Screen monopoly and diversity: a comparative study between the Korean and French film industries

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Trends Pub Date : 2022-06-18 DOI:10.1080/09548963.2022.2082864
Jimmyn Parc, P. Messerlin
{"title":"Screen monopoly and diversity: a comparative study between the Korean and French film industries","authors":"Jimmyn Parc, P. Messerlin","doi":"10.1080/09548963.2022.2082864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, there have been many voices in Korea arguing that a few commercially successful fi lms take up the opportunities for the exhibition of other fi lms and thus limit the selection of titles available for moviegoers, a trend dubbed the “ screen monopoly ” . In seeking a solution, a number of scholars have looked to the anti-screen monopoly “ regulations ” in France, but without providing rigorous or persuasive evidence. By comparing the appropriate variables of Korea and France, this paper argues that the Korean fi lm market is less monopolised than France despite the non-existence of these regulations. Furthermore, it demonstrates that Korea has more diversity than France. As a result, this paper concludes that introducing the French anti-screen monopoly regulations in Korea does not seem a bene fi cial option. The fi ndings in this paper suggest a strong need to re-examine the e ff ectiveness of government policies in the cultural industry.","PeriodicalId":51682,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Trends","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Trends","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2082864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recent years, there have been many voices in Korea arguing that a few commercially successful fi lms take up the opportunities for the exhibition of other fi lms and thus limit the selection of titles available for moviegoers, a trend dubbed the “ screen monopoly ” . In seeking a solution, a number of scholars have looked to the anti-screen monopoly “ regulations ” in France, but without providing rigorous or persuasive evidence. By comparing the appropriate variables of Korea and France, this paper argues that the Korean fi lm market is less monopolised than France despite the non-existence of these regulations. Furthermore, it demonstrates that Korea has more diversity than France. As a result, this paper concludes that introducing the French anti-screen monopoly regulations in Korea does not seem a bene fi cial option. The fi ndings in this paper suggest a strong need to re-examine the e ff ectiveness of government policies in the cultural industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银幕垄断与多样性:韩国与法国电影产业的比较研究
近年来,韩国有很多声音认为,少数商业上成功的电影占用了其他电影的放映机会,从而限制了电影观众的选择,这种趋势被称为“银幕垄断”。在寻求解决方案的过程中,一些学者将目光投向了法国的反屏幕垄断“法规”,但没有提供严谨或有说服力的证据。通过比较韩国和法国的适当变量,本文认为,尽管没有这些规定,但韩国电影市场的垄断程度不如法国。此外,这也表明韩国比法国更具多样性。因此,本文的结论是,在韩国引入法国的反屏幕垄断规定似乎不是一个有益的选择。本文的研究结果表明,有必要重新审视政府政策在文化产业中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Trends
Cultural Trends Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Mind the gap: causes and consequences of the racial gap in music funding organizations The role of cultural organisations in matters of equity, diversity, and inclusion Creating growth: labour’s plan for the arts, culture and creative industries Fashion as Creative Economy Cultural Leadership in Practice: Beyond Arts Management and Cultural Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1