Liberals and the Ukrainian Question in Imperial Russia, 1905–1917

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Revolutionary Russia Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/09546545.2020.1813927
Mariya Melentyeva
{"title":"Liberals and the Ukrainian Question in Imperial Russia, 1905–1917","authors":"Mariya Melentyeva","doi":"10.1080/09546545.2020.1813927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the spring of 1917, the Provisional Government headed by the liberals faced an unexpected challenge from Kiev, where local liberals supported the idea of an autonomous Ukraine within Russia. While the St Petersburg liberals did not dismiss the idea of Ukrainian autonomy entirely, they viewed this position as premature. Using internal Kadet party documents, this article argues that the central committee and Kiev party members interpreted nationalism in Russia’s political transformation differently. The Kiev liberals considered Ukrainian nationalism a tool for the liberal transformation of the region; in contrast, the liberals in the centre envisioned the liberalization of Russia as a juridical and universal process from above, separate from nationality questions.","PeriodicalId":42121,"journal":{"name":"Revolutionary Russia","volume":"33 1","pages":"151 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09546545.2020.1813927","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revolutionary Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2020.1813927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the spring of 1917, the Provisional Government headed by the liberals faced an unexpected challenge from Kiev, where local liberals supported the idea of an autonomous Ukraine within Russia. While the St Petersburg liberals did not dismiss the idea of Ukrainian autonomy entirely, they viewed this position as premature. Using internal Kadet party documents, this article argues that the central committee and Kiev party members interpreted nationalism in Russia’s political transformation differently. The Kiev liberals considered Ukrainian nationalism a tool for the liberal transformation of the region; in contrast, the liberals in the centre envisioned the liberalization of Russia as a juridical and universal process from above, separate from nationality questions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1905–1917年俄罗斯帝国的自由主义者与乌克兰问题
1917年春,由自由主义者领导的临时政府面临来自基辅的意外挑战,当地自由主义者支持在俄罗斯内部建立自治乌克兰的想法。虽然圣彼得堡的自由主义者并没有完全否定乌克兰自治的想法,但他们认为这种立场为时过早。本文利用立宪民主党内部文件,论证了中央委员会和基辅党成员对俄罗斯政治转型中的民族主义的不同解读。基辅的自由主义者认为,乌克兰民族主义是该地区实现自由主义转型的工具;相反,中间派的自由主义者将俄罗斯的自由化设想为一个自上而下的司法和普遍进程,与国籍问题分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
A Re-Examination of Russian Harvest Statistics for the End of the Nineteenth Century Islamic Leadership and the State in Eurasia Russian Pogroms and Jewish Revolution, 1905. Class, Ethnicity, Autocracy in the First Russian Revolution Foreign Business and Revolution: The British Engineering Company of Russia and Siberia, 1918–1921 Recent French Historiography and the Legacy of the Revolutions of 1917
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1