Fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS): Development and Initial Validation

Reyhan Aydın Doğan, Sebahat Huseyinoglu, S. Yazıcı
{"title":"Fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS): Development and Initial Validation","authors":"Reyhan Aydın Doğan, Sebahat Huseyinoglu, S. Yazıcı","doi":"10.52547/pcnm.12.4.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Teaching and evaluating fetal development are essential for evaluating maternal and fetal health in the midwifery profession. Objectives: The present study was carried out to examine the validity and reliability of the fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS). Methods: The study data were collected online between March 25 and May 15, 2021, via social media accounts of midwifery students with convenience sampling. 410 midwifery students were included in the study. The data were analyzed using SPSS- AMOS software version 20, descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and frequency percentage), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The suitability of the data for factor analysis was investigated by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient and by Barlett’s test of sphericity. Results : The content validity index of the draft scale was 87%. Kaiser Meyer Olkin test value was 0.927, and the sample was found to be adequate and appropriate. On the other hand, the Bartlett test was obtained as χ2(253) =2648,074 p<0.001, and it was accepted that the scale fulfilled the requirements for exploratory factor analysis. The scale took its final form and consisted of 23 items and one dimension due to the exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The total percentage of variance explained was 36,50%. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.89 high. According to the results of the CFA analysis, when the FDAIS goodness-of-fit indexes are examined; RMSEA 0.046; While it shows acceptable agreement with χ2; GFI 0.916; CFI 0.918; It was found that it was in perfect agreement with (p=0.000). Conclusion: According to the findings, the Fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS) is a valid and reliable measurement tool for undergraduate midwifery students in Turkey and can be used in studies.","PeriodicalId":53068,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/pcnm.12.4.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Teaching and evaluating fetal development are essential for evaluating maternal and fetal health in the midwifery profession. Objectives: The present study was carried out to examine the validity and reliability of the fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS). Methods: The study data were collected online between March 25 and May 15, 2021, via social media accounts of midwifery students with convenience sampling. 410 midwifery students were included in the study. The data were analyzed using SPSS- AMOS software version 20, descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, and frequency percentage), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The suitability of the data for factor analysis was investigated by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient and by Barlett’s test of sphericity. Results : The content validity index of the draft scale was 87%. Kaiser Meyer Olkin test value was 0.927, and the sample was found to be adequate and appropriate. On the other hand, the Bartlett test was obtained as χ2(253) =2648,074 p<0.001, and it was accepted that the scale fulfilled the requirements for exploratory factor analysis. The scale took its final form and consisted of 23 items and one dimension due to the exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The total percentage of variance explained was 36,50%. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was 0.89 high. According to the results of the CFA analysis, when the FDAIS goodness-of-fit indexes are examined; RMSEA 0.046; While it shows acceptable agreement with χ2; GFI 0.916; CFI 0.918; It was found that it was in perfect agreement with (p=0.000). Conclusion: According to the findings, the Fetal Development Assessment Information Scale (FDAIS) is a valid and reliable measurement tool for undergraduate midwifery students in Turkey and can be used in studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿发育评估信息量表(FDAIS):开发和初步验证
背景:教学和评估胎儿发育对于评估助产专业中的孕产妇和胎儿健康至关重要。目的:本研究旨在检验胎儿发育评估信息量表(FDAIS)的有效性和可靠性。方法:研究数据于2021年3月25日至5月15日期间通过助产士学生的社交媒体账户在线收集,方便抽样。410名助产学学生参与了这项研究。使用SPSS-AMOS软件版本20、描述性统计(平均值、标准差、频率和频率百分比)、探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析。通过Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin系数和Barlett球度检验研究了数据对因子分析的适用性。结果:草稿量表的内容有效性指数为87%。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin检验值为0.927,发现样品是充分和合适的。另一方面,Bartlett检验结果为χ2(253)=2648074 p<0.001,该量表满足探索性因素分析的要求。由于探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,该量表最终形成,由23个项目和一个维度组成。解释的总方差百分比为36,50%。该量表的克朗巴赫α系数高达0.89。根据CFA分析的结果,对FDAIS拟合优度指标进行检验;0.046令吉;而与χ2的一致性较好;GFI 0.916;CFI 0.918;结论:根据研究结果,胎儿发育评估信息量表(FDAIS)是一种有效可靠的测量工具,可用于土耳其助产专业本科生的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Orange Essential Oil Aromatherapy on Sleep Quality in Hospitalized Children Effect of Two Therapies: Compassion-Focused and Positive-Oriented on the Body Image among Female Adolescents with a History of Self-Injury Tracheal Cuff Pressure Changes and Associated Factors in Children who underwent Tonsillectomy at Shafa Polyclinic of Zanjan in the 1399-1400 period Attitude and Performance of the Adult Population Regarding Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the City of Gerash, Fars, Iran Anxiety and Depressive Symptomatology among Iranian Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 in January 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1