{"title":"From questionnaire to interview in survey research: Paul F. Lazarsfeld and the Wirtschaftspsychologische Forschungsstelle in interwar Vienna","authors":"Eric Hounshell","doi":"10.1080/17496977.2022.2097583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In interwar Vienna, Paul F. Lazarsfeld and his colleagues developed an approach to survey research that used the questionnaire and the direct, face-to-face interview to gather data about subjective experience for aggregative analysis. For these young researchers, the questionnaire-based interview emerged from a contradictory set of Central European intellectual traditions and political concerns. Enthusiasm on the political left for quantification and the gathering of social data encouraged survey research; yet, local political allies and intellectual mentors also opposed the study of individual attitudes and the quantitative aggregation of such material. Academic psychology legitimized the use of “introspection” and facilitated the extension of this method to populations of untrained subjects. The methodological concept of the “model” helped overcome the Verstehen/Erklären dichotomy within debates over the proper methods of the human and social sciences. This article examines methodological and philosophical statements, study designs, and questionnaires to explain how the interview gained particular importance within this setting.","PeriodicalId":39827,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual History Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"619 - 644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2022.2097583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT In interwar Vienna, Paul F. Lazarsfeld and his colleagues developed an approach to survey research that used the questionnaire and the direct, face-to-face interview to gather data about subjective experience for aggregative analysis. For these young researchers, the questionnaire-based interview emerged from a contradictory set of Central European intellectual traditions and political concerns. Enthusiasm on the political left for quantification and the gathering of social data encouraged survey research; yet, local political allies and intellectual mentors also opposed the study of individual attitudes and the quantitative aggregation of such material. Academic psychology legitimized the use of “introspection” and facilitated the extension of this method to populations of untrained subjects. The methodological concept of the “model” helped overcome the Verstehen/Erklären dichotomy within debates over the proper methods of the human and social sciences. This article examines methodological and philosophical statements, study designs, and questionnaires to explain how the interview gained particular importance within this setting.
在两次世界大战之间的维也纳,Paul F. Lazarsfeld和他的同事开发了一种调查研究方法,使用问卷调查和直接面对面的访谈来收集有关主观经验的数据进行综合分析。对于这些年轻的研究人员来说,基于问卷的访谈出现在中欧知识传统和政治关切的矛盾中。政治左派对量化和收集社会数据的热情鼓励了调查研究;然而,当地的政治盟友和知识分子导师也反对对个人态度的研究和这种材料的定量汇总。学术心理学使“内省”的使用合法化,并促进了这种方法在未经训练的受试者群体中的推广。“模型”的方法论概念帮助克服了Verstehen/Erklären在关于人类和社会科学的适当方法的辩论中的二分法。本文考察了方法学和哲学陈述、研究设计和问卷调查,以解释访谈在这种情况下如何变得特别重要。