{"title":"Releasing Life or Releasing Death: The Practice of and Discourse on Buddhist Animal Liberation Rituals in Contemporary Xiamen","authors":"A. Darshani","doi":"10.1353/jcr.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The ritual of “releasing life” (fangsheng 放生), a form of Buddhist cultivation, has been widely practiced by Chinese Buddhists for at least fifteen centuries. This ritual is currently enjoying immense popularity among devotees in mainland China and within Chinese societies around the world. Yet the ubiquity of fangsheng in China has elicited sharp criticism from various societal sectors, including the government, the media, Buddhist institutions, animal advocates, and environmentalists. After outlining the main historical milestones of the practice, this article examines two lay Buddhist groups that are part of a larger fangsheng network and regularly engage in releasing life in contemporary Xiamen 廈門, Fujian 福建 province. It then describes the national Buddhist leadership’s condemnation of “indiscriminate” fangsheng rituals as well as attempts to regulate on the part of the state, which have culminated in an orchestrated campaign for “Rational Releasing of Life.” In addition, focusing on fangsheng on a local level, the article explores the steps taken by Buddhist establishment actors in Xiamen to promote this new, rational concept alongside lay groups’ apologetics in light of the growing criticism of the practice.摘要:放生儀式作為一種佛教修行方式,至少已被中國佛教徒實踐了1500年。在當代中國大陸以及海外華人社會的信徒中,这一儀式普遍流行。然而在中國,放生儀式的流行引發社會各階層的尖銳批評,其中包括政府、媒體、佛教機構、動物保護人士以及環保主義者。本文首先勾勒放生實踐的主要歷史發展,其次從更大的放生儀式網絡考察兩個在當代福建廈門經常舉行放生儀式的佛教居士組織。接著描述中國佛教協會對「隨意」放生儀式的譴責,以及試圖將國家推行的「合理放生」運動規範化。此外,透過聚焦於地方層面的放生,本文探討廈門的叢林寺院為推廣上述新式合理放生活動所採取的措施,以及在受到越來越多批評的環境下,居士群體對此儀式實踐所做的辯護。","PeriodicalId":53120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Religions","volume":"49 1","pages":"109 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Abstract:The ritual of “releasing life” (fangsheng 放生), a form of Buddhist cultivation, has been widely practiced by Chinese Buddhists for at least fifteen centuries. This ritual is currently enjoying immense popularity among devotees in mainland China and within Chinese societies around the world. Yet the ubiquity of fangsheng in China has elicited sharp criticism from various societal sectors, including the government, the media, Buddhist institutions, animal advocates, and environmentalists. After outlining the main historical milestones of the practice, this article examines two lay Buddhist groups that are part of a larger fangsheng network and regularly engage in releasing life in contemporary Xiamen 廈門, Fujian 福建 province. It then describes the national Buddhist leadership’s condemnation of “indiscriminate” fangsheng rituals as well as attempts to regulate on the part of the state, which have culminated in an orchestrated campaign for “Rational Releasing of Life.” In addition, focusing on fangsheng on a local level, the article explores the steps taken by Buddhist establishment actors in Xiamen to promote this new, rational concept alongside lay groups’ apologetics in light of the growing criticism of the practice.摘要:放生儀式作為一種佛教修行方式,至少已被中國佛教徒實踐了1500年。在當代中國大陸以及海外華人社會的信徒中,这一儀式普遍流行。然而在中國,放生儀式的流行引發社會各階層的尖銳批評,其中包括政府、媒體、佛教機構、動物保護人士以及環保主義者。本文首先勾勒放生實踐的主要歷史發展,其次從更大的放生儀式網絡考察兩個在當代福建廈門經常舉行放生儀式的佛教居士組織。接著描述中國佛教協會對「隨意」放生儀式的譴責,以及試圖將國家推行的「合理放生」運動規範化。此外,透過聚焦於地方層面的放生,本文探討廈門的叢林寺院為推廣上述新式合理放生活動所採取的措施,以及在受到越來越多批評的環境下,居士群體對此儀式實踐所做的辯護。
Abstract:The ritual of“releasing life”(fangsheng放生),a form of Buddhist cultivation,has been widely practiced by Chinese Buddhists for at least fifteen centuries.This ritual is currently enjoying immense popularity among devotees in mainland China and within Chinese societies around the world.Yet the ubiquity of fangsheng in China has elicited sharp criticism from various societal sectors,including the government,the media,Buddhist institutions,animal advocates,and environmentalists.After outlining the main historical milestones of the practice,this article examines two lay Buddhist groups that are part of a larger fangsheng network and regularly engage in releasing life in contemporary Xiamen厦门,Fujian福建province.It then describes the national Buddhist leadership’s condemnation of“indiscriminate”fangsheng rituals as well as attempts to regulate on the part of the state,which have culminated in an orchestrated campaign for“Rational Releasing of Life.”In addition,focusing on fangsheng on a local level,the article explores the steps taken by Buddhist establishment actors in Xiamen to promote this new,rational concept alongside lay groups’apologetics in light of the growing criticism of the practice.摘要:放生仪式作为一种佛教修行方式,至少已被中国佛教徒实践了1500年。在当代中国大陆以及海外华人社会的信徒中,这一仪式普遍流行。然而在中国,放生仪式的流行引发社会各阶层的尖锐批评,其中包括政府、媒体、佛教机构、动物保护人士以及环保主义者。本文首先勾勒放生实践的主要历史发展,其次从更大的放生仪式网络考察两个在当代福建厦门经常举行放生仪式的佛教居士组织。接着描述中国佛教协会对「随意」放生仪式的谴责,以及试图将国家推行的「合理放生」运动规范化。此外,透过聚焦于地方层面的放生,本文探讨厦门的丛林寺院为推广上述新式合理放生活动所采取的措施,以及在受到越来越多批评的环境下,居士群体对此仪式实践所做的辩护。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chinese Religions is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published under the auspices of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions (SSCR). Since its founding, the Journal has provided a forum for studies in Chinese religions from a great variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philology, history, art history, anthropology, sociology, political science, archaeology, and literary studies. The Journal welcomes original research articles, shorter research notes, essays, and field reports on all aspects of Chinese religions in all historical periods. All submissions need to undergo double-blind peer review before they can be accepted for publication.