Teachers’ opinions about elitism in gifted education

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Education Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.15700/saje.v42ns1a2171
B. Radulović
{"title":"Teachers’ opinions about elitism in gifted education","authors":"B. Radulović","doi":"10.15700/saje.v42ns1a2171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although teachers’ attitudes towards gifted students and gifted education have been monitored more intensively since the 1990s, we still do not have a clear and definitive picture. Therefore, with the research reported on here we examined teachers’ opinions about the connection between gifted education and elitism and how they viewed the need for grouping gifted students. The sample consisted of 432 primary and secondary school teachers. The main results show teachers’ neutral opinions towards the grouping of gifted students and the correlation to elitism. Significant differences were obtained in the teachers’ opinions for demographic characteristics, i.e. the school type (primary or secondary) and the school location (urban or rural). The results are in line with the general idea that education should be accessible to everyone according to their abilities in order to overcome equating gifted education with the rich elite.","PeriodicalId":47261,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42ns1a2171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although teachers’ attitudes towards gifted students and gifted education have been monitored more intensively since the 1990s, we still do not have a clear and definitive picture. Therefore, with the research reported on here we examined teachers’ opinions about the connection between gifted education and elitism and how they viewed the need for grouping gifted students. The sample consisted of 432 primary and secondary school teachers. The main results show teachers’ neutral opinions towards the grouping of gifted students and the correlation to elitism. Significant differences were obtained in the teachers’ opinions for demographic characteristics, i.e. the school type (primary or secondary) and the school location (urban or rural). The results are in line with the general idea that education should be accessible to everyone according to their abilities in order to overcome equating gifted education with the rich elite.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
资优教育中教师对精英主义的看法
虽然自20世纪90年代以来,我们对教师对资优学生和资优教育的态度进行了更深入的监测,但我们仍然没有一个清晰和明确的图景。因此,根据本文的研究报告,我们调查了教师对资优教育与精英主义之间关系的看法,以及他们如何看待将资优学生分组的必要性。样本包括432名中小学教师。主要结果显示,教师对资优学生分组持中立态度,并与精英主义存在相关性。教师对人口统计学特征(即学校类型(小学或中学)和学校位置(城市或农村)的看法存在显著差异。这一结果符合这样一种普遍观点,即每个人都应该根据自己的能力接受教育,以克服将天才教育与富有的精英教育等同起来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Education
South African Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Education (SAJE) publishes original research articles reporting on research that fulfils the criteria of a generally accepted research paradigm; review articles, intended for the professional scientist and which critically evaluate the research done in a specific field in education; book reviews, i.e. concise evaluations of books that have recently appeared; and letters in which criticism is given of articles that appeared in this Journal. Indicate the relevance of the study for education research where the education system is characterised by transformation, and/or an emerging economy/development state, and/or scarce resources. Research articles of localised content, i.e. of interest only to specific areas or specialists and which would not appeal to the broader readership of the Journal, should preferably not be submitted for consideration by the Editorial Committee. Ethical considerations: A brief narrative account/description of ethical issues/aspects should be included in articles that report on empirical findings.
期刊最新文献
Setting up classroom libraries in rural areas: The case of Mogodumo circuit in Limpopo Obstacles to critical thinking: A qualitative study on secondary school learners in Masvingo, Zimbabwe The effect of life-design-based counselling on high school learners from resource-constrained communities Dispositional mindfulness associated with less academic burnout among Muslim students during the COVID-19 pandemic Guidelines for instructional design of courses for the development of self-regulated learning for teachers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1