Game of tax: Rethinking the relationship between redistribution and reciprocity through a Georgian tax lottery

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Economic Anthropology Pub Date : 2022-12-04 DOI:10.1002/sea2.12269
Lotta Björklund Larsen
{"title":"Game of tax: Rethinking the relationship between redistribution and reciprocity through a Georgian tax lottery","authors":"Lotta Björklund Larsen","doi":"10.1002/sea2.12269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This article addresses a failed tax lottery in the country of Georgia's rapid yet shaky political and economic development. The purpose of a tax lottery is to formalize transactions and increase tax compliance. It aims to motivate consumers in any commercial transaction to ask for a receipt qua lottery ticket and ensure that businesses pay taxes due. Tax lotteries thus have a dual function: more revenue is collected from businesses, and consumers do soft policing work while also having a chance to win. Taxation and gambling are two very different ways of exchanging. Gambling is mostly voluntary, effortless, and playful, whereas taxation is dull government revenue collection. Yet both gambling and taxation are ways to understand any society and its political life through its reciprocal qualities and redistributive effects. Drawing on anthropological research studying taxation and gambling, this article is a Schumpeterian analysis, as it provides an inlet into how Georgians regard their society. Studying this tax lottery provides an opportunity to rethink the relation between redistribution and reciprocity, and I argue that to understand how citizens accept the redistribution of taxation, we have to attend to its reciprocal qualities.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":45372,"journal":{"name":"Economic Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sea2.12269","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sea2.12269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses a failed tax lottery in the country of Georgia's rapid yet shaky political and economic development. The purpose of a tax lottery is to formalize transactions and increase tax compliance. It aims to motivate consumers in any commercial transaction to ask for a receipt qua lottery ticket and ensure that businesses pay taxes due. Tax lotteries thus have a dual function: more revenue is collected from businesses, and consumers do soft policing work while also having a chance to win. Taxation and gambling are two very different ways of exchanging. Gambling is mostly voluntary, effortless, and playful, whereas taxation is dull government revenue collection. Yet both gambling and taxation are ways to understand any society and its political life through its reciprocal qualities and redistributive effects. Drawing on anthropological research studying taxation and gambling, this article is a Schumpeterian analysis, as it provides an inlet into how Georgians regard their society. Studying this tax lottery provides an opportunity to rethink the relation between redistribution and reciprocity, and I argue that to understand how citizens accept the redistribution of taxation, we have to attend to its reciprocal qualities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
税收游戏:通过格鲁吉亚税收彩票重新思考再分配与互惠之间的关系
这篇文章讨论了格鲁吉亚快速但不稳定的政治和经济发展中失败的税收彩票。税收彩票的目的是使交易正规化,提高税收合规性。它的目的是鼓励消费者在任何商业交易中索取像彩票一样的收据,并确保企业缴纳应缴的税款。因此,税收彩票具有双重功能:从企业那里收取更多的收入,消费者在做软监管工作的同时也有机会中奖。征税和赌博是两种截然不同的交换方式。赌博大多是自愿的、不费力气的、好玩的,而税收是乏味的政府收入。然而,赌博和税收都是通过社会的相互性质和再分配效应来理解任何社会及其政治生活的方式。通过对税收和赌博的人类学研究,这篇文章是熊彼特式的分析,因为它为格鲁吉亚人如何看待他们的社会提供了一个入口。研究这种税收彩票提供了一个重新思考再分配与互惠之间关系的机会,我认为,要理解公民如何接受税收的再分配,我们必须关注其互惠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Anthropology
Economic Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Reaching millions: Water, substitute infrastructure, and the politics of scale in Kenya Economic Anthropology How are you, anthropology? Reflections on well-being and the common good “Sometimes it looks fake”: Hiyal and contrivances as tools for exploring aspirations for radical social change Well-being in the context of Indigenous heritage management: A Hach Winik perspective from Metzabok, Chiapas, Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1