Performance Comparison of Open Source and Commercial Computing Tools in Educational andOther Use — Scilab vs. MATLAB

IF 0.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2022-09-26 DOI:10.31803/tg-20220528171032
M. Mikac, Robert Logožar, M. Horvatić
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Open Source and Commercial Computing Tools in Educational andOther Use — Scilab vs. MATLAB","authors":"M. Mikac, Robert Logožar, M. Horvatić","doi":"10.31803/tg-20220528171032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the authors compare the features and the overall performance of the two high-level numerical computing and modeling software environments: the freeware Scilab and commercially available industry-standard MATLAB. The motivation for the work emanated from the educational use of these tools at the college and university level, but with a perspective to their professional and scientific use as well. Their performance is tested by measuring the execution times of several combined-task benchmarks implemented as test functions, built upon nine common numerical tasks that are often found in programs for solving standard engineering problems. They include basic algebra and matrix calculations, signal generation, signal analysis, and storing and retrieving data to and from the hard disk drive. Although MATLAB outperforms Scilab in all the benchmarks except the disk file manipulations, in the presumed vectorization versions of the benchmarks, it is not for much. The overall performance of the freeware rival is very satisfactory, making it a good choice not only for educational use but also for scientific and professional purposes, especially when funding is critical.","PeriodicalId":43419,"journal":{"name":"TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20220528171032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, the authors compare the features and the overall performance of the two high-level numerical computing and modeling software environments: the freeware Scilab and commercially available industry-standard MATLAB. The motivation for the work emanated from the educational use of these tools at the college and university level, but with a perspective to their professional and scientific use as well. Their performance is tested by measuring the execution times of several combined-task benchmarks implemented as test functions, built upon nine common numerical tasks that are often found in programs for solving standard engineering problems. They include basic algebra and matrix calculations, signal generation, signal analysis, and storing and retrieving data to and from the hard disk drive. Although MATLAB outperforms Scilab in all the benchmarks except the disk file manipulations, in the presumed vectorization versions of the benchmarks, it is not for much. The overall performance of the freeware rival is very satisfactory, making it a good choice not only for educational use but also for scientific and professional purposes, especially when funding is critical.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开源和商业计算工具在教育和其他用途中的性能比较——Scilab与MATLAB
在本文中,作者比较了两种高级数值计算和建模软件环境的特点和整体性能:免费软件Scilab和商用工业标准MATLAB。这项工作的动机来自这些工具在学院和大学水平的教育使用,但也有他们的专业和科学使用的观点。通过测量作为测试函数实现的几个组合任务基准的执行时间来测试它们的性能,这些基准构建在解决标准工程问题的程序中经常发现的9个常见数值任务上。它们包括基本的代数和矩阵计算,信号生成,信号分析,以及从硬盘驱动器存储和检索数据。尽管MATLAB在除磁盘文件操作之外的所有基准测试中都优于Scilab,但在假定的向量化版本的基准测试中,它并没有太多优势。这款免费软件的整体表现非常令人满意,不仅是教育用途,也是科学和专业用途的好选择,尤其是在资金至关重要的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL
TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
85
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Standardization of Project Management Practices of Automotive Industry Suppliers Technical Characteristics of Incunabulum in Europe Face Detection and Recognition Using Raspberry PI Computer A Returnable Transport Item to Integrate Logistics 4.0 and Circular Economy in Pharma Supply Chains Modelling Freight Allocation and Transportation Lead-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1