Salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli Levels as Indicators of Dental Caries Development in Iranian Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Sepideh Najafi, M. Mardani, M. Motamedifar, M. Nazarinia, M. Hadadi
{"title":"Salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli Levels as Indicators of Dental Caries Development in Iranian Patients with Systemic Sclerosis","authors":"Sepideh Najafi, M. Mardani, M. Motamedifar, M. Nazarinia, M. Hadadi","doi":"10.30699/ijmm.16.4.350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disorder with orofacial manifestations, including tooth decay. Lactobacilli can inhibit biofilm formation and growth of cariogenic pathogens, such as Streptococcus mutans. We aimed to assess the salivary levels of S. mutans and Lactobacilli as indicators of dental caries development in patients with systemic sclerosis. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 patients with systemic sclerosis were assigned into 2 groups, anticentromere antibody (ACA) positive (n=42) and ACA-negative (n=38). Besides, 80 ageand gender-matched healthy individuals were enrolled as control. Unstimulated saliva was collected in sterile tubes. Blood agar and tomato juice agar were used to cultivate S. mutans and Lactobacilli. The number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) was calculated and compared between the groups. Results: S. mutans in patients (median=1.6×107 CFU/mL; interquartile range (IQR): 1.1–3.1 ×107 CFU/mL) was significantly higher than control group (median=5.1×106 CFU/mL; IQR: 5.1–7.9 ×106 CFU/mL) (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test); however, the median Lactobacilli levels was similar between these groups (3.4×106 vs. 2.2×106 CFU/mL; P=0.095). The median concentrations of S. mutans (1.3×107 vs. 2.4×107 CFU/mL; P=0.342) and Lactobacilli (4.1×106 CFU/mL vs. 3.1×106 CFU/mL; P=0.515) in the ACA-positive and ACA-negative patients had no significant differences. There were no significant correlation coefficients between S. mutans and Lactobacilli levels in the study groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest the higher levels of salivary S. mutans in patients with systemic sclerosis might increase the likelihood of dental caries over time; however, it was not affected by the ACA status.","PeriodicalId":14580,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijmm.16.4.350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and Aim: Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disorder with orofacial manifestations, including tooth decay. Lactobacilli can inhibit biofilm formation and growth of cariogenic pathogens, such as Streptococcus mutans. We aimed to assess the salivary levels of S. mutans and Lactobacilli as indicators of dental caries development in patients with systemic sclerosis. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 80 patients with systemic sclerosis were assigned into 2 groups, anticentromere antibody (ACA) positive (n=42) and ACA-negative (n=38). Besides, 80 ageand gender-matched healthy individuals were enrolled as control. Unstimulated saliva was collected in sterile tubes. Blood agar and tomato juice agar were used to cultivate S. mutans and Lactobacilli. The number of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) was calculated and compared between the groups. Results: S. mutans in patients (median=1.6×107 CFU/mL; interquartile range (IQR): 1.1–3.1 ×107 CFU/mL) was significantly higher than control group (median=5.1×106 CFU/mL; IQR: 5.1–7.9 ×106 CFU/mL) (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney U-test); however, the median Lactobacilli levels was similar between these groups (3.4×106 vs. 2.2×106 CFU/mL; P=0.095). The median concentrations of S. mutans (1.3×107 vs. 2.4×107 CFU/mL; P=0.342) and Lactobacilli (4.1×106 CFU/mL vs. 3.1×106 CFU/mL; P=0.515) in the ACA-positive and ACA-negative patients had no significant differences. There were no significant correlation coefficients between S. mutans and Lactobacilli levels in the study groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest the higher levels of salivary S. mutans in patients with systemic sclerosis might increase the likelihood of dental caries over time; however, it was not affected by the ACA status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
唾液变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌水平作为伊朗系统性硬化症患者龋齿发展的指标
背景和目的:系统性硬化症是一种自身免疫性疾病,有口腔面部表现,包括蛀牙。乳酸杆菌可以抑制致龋病原体(如变形链球菌)的生物膜形成和生长。我们的目的是评估唾液中变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌的水平,作为系统性硬化症患者龋齿发展的指标。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,80例系统性硬化症患者被分为两组,抗端粒抗体(ACA)阳性(n=42)和ACA阴性(n=38)。此外,80名年龄和性别匹配的健康个体被纳入对照。在无菌管中收集未刺激的唾液。用血琼脂和番茄汁琼脂培养变形链球菌和乳酸杆菌。计算每毫升菌落形成单位数(CFU/mL),并在各组之间进行比较。结果:患者唾液中的变异链球菌(中位数=1.6×107CFU/mL;四分位间距1.1~3.1×107CFu/mL)显著高于对照组(中位数=5.1×106CFU/mL,IQR:5.1-7.9×106CFu/mL,P<0.05);然而,它没有受到ACA地位的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis spp. Isolates in Bandar Abbas, South of Iran Molecular Detection of Oral Helicobacter pylori and Its Association with Dental Conditions Among Patients with Helicobacter Infection in Baghdad City Qualitative Melissopalynology Analysis, Glucose Oxydase Activity, and Antibacterial Effect of Honey Samples from Different Botanical Origin Antagonistic Activity of Bacteriocin-Producing Lactobacillus Local Isolates Against Select Pathogenic Bacterial Strains Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Study of Risk Factors, Outcome and Utility of Nasal Samples in Its Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1