Development of the Persian Version of Dichotic Offset Measure and Evaluation of Its Psychometric Properties in Normal-hearing Children: A Pilot Study

IF 0.4 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Auditory and Vestibular Research Pub Date : 2023-03-12 DOI:10.18502/avr.v32i2.12168
Reza Irani, Farzaneh Fatahi, S. Farahani, Sahar Shomeil Shushtari, S. Jalaie, J. Katz
{"title":"Development of the Persian Version of Dichotic Offset Measure and Evaluation of Its Psychometric Properties in Normal-hearing Children: A Pilot Study","authors":"Reza Irani, Farzaneh Fatahi, S. Farahani, Sahar Shomeil Shushtari, S. Jalaie, J. Katz","doi":"10.18502/avr.v32i2.12168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Buffalo model consists of four Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) categories: decoding, tolerance-fading memory, organization, and integration. Integration is considered as the most complex category. The Dichotic Offset Measure  (DOM) provides valuable information about the organization and integration problems. The present study aimed to develop the Persian version of the DOM (P-DOM) and evaluate its psychometric properties in normal-hearing children. \nMethods: In this study, 25 normal-hearing children (13 girls) aged 7–12 years participated and were divided into six age groups. The face validity was determined based on the opinions of 15 experts, five children with CAPD, and five normal-hearing children. All children were tested with the Persian staggered spondaic word test, Persian phonemic synthesis test, and the Persian randomized dichotic digit test. \nResults: The results showed the high face validity of the P-DOM. No significant differences were observed between the scores of girls and boys (p=0.394 for the right non-competing, p=0.623 for the right competing, p=0.155 for the left competing, p=0.066 for the left non- competing, p=0.174 for the total score, and p=0.701 for the reversals). Significant differences were observed in the main scores of P-DOM test among the age groups. The Spearman test showed a high test-retest reliability (r>0.69). \nConclusion: As a preliminary study it seems that the P-DOM has good validity and reliability to be used in normal-hearing children, but it needs further research with larger sample size. \nKeywords: Auditory processing; dichotic offset measure; dichotic listening; integration deficit","PeriodicalId":34089,"journal":{"name":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory and Vestibular Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/avr.v32i2.12168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aim: Buffalo model consists of four Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD) categories: decoding, tolerance-fading memory, organization, and integration. Integration is considered as the most complex category. The Dichotic Offset Measure  (DOM) provides valuable information about the organization and integration problems. The present study aimed to develop the Persian version of the DOM (P-DOM) and evaluate its psychometric properties in normal-hearing children. Methods: In this study, 25 normal-hearing children (13 girls) aged 7–12 years participated and were divided into six age groups. The face validity was determined based on the opinions of 15 experts, five children with CAPD, and five normal-hearing children. All children were tested with the Persian staggered spondaic word test, Persian phonemic synthesis test, and the Persian randomized dichotic digit test. Results: The results showed the high face validity of the P-DOM. No significant differences were observed between the scores of girls and boys (p=0.394 for the right non-competing, p=0.623 for the right competing, p=0.155 for the left competing, p=0.066 for the left non- competing, p=0.174 for the total score, and p=0.701 for the reversals). Significant differences were observed in the main scores of P-DOM test among the age groups. The Spearman test showed a high test-retest reliability (r>0.69). Conclusion: As a preliminary study it seems that the P-DOM has good validity and reliability to be used in normal-hearing children, but it needs further research with larger sample size. Keywords: Auditory processing; dichotic offset measure; dichotic listening; integration deficit
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语版二分偏转量表的开发及其对正常听力儿童心理测量特性的评价:一项初步研究
背景和目的:水牛模型由四类中枢听觉处理障碍(CAPD)组成:解码、容忍衰退记忆、组织和整合。一体化被认为是最复杂的类别。二分偏移度量(DOM)提供了有关组织和集成问题的有价值的信息。本研究旨在开发波斯语版DOM(P-DOM),并评估其在听力正常儿童中的心理测量特性。方法:在本研究中,25名7-12岁的正常听力儿童(13名女孩)参加了研究,并被分为6个年龄组。面部有效性是根据15名专家、5名CAPD儿童和5名听力正常儿童的意见确定的。所有儿童都接受了波斯交错对应词测试、波斯音素合成测试和波斯随机二分位数测试。结果:结果表明P-DOM具有较高的人脸有效性。女孩和男孩的得分没有显著差异(右侧非竞赛组p=0.394,右侧竞赛组p=0.623,左侧竞赛组p=0.155,左侧非竞赛组p=0.066,总分p=0.174,逆转组p=0.701)。P-DOM测试的主要得分在不同年龄组之间存在显著差异。Spearman检验具有较高的重测信度(r>0.69)。关键词:听觉加工;二分法偏移量;二分听;整合赤字
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Auditory and Vestibular Research
Auditory and Vestibular Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Characteristics and Hearing Aid Uptake Rate of Patients Seen at the Community Hearing Clinic: A Model of Upstream Preventive Care and Earlier Intervention The Use of Homotonic Monosyllabic Words in the Persian Language for the Word-in-Noise Perception Test Development of a Smart Game Application for Auditory Training of Children with Spatial Processing Disorder in Iran: A Pilot Study Investigating the Effect of Persian Phonemic Synthesis Program in Cochlear Implant Users with Phoneme Processing Dificulities Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy on the Daily Life Aspects of Military Men with Persistent Postural- Perceptual Dizziness: A Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1