Food Insecurity and Assistance on Campus: A Survey of the Student Body

Michael Miller, G. Middendorf, Spencer D. Wood, Sonya Lutter, Scott Jones, Brian L. Lindshield
{"title":"Food Insecurity and Assistance on Campus: A Survey of the Student Body","authors":"Michael Miller, G. Middendorf, Spencer D. Wood, Sonya Lutter, Scott Jones, Brian L. Lindshield","doi":"10.4148/1936-0487.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to recent studies, food insecurity affects from 34%-59% of college students. This will continue to be an issue as tuition increases and more low-income and first-generation students enter universities and colleges. Nearly 52% of college students live at, or near, the poverty level, compared to a national poverty rate of 14.5%. This leaves many undergraduate and graduate students with challenging decisions around meeting their basic housing, nutritional, and educational expenses. To assess food insecurity at Kansas State University (KSU), a random sample of undergraduate and graduate students was surveyed. Findings include a high rate of food insecurity (44.3%) among respondents. This measure was calculated by summing the affirmative responses to the USDA short-form food security questions in the survey. This means that during a 7-month period during the 2016 to 2017 academic year, 44.3% of respondents experienced at least two of the following: 1) didn’t have enough food to last and didn’t have money to buy more, 2) couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals, 3) cut the size of or skipped meals, 4) ate less than they felt they should because they didn’t have enough money, or, 5) were hungry and didn’t eat. This finding is consistent with other studies that report food insecurity rates between 34% and 59% at U.S. universities and community colleges. Fifty-seven percent of respondents were generally aware that food insecurity is a significant problem on college campuses. A majority of respondents (63%) reported that they knew students besides themselves who, currently or sometime during the academic year, had 1 This research was supported in part by USDA Multistate Research Project NC1196, “Food Systems, Health, and Well-Being: Understanding Complex Relationships and Dynamics of Change.” 2 problems with food insecurity or hunger. Yet food assistance (e.g., food pantries) and SNAP are seldom used and responses regarding the use of an on-campus food pantry were mixed. Despite this mixed response, over 2,000 students had used the campus food pantry within the one-year period between opening in 2017 to 2018 (Bishop 2018). Introduction Food insecurity occurs when a household reduces the quality, variety, or desirability of its diet. It can lead to disrupted eating patterns and reduced food intake (USDA ERS 2016). Before the recession in 2007, the rate of food insecurity in the U.S. was 11.1% (USDA ERS 2018). According to the latest available data, the food insecurity rate has not recovered to its prerecession level. An estimated 12.3% of households, or 15.8 million households (42 million individuals) “were food insecure at least some time during the year in 2016” (USDA ERS 2017). Many historically marginalized people in the U.S. live in so-called “food deserts” or areas with little to no available and accessible “healthy” food. Individuals residing in food deserts are more likely to be economically disadvantaged, have poorer nutrition, be exposed to unhealthy behaviors, develop diet-related poor health outcomes, and are geographically disadvantaged in terms of the number of food stores in their general area of residence (Guy and David 2004). Morland and Filomena (2007) and Franco et al. (2008) report that access to full-service retail food outlets offering fresh and frozen produce is better in predominantly white and higher income neighborhoods than in black, mixed race, and lower income neighborhoods. Within the relatively few supermarkets and grocery stores found in black, mixed race, and lower income neighborhoods in large cities, the amount and variety of healthy foods was found to be significantly lower than in supermarkets and grocery stores in predominately white and higher","PeriodicalId":91938,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of rural research and policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of rural research and policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/1936-0487.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

According to recent studies, food insecurity affects from 34%-59% of college students. This will continue to be an issue as tuition increases and more low-income and first-generation students enter universities and colleges. Nearly 52% of college students live at, or near, the poverty level, compared to a national poverty rate of 14.5%. This leaves many undergraduate and graduate students with challenging decisions around meeting their basic housing, nutritional, and educational expenses. To assess food insecurity at Kansas State University (KSU), a random sample of undergraduate and graduate students was surveyed. Findings include a high rate of food insecurity (44.3%) among respondents. This measure was calculated by summing the affirmative responses to the USDA short-form food security questions in the survey. This means that during a 7-month period during the 2016 to 2017 academic year, 44.3% of respondents experienced at least two of the following: 1) didn’t have enough food to last and didn’t have money to buy more, 2) couldn’t afford to eat balanced meals, 3) cut the size of or skipped meals, 4) ate less than they felt they should because they didn’t have enough money, or, 5) were hungry and didn’t eat. This finding is consistent with other studies that report food insecurity rates between 34% and 59% at U.S. universities and community colleges. Fifty-seven percent of respondents were generally aware that food insecurity is a significant problem on college campuses. A majority of respondents (63%) reported that they knew students besides themselves who, currently or sometime during the academic year, had 1 This research was supported in part by USDA Multistate Research Project NC1196, “Food Systems, Health, and Well-Being: Understanding Complex Relationships and Dynamics of Change.” 2 problems with food insecurity or hunger. Yet food assistance (e.g., food pantries) and SNAP are seldom used and responses regarding the use of an on-campus food pantry were mixed. Despite this mixed response, over 2,000 students had used the campus food pantry within the one-year period between opening in 2017 to 2018 (Bishop 2018). Introduction Food insecurity occurs when a household reduces the quality, variety, or desirability of its diet. It can lead to disrupted eating patterns and reduced food intake (USDA ERS 2016). Before the recession in 2007, the rate of food insecurity in the U.S. was 11.1% (USDA ERS 2018). According to the latest available data, the food insecurity rate has not recovered to its prerecession level. An estimated 12.3% of households, or 15.8 million households (42 million individuals) “were food insecure at least some time during the year in 2016” (USDA ERS 2017). Many historically marginalized people in the U.S. live in so-called “food deserts” or areas with little to no available and accessible “healthy” food. Individuals residing in food deserts are more likely to be economically disadvantaged, have poorer nutrition, be exposed to unhealthy behaviors, develop diet-related poor health outcomes, and are geographically disadvantaged in terms of the number of food stores in their general area of residence (Guy and David 2004). Morland and Filomena (2007) and Franco et al. (2008) report that access to full-service retail food outlets offering fresh and frozen produce is better in predominantly white and higher income neighborhoods than in black, mixed race, and lower income neighborhoods. Within the relatively few supermarkets and grocery stores found in black, mixed race, and lower income neighborhoods in large cities, the amount and variety of healthy foods was found to be significantly lower than in supermarkets and grocery stores in predominately white and higher
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校园食品安全与救助:学生群体调查
根据最近的研究,粮食不安全影响了34%-59%的大学生。随着学费的上涨,越来越多的低收入和第一代学生进入大学和学院,这将继续成为一个问题。近52%的大学生生活在或接近贫困水平,而全国贫困率为14.5%。这让许多本科生和研究生在满足基本住房、营养和教育费用方面面临着挑战。为了评估堪萨斯州立大学(KSU)的粮食不安全状况,对本科生和研究生进行了随机抽样调查。调查结果显示,受访者的粮食不安全率很高(44.3%)。这一衡量标准是通过总结调查中对美国农业部简短食品安全问题的肯定回答来计算的。这意味着,在2016至2017学年的7个月时间里,44.3%的受访者至少经历了以下两种情况:1)没有足够的食物吃,也没有钱买更多,2)吃不起均衡的膳食,3)减少用餐量或不用餐,4)因为没有足够的钱而吃得比他们觉得应该吃的少,或者,5)饿了,没有吃东西。这一发现与其他研究一致,这些研究报告称,美国大学和社区学院的粮食不安全率在34%至59%之间。57%的受访者普遍意识到,粮食不安全是大学校园里的一个重大问题。大多数受访者(63%)表示,除了他们自己之外,他们还认识一些学生,这些学生目前或在本学年的某个时候有1这项研究得到了美国农业部多州研究项目NC1196的部分支持,该项目名为“粮食系统、健康和福祉:了解复杂的关系和变化动态”。2粮食不安全或饥饿问题。然而,很少使用食品援助(如食品储藏室)和SNAP,对使用校内食品储藏室的反应也不一。尽管反应不一,但在2017年至2018年开放的一年内,已有2000多名学生使用了校园食品储藏室(Bishop 2018)。引言当一个家庭的饮食质量、种类或可取性降低时,就会出现粮食不安全。它会导致饮食模式紊乱和食物摄入减少(美国农业部ERS 2016)。在2007年经济衰退之前,美国的粮食不安全率为11.1%(美国农业部ERS 2018)。根据现有的最新数据,粮食不安全率尚未恢复到危机前的水平。据估计,12.3%的家庭,即1580万户家庭(4200万人)“至少在2016年的某个时候粮食不安全”(美国农业部ERS 2017)。美国许多历史上被边缘化的人生活在所谓的“食物沙漠”或几乎没有可用和可获得的“健康”食物的地区。居住在食物沙漠中的个人更有可能在经济上处于不利地位,营养较差,接触不健康行为,出现与饮食相关的不良健康结果,并且在其一般居住区的食品商店数量方面处于地理不利地位(Guy和David,2004年)。Morland和Filomena(2007年)以及Franco等人(2008年)报告称,在以白人为主的高收入社区,提供新鲜和冷冻农产品的全方位服务零售食品店比在黑人、混血和低收入社区更好。在大城市中,在黑人、混血和低收入社区发现的相对较少的超市和杂货店中,健康食品的数量和种类明显低于以白人为主的超市和食品店
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using text analysis to assess the mental health impacts of COVID-19 on rural healthcare providers Treating a Public Health Crisis for Rural Moms – A Comparative Analysis of Four Rural States Addressing Maternal Opioid Misuse with Medicaid Innovation Models Mentee Perceptions of Public School Superintendent Mentorship in a Rural, Midwest State “You’re in apple land but you are a lemon:” Connection, Collaboration, and Division in Early ‘70s Indian Country Expanding the Capacity of Rural Cancer Care With Teleoncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1