Current state of female pediatric urologists at Societies for Pediatric Urology fellowship accredited programs

Natalie Armon, Nora Thompson, D. DaJusta, M. Fuchs, C. Ching
{"title":"Current state of female pediatric urologists at Societies for Pediatric Urology fellowship accredited programs","authors":"Natalie Armon, Nora Thompson, D. DaJusta, M. Fuchs, C. Ching","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2023.1104597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Gender inequities in medicine exist. Urology is a male dominated surgical specialty, with recent census data showing females represent only 10.9% of the workforce. We aimed to characterize the composition of female pediatric urologists across the Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) pediatric urology fellowship accredited programs, with particular attention to academic promotion and leadership positions. Methods In January 2023, we reviewed the official websites of the 27 pediatric urology programs listed on the SPU website as fellowship accredited programs. We identified pediatric urology surgery attendings, their gender, academic title, and if they were named a director of an internal program or had a hospital leadership position. We identified the program chief and fellow/resident program director. This data was associated with years in practice. Results Females represented 27.4% of pediatric urology surgical attendings. Four programs (14.8%) had no female attendings. Female staff were in practice a median shorter time than that of males (6 vs. 16 years, p<0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of females were assistant professors (62.2 vs. 35.2%; p=0.0041) while a significantly higher proportion of men were professors (37.0 vs. 18.9%; p=0.0421). Only one program (3.7%) had a female department/division chief. There was no difference between genders regarding being named a director of a program and/or having an identified hospital position of leadership. Female professors had been in practice a significantly shorter time than male professors (p=0.0003); women with an internal or hospital leadership position had also been in practice a significantly shorter time than males (p<0.001). Conclusions Females are represented more in SPU pediatric urology fellowship accredited programs than the overall urology workforce. Fewer female attendings are professors compared to male attendings; however, differences in promotion could be impacted by female attendings being earlier in their career. Hopefully with time, we will see more equal representation amongst genders in pediatric urology programs overall, but especially where we are training the next generation.","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2023.1104597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Gender inequities in medicine exist. Urology is a male dominated surgical specialty, with recent census data showing females represent only 10.9% of the workforce. We aimed to characterize the composition of female pediatric urologists across the Societies for Pediatric Urology (SPU) pediatric urology fellowship accredited programs, with particular attention to academic promotion and leadership positions. Methods In January 2023, we reviewed the official websites of the 27 pediatric urology programs listed on the SPU website as fellowship accredited programs. We identified pediatric urology surgery attendings, their gender, academic title, and if they were named a director of an internal program or had a hospital leadership position. We identified the program chief and fellow/resident program director. This data was associated with years in practice. Results Females represented 27.4% of pediatric urology surgical attendings. Four programs (14.8%) had no female attendings. Female staff were in practice a median shorter time than that of males (6 vs. 16 years, p<0.0001). A significantly higher proportion of females were assistant professors (62.2 vs. 35.2%; p=0.0041) while a significantly higher proportion of men were professors (37.0 vs. 18.9%; p=0.0421). Only one program (3.7%) had a female department/division chief. There was no difference between genders regarding being named a director of a program and/or having an identified hospital position of leadership. Female professors had been in practice a significantly shorter time than male professors (p=0.0003); women with an internal or hospital leadership position had also been in practice a significantly shorter time than males (p<0.001). Conclusions Females are represented more in SPU pediatric urology fellowship accredited programs than the overall urology workforce. Fewer female attendings are professors compared to male attendings; however, differences in promotion could be impacted by female attendings being earlier in their career. Hopefully with time, we will see more equal representation amongst genders in pediatric urology programs overall, but especially where we are training the next generation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性儿科泌尿科医师在儿科泌尿科协会认证项目的现状
医学领域存在性别不平等。泌尿外科是男性主导的外科专业,最近的人口普查数据显示,女性仅占劳动力的10.9%。我们的目的是描述儿科泌尿外科学会(SPU)儿科泌尿外科奖学金认证项目的女性儿科泌尿科医生的组成,特别关注学术晋升和领导职位。方法于2023年1月,我们对SPU网站上列出的27个儿科泌尿外科专业的官方网站进行了审查。我们确定了儿科泌尿外科主治医师,他们的性别,学术头衔,以及他们是否被任命为内部项目主任或担任医院领导职务。我们确定了项目主管和实习项目主管。这些数据与多年的实践有关。结果女性占儿科泌尿外科主治医师的27.4%。4个项目(14.8%)没有女性主治医师。女性工作人员的实习时间中位数短于男性(6年vs. 16年,p<0.0001)。女性助理教授的比例(62.2比35.2%;P =0.0041),而男性担任教授的比例明显更高(37.0比18.9%;p = 0.0421)。只有一个项目(3.7%)的部门/部门主管是女性。在被任命为项目主任和/或在医院担任领导职务方面,性别之间没有差异。女教授的在职时间明显短于男教授(p=0.0003);担任内部或医院领导职务的女性的实习时间也明显短于男性(p<0.001)。结论SPU儿科泌尿外科奖学金认证项目中女性的比例高于整体泌尿外科工作人员。与男性主治医生相比,担任教授的女性主治医生更少;然而,晋升的差异可能受到女性主治医生职业生涯早期的影响。希望随着时间的推移,我们能在整个儿科泌尿科项目中看到更多性别平等的代表,尤其是在我们培养下一代的项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing time from presentation to surgical intervention for testicular torsion: implementation of a quality improvement protocol Clinical and environmental considerations for neonatal, office-based circumcisions compared with operative circumcisions Case report: Para-testicular spindle cell lipoma suspected of well-differentiated liposarcoma Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage Long-term follow-up results of prostate capsule-sparing and nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with neobladder: a single-center retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1