience of people coming from a mixed cultural background. The literature available focuses on developmental theories and cultural competencies of practitioners but all too often fails to capture the peculiarities and particularities of the mixed experience. It also has a tendency to focus on ethnic, racial and cultural labels which are not always useful or helpful for people.This paper explores autoethnography as a methodology with which to research the mixed cultural experience. It aims to highlight the importance for the counselling psychology professions of reflexive and subjective research with regards to studying and understanding people’s experiences of mixed culture.It examines the methods and processes used by a researcher in the data gathering, analysis and explication of their own subjective research. It reveals some of the difficulties encountered and ethical decisions which had to be made during the research. In keeping with the ethnographic and creative approach it is written as a self-diaologue and hopes to give the reader a sense of how the research was undertaken.It concludes that autoethnography can highlight the complexities of the experience of people operating between or on the edge of cultures and can bring greater understanding and awareness to counselling professionals who will then hopefully be better enabled to help people.","PeriodicalId":36758,"journal":{"name":"Counselling Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2017.32.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

There is paucity of counselling psychology literature which explores the experience of people coming from a mixed cultural background. The literature available focuses on developmental theories and cultural competencies of practitioners but all too often fails to capture the peculiarities and particularities of the mixed experience. It also has a tendency to focus on ethnic, racial and cultural labels which are not always useful or helpful for people.This paper explores autoethnography as a methodology with which to research the mixed cultural experience. It aims to highlight the importance for the counselling psychology professions of reflexive and subjective research with regards to studying and understanding people’s experiences of mixed culture.It examines the methods and processes used by a researcher in the data gathering, analysis and explication of their own subjective research. It reveals some of the difficulties encountered and ethical decisions which had to be made during the research. In keeping with the ethnographic and creative approach it is written as a self-diaologue and hopes to give the reader a sense of how the research was undertaken.It concludes that autoethnography can highlight the complexities of the experience of people operating between or on the edge of cultures and can bring greater understanding and awareness to counselling professionals who will then hopefully be better enabled to help people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我民族志:与自我的方法论对话
咨询心理学文献很少探讨来自不同文化背景的人的经历。现有的文献侧重于发展理论和从业者的文化能力,但往往未能捕捉到混合经验的特点和特殊性。它也倾向于关注民族、种族和文化标签,这些标签对人们并不总是有用或有益的。本文探讨了自我民族志作为一种研究混合文化经验的方法。它旨在强调反思性和主观性研究对于研究和理解人们在混合文化中的经历对于咨询心理学专业的重要性。它检查了研究人员在数据收集,分析和解释自己的主观研究中使用的方法和过程。它揭示了在研究过程中遇到的一些困难和必须做出的伦理决定。为了与民族志和创造性的方法保持一致,它是以自我对话的形式写成的,希望能让读者了解这项研究是如何进行的。它的结论是,自我民族志可以突出人们在文化之间或边缘运作的经验的复杂性,可以给咨询专业人员带来更多的理解和意识,他们将有希望更好地帮助人们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling Psychology Review
Counselling Psychology Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mental health difficulties in paramedics: A review of the literature Structural Existential Analysis (SEA) – A step-by-step guide for application to research Supervising trainee counselling psychologists of colour in doctoral research: A theoretical review and practice implications ‘You can’t live like I did and grow up normal’: An IPA study of how men diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experienced their early childhood The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on self-efficacy in Assistant Psychologists in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1