Harm reduction in Italy: the experience of an unsanctioned supervised injection facility run by drug users

IF 0.9 Q3 Psychology Drugs and Alcohol Today Pub Date : 2019-06-03 DOI:10.1108/DAT-03-2018-0011
Sonia Bergamo, G. Parisi, P. Jarre
{"title":"Harm reduction in Italy: the experience of an unsanctioned supervised injection facility run by drug users","authors":"Sonia Bergamo, G. Parisi, P. Jarre","doi":"10.1108/DAT-03-2018-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nEfforts to establish harm reduction interventions in Italy have persisted since the mid-1990s. Despite this, no sanctioned SIF has ever been implemented. The purpose of this paper is to provide information about a 10 year unsanctioned drug user-run SIF experience in Italy called Stanzetta.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe aim of the paper is to assess how Stanzetta met its objectives. Analysis was conducted compiling narrative accounts from the staff working in the NSP, which is adjacent to the Stanzetta, and conducting a simple frequency analysis of the available statistical data.\n\n\nFindings\nThe Stanzetta unsanctioned SIF has been running for ten years and continues to be vulnerable due to its legal status. Being open 24 h/days has maximised its accessibility, but at the same time, it has encouraged a misuse of the Stanzetta. Although not trained, drug users became self-empowered to run the Stanzetta and to keep it clean, but the hygiene-health aspect is seen as one of the greatest challenges by the NSP professional staff. Over 10 years, not a single overdose death has been recorded. Drug use in the park has shifted from more visible places to the Stanzetta. As a result, the abandoned syringes have diminished in number and those disposed of correctly have increased. Moreover, no complaints from citizens or law enforcement were ever made. The neighbourhood acceptance seems to be the main goal of the peer-run unsanctioned SIF.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper is based on a narrative account from the point of view of the professional staff involved, and results are specific to the context in which the study was conducted. Because of the chosen approach, the research results lack scientific generalisability. A relevant limitation is that no peer was involved in this study. Despite this, the research contributes to the information based on peer-run SIFs and makes a case for the de-medicalisation of SIFs in Europe.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper gives visibility to a long-lasting drug user-run SIF experience that was not made public mostly for an unclear legislative background about SIF in Italy.\n\n\nSocial implications\nEfforts to establish harm reduction interventions in Italy have persisted since the mid-1990s and were undertaken primarily in response to epidemics of HIV infection and overdose (DPA, 2017). Despite this, no sanctioned SIF has ever been implemented. Primarily, this study wants to underline the urgency for an SIF pilot in Italy, and secondly the need to consider de-medicalising these services through direct support for peer-based models.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe Stanzetta unsanctioned SIF in Italy that has been running for ten years. Despite this, the venue continues to be vulnerable due to its legal status. For this reason, these results were never made public before. The experience showed a good working synergy between NSP professionals and the SIF peers. This model can be considered as a “light” de-medicalisation form to be explored and eventually to be implemented as a pilot SIF in Italy.\n","PeriodicalId":44780,"journal":{"name":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/DAT-03-2018-0011","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs and Alcohol Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DAT-03-2018-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Purpose Efforts to establish harm reduction interventions in Italy have persisted since the mid-1990s. Despite this, no sanctioned SIF has ever been implemented. The purpose of this paper is to provide information about a 10 year unsanctioned drug user-run SIF experience in Italy called Stanzetta. Design/methodology/approach The aim of the paper is to assess how Stanzetta met its objectives. Analysis was conducted compiling narrative accounts from the staff working in the NSP, which is adjacent to the Stanzetta, and conducting a simple frequency analysis of the available statistical data. Findings The Stanzetta unsanctioned SIF has been running for ten years and continues to be vulnerable due to its legal status. Being open 24 h/days has maximised its accessibility, but at the same time, it has encouraged a misuse of the Stanzetta. Although not trained, drug users became self-empowered to run the Stanzetta and to keep it clean, but the hygiene-health aspect is seen as one of the greatest challenges by the NSP professional staff. Over 10 years, not a single overdose death has been recorded. Drug use in the park has shifted from more visible places to the Stanzetta. As a result, the abandoned syringes have diminished in number and those disposed of correctly have increased. Moreover, no complaints from citizens or law enforcement were ever made. The neighbourhood acceptance seems to be the main goal of the peer-run unsanctioned SIF. Research limitations/implications The paper is based on a narrative account from the point of view of the professional staff involved, and results are specific to the context in which the study was conducted. Because of the chosen approach, the research results lack scientific generalisability. A relevant limitation is that no peer was involved in this study. Despite this, the research contributes to the information based on peer-run SIFs and makes a case for the de-medicalisation of SIFs in Europe. Practical implications This paper gives visibility to a long-lasting drug user-run SIF experience that was not made public mostly for an unclear legislative background about SIF in Italy. Social implications Efforts to establish harm reduction interventions in Italy have persisted since the mid-1990s and were undertaken primarily in response to epidemics of HIV infection and overdose (DPA, 2017). Despite this, no sanctioned SIF has ever been implemented. Primarily, this study wants to underline the urgency for an SIF pilot in Italy, and secondly the need to consider de-medicalising these services through direct support for peer-based models. Originality/value The Stanzetta unsanctioned SIF in Italy that has been running for ten years. Despite this, the venue continues to be vulnerable due to its legal status. For this reason, these results were never made public before. The experience showed a good working synergy between NSP professionals and the SIF peers. This model can be considered as a “light” de-medicalisation form to be explored and eventually to be implemented as a pilot SIF in Italy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少意大利的危害:由吸毒者经营的未经批准的监督注射设施的经验
目的自20世纪90年代中期以来,意大利一直在努力建立减少伤害的干预措施。尽管如此,从未实施过任何批准的SIF。本文的目的是提供有关意大利一个名为Stanzetta的未经批准的吸毒者经营的SIF经历的信息。设计/方法/方法本文的目的是评估Stanzetta如何实现其目标。进行了分析,汇编了在毗邻Stanzetta的国家安全方案工作人员的叙述,并对现有统计数据进行了简单的频率分析。Stanzetta未经批准的SIF已经运行了十年,由于其法律地位,它仍然很脆弱。24小时全天候开放使其可达性最大化,但同时也助长了对Stanzetta的滥用。虽然没有受过培训,但吸毒者已经能够自主管理Stanzetta并保持其清洁,但卫生保健方面被国家安全方案专业人员视为最大的挑战之一。10年来,没有一例用药过量死亡的记录。公园里的毒品使用已经从更显眼的地方转移到了斯坦泽塔。因此,废弃的注射器数量减少,而正确处理的注射器数量增加。此外,没有公民或执法部门提出申诉。邻里接受似乎是同行管理的未经批准的SIF的主要目标。研究的局限性/意义本文是从所涉及的专业人员的角度叙述的,结果是特定于研究进行的背景的。由于研究方法的选择,研究结果缺乏科学的普遍性。一个相关的限制是没有同行参与这项研究。尽管如此,该研究为基于同行运行的sif的信息做出了贡献,并为欧洲sif的去医疗化提供了一个案例。实际意义本文提供了一个长期的吸毒者运行的SIF经验的可见性,主要是因为意大利的SIF立法背景不明确而没有公开。自20世纪90年代中期以来,意大利一直在努力建立减少危害的干预措施,主要是为了应对艾滋病毒感染和用药过量的流行(DPA, 2017年)。尽管如此,从未实施过任何批准的SIF。首先,这项研究希望强调在意大利开展SIF试点的紧迫性,其次,需要考虑通过直接支持基于同行的模式来将这些服务去医疗化。原创性/价值意大利Stanzetta未经批准的SIF已经运行了十年。尽管如此,由于其法律地位,该场地仍然很脆弱。由于这个原因,这些结果以前从未公开过。经验表明,NSP专业人员和SIF同行之间具有良好的工作协同作用。这种模式可以被视为一种“轻”的去医疗化形式,有待探索,并最终在意大利作为SIF试点实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs and Alcohol Today
Drugs and Alcohol Today SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The misuse of drugs act – a user perspective More harm than good? Cannabis, harm and the misuse of drugs act Risk perception, health stressors and reduction in sharing cannabis products during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study From law to regulation: re-appraising the misuse of Drugs Act 1971 Fifty years of the UK Misuse of Drugs Act 1971: the legislative contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1