ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Aviation Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.3846/aviation.2021.15837
Neelakshi Majumdar, Karen B. Marais, Arjun H. Rao
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF GENERAL AVIATION FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS INVOLVING INFLIGHT LOSS OF CONTROL USING A STATE-BASED APPROACH","authors":"Neelakshi Majumdar, Karen B. Marais, Arjun H. Rao","doi":"10.3846/aviation.2021.15837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source of accident data, but conventional analyses of the database yield limited insights to LOC-I. We investigate the causes of 5,726 LOC-I fixed‑wing GA aircraft accidents in the United States in 1999–2008 and 2009–2017 using a state-based modeling approach. The multi-year analysis helps discern changes in causation trends over the last two decades. Our analysis highlights LOC-I causes such as pilot actions and mechanical issues that were not discernible in previous research efforts. The logic rules in the state-based approach help infer missing information from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) accident reports. We inferred that 4.84% (1999–2008) and 7.46% (2009–2017) of LOC-I accidents involved a preflight hazardous aircraft condition. We also inferred that 20.11% (1999–2008) and 19.59% (2009–2017) of LOC-I accidents happened because the aircraft hit an object or terrain. By removing redundant coding and identifying when codes are missing, the state-based approach potentially provides a more consistent way of coding accidents compared to the current coding system.","PeriodicalId":51910,"journal":{"name":"Aviation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2021.15837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Inflight loss of control (LOC-I) is a significant cause of General Aviation (GA) fixed-wing aircraft accidents. The United States National Transportation Safety Board’s database provides a rich source of accident data, but conventional analyses of the database yield limited insights to LOC-I. We investigate the causes of 5,726 LOC-I fixed‑wing GA aircraft accidents in the United States in 1999–2008 and 2009–2017 using a state-based modeling approach. The multi-year analysis helps discern changes in causation trends over the last two decades. Our analysis highlights LOC-I causes such as pilot actions and mechanical issues that were not discernible in previous research efforts. The logic rules in the state-based approach help infer missing information from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) accident reports. We inferred that 4.84% (1999–2008) and 7.46% (2009–2017) of LOC-I accidents involved a preflight hazardous aircraft condition. We also inferred that 20.11% (1999–2008) and 19.59% (2009–2017) of LOC-I accidents happened because the aircraft hit an object or terrain. By removing redundant coding and identifying when codes are missing, the state-based approach potentially provides a more consistent way of coding accidents compared to the current coding system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于状态方法的飞行失控通用航空固定翼飞机事故分析
机上失控(LOC-I)是通用航空(GA)固定翼飞机事故的重要原因。美国国家运输安全委员会的数据库提供了丰富的事故数据来源,但传统的数据库分析对LOC-I的了解有限。我们使用基于状态的建模方法调查了1999-2008年和2009-2017年美国5726架LOC-I固定翼GA飞机事故的原因。多年分析有助于辨别过去二十年因果关系趋势的变化。我们的分析强调了LOC-I的原因,如飞行员的行为和机械问题,这些在以前的研究工作中是不可识别的。基于州的方法中的逻辑规则有助于从美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)的事故报告中推断出缺失的信息。我们推断,4.84%(1999-2008年)和7.46%(2009-2017年)的LOC-I事故涉及飞行前危险的飞机状况。我们还推断,20.11%(1999-2008年)和19.59%(2009-2017年)的LOC-I事故是由于飞机撞上物体或地形而发生的。与当前的编码系统相比,通过消除冗余编码并识别代码缺失的时间,基于状态的方法可能提供一种更一致的事故编码方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation
Aviation ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: ▪ Flight Physics ▪ Air Traffic Management ▪ Aerostructures ▪ Airports ▪ Propulsion ▪ Human Factors ▪ Aircraft Avionics, Systems and Equipment ▪ Air Transport Technologies and Development ▪ Flight Mechanics ▪ History of Aviation ▪ Integrated Design and Validation (method and tools) Besides, it publishes: short reports and notes, reviews, reports about conferences and workshops
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION OF LOADS IN THE ULTRALIGHT HELICOPTER BLADES RATIONAL CONTROL BY TEMPERATURE IN VORTEX ENERGY SEPARATOR UNDER DESTABILIZING EFFECTS CUSTOMER-FOCUSED AIRCRAFT SEAT DESIGN: A CASE STUDY WITH AHP-QFD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND HAZARDS IN THE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE INDUSTRY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION STUDY OF A PASSIVE SAFETY FEATURE IN THE RESCUE SYSTEMS OF SMALL AIRCRAFTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1