Shared Savings Model Risk in the MSSP Program

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI:10.1080/10920277.2021.1993927
I. Duncan, A. Mackenzie, Elise Bonfiglio, T. Wrigley, Xiyue Liao
{"title":"Shared Savings Model Risk in the MSSP Program","authors":"I. Duncan, A. Mackenzie, Elise Bonfiglio, T. Wrigley, Xiyue Liao","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2021.1993927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) for accountable care organizations (ACOs) as part of the Affordable Care Act. Participating ACOs accept risk for the financial outcomes of their assigned populations and share in gains (and, depending on the ACO model, losses) when these are generated. Gains and losses are calculated by comparing actual costs of the ACO population against a benchmark cost based on the historical performance of members in the ACO. Participating ACOs are at risk of model error. Because of stochastic variance in cost distributions and the imperfect operation of the risk-adjustment process, there is a nontrivial probability that an ACO may experience a false positive (gains are calculated where no gains were actually generated) or false negative (a loss is calculated by the model when no losses were actually generated). Using a sample of Medicare fee-for-service data, we model outcomes for typical ACOs and for ACOs consisting of chronic patients. For a typical ACO, the probability of model error resulting in a false positive or false negative outcome is between 5% and 8%. Chronic populations with higher variance have higher probabilities of model error, between 26% and 28% for a diabetes population, and about 23% for a cancer population. In the case of an ACO that generates gains through increased efficiency, model error can result in the ACO failing to realize gains, or even (in a minority of cases) require a reimbursement to the payer. From the perspective of the payer with a number of ACOs, the average overpayment or recovery will be minor. The percentage overpayment (recovery) increases as the prevalence of chronic patients increases. For a population of cancer patients a payer can expect to pay (or recover) between 1.0% and 2.0% of claims, while for a diabetes population the range is 1.5–2.5%. For an individual ACO the loss or gain is more significant because the ACO gains or loses the full amount, with a relatively high probability. While this study has focused on the Medicare Shared Savings Program, the MSSP is just an example of a class of gainsharing models that is increasingly prevalent in value-based contracts. Payers and providers who negotiate value-based contracts need to be aware of and account for model risk in their contracts, particularly as the sizes of populations under management become smaller.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2021.1993927","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) for accountable care organizations (ACOs) as part of the Affordable Care Act. Participating ACOs accept risk for the financial outcomes of their assigned populations and share in gains (and, depending on the ACO model, losses) when these are generated. Gains and losses are calculated by comparing actual costs of the ACO population against a benchmark cost based on the historical performance of members in the ACO. Participating ACOs are at risk of model error. Because of stochastic variance in cost distributions and the imperfect operation of the risk-adjustment process, there is a nontrivial probability that an ACO may experience a false positive (gains are calculated where no gains were actually generated) or false negative (a loss is calculated by the model when no losses were actually generated). Using a sample of Medicare fee-for-service data, we model outcomes for typical ACOs and for ACOs consisting of chronic patients. For a typical ACO, the probability of model error resulting in a false positive or false negative outcome is between 5% and 8%. Chronic populations with higher variance have higher probabilities of model error, between 26% and 28% for a diabetes population, and about 23% for a cancer population. In the case of an ACO that generates gains through increased efficiency, model error can result in the ACO failing to realize gains, or even (in a minority of cases) require a reimbursement to the payer. From the perspective of the payer with a number of ACOs, the average overpayment or recovery will be minor. The percentage overpayment (recovery) increases as the prevalence of chronic patients increases. For a population of cancer patients a payer can expect to pay (or recover) between 1.0% and 2.0% of claims, while for a diabetes population the range is 1.5–2.5%. For an individual ACO the loss or gain is more significant because the ACO gains or loses the full amount, with a relatively high probability. While this study has focused on the Medicare Shared Savings Program, the MSSP is just an example of a class of gainsharing models that is increasingly prevalent in value-based contracts. Payers and providers who negotiate value-based contracts need to be aware of and account for model risk in their contracts, particularly as the sizes of populations under management become smaller.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享储蓄模式在MSSP计划中的风险
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)为负责任的医疗机构(ACOs)推出了医疗保险共享储蓄计划(MSSP),作为《平价医疗法案》的一部分。参与的ACO承担其指定人群的财务结果的风险,并在产生收益时分享收益(以及,取决于ACO模型,损失)。收益和损失的计算方法,是将蚁群管理人员的实际成本,与以蚁群管理人员的历史表现为基础的基准成本进行比较。参与的aco有模型错误的风险。由于成本分布的随机方差和风险调整过程的不完善操作,ACO可能会出现假阳性(在实际没有产生收益的情况下计算收益)或假阴性(在实际没有产生损失的情况下由模型计算损失)的可能性很大。使用医疗保险按服务收费数据样本,我们对典型的ACOs和由慢性患者组成的ACOs的结果进行了建模。对于一个典型的ACO,模型误差导致假阳性或假阴性结果的概率在5%到8%之间。具有较高方差的慢性人群的模型误差概率更高,糖尿病人群的模型误差概率在26%到28%之间,癌症人群的模型误差概率约为23%。在通过提高效率产生收益的ACO的情况下,模型错误可能导致ACO无法实现收益,甚至(在少数情况下)需要向付款人报销。从拥有多个aco的付款人的角度来看,平均多付或追回的费用将是很小的。随着慢性病患者患病率的增加,多付(恢复)的百分比也随之增加。对于癌症患者,付款人可以预期支付(或收回)索赔的1.0%至2.0%,而对于糖尿病患者,这一范围为1.5%至2.5%。对于单个蚁群而言,损失或收益更为重要,因为蚁群获得或损失的全部金额,具有相对较高的概率。虽然这项研究的重点是医疗保险共享储蓄计划,但MSSP只是一类收益共享模式的一个例子,这种模式在基于价值的合同中越来越普遍。谈判基于价值的合同的支付方和提供者需要意识到并考虑其合同中的模型风险,特别是在管理的人口规模变小的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1