Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Versions of the Modified Group Environment Questionnaire and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI:10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414
Tommy Haugen, D. Peters, Y. Ommundsen, Luc J. Martin, A. Stenling, Rune Høigaard
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Versions of the Modified Group Environment Questionnaire and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire","authors":"Tommy Haugen, D. Peters, Y. Ommundsen, Luc J. Martin, A. Stenling, Rune Høigaard","doi":"10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aimed to translate the modified Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (YSEQ) into Norwegian, examine the factor structure and reliability of the scales through independent clusters model confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and examine differential item functioning (DIF) as a function of sex. Three-hundred-and-thirty-three athletes (M(SD)age = 18.7(2.60) years; 33% females) completed the GEQ. Three-hundred-and-three athletes (M(SD)age = 15.0(1.48) years; 26% females) completed the YSEQ. Results indicated acceptable fit indices for a four-factor, a second-order two-factor (task and social), and a second order one-factor ESEM model for the GEQ. Cross-loadings and high latent factor correlations are issues in need of attention. The study supported the structural validity and reliability of the Norwegian YSEQ, with no major differences between the ICM-CFA and ESEM. No evidence of DIF as a function of sex was identified in either of the scales.","PeriodicalId":48577,"journal":{"name":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"365 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2021.1917414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to translate the modified Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ) and the Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire (YSEQ) into Norwegian, examine the factor structure and reliability of the scales through independent clusters model confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and examine differential item functioning (DIF) as a function of sex. Three-hundred-and-thirty-three athletes (M(SD)age = 18.7(2.60) years; 33% females) completed the GEQ. Three-hundred-and-three athletes (M(SD)age = 15.0(1.48) years; 26% females) completed the YSEQ. Results indicated acceptable fit indices for a four-factor, a second-order two-factor (task and social), and a second order one-factor ESEM model for the GEQ. Cross-loadings and high latent factor correlations are issues in need of attention. The study supported the structural validity and reliability of the Norwegian YSEQ, with no major differences between the ICM-CFA and ESEM. No evidence of DIF as a function of sex was identified in either of the scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威版修订团体环境问卷和青少年运动环境问卷的心理测量学评价
摘要本研究旨在将修改后的群体环境问卷(GEQ)和青少年体育环境问卷(YSEQ)翻译成挪威语,通过独立聚类模型验证性因子分析(ICM-CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)检验量表的因子结构和信度,并检验差异项目功能(DIF)作为性别的函数。33名运动员(M(SD)年龄= 18.7(2.60)岁;33%的女性)完成了GEQ。33名运动员(M(SD)年龄= 15.0(1.48)岁;26%女性)完成了YSEQ。结果表明,四因素、二阶两因素(任务和社会)和二阶单因素ESEM模型对GEQ具有可接受的拟合指数。交叉负荷和高潜在因子相关性是需要注意的问题。该研究支持挪威YSEQ的结构效度和可靠性,ICM-CFA和ESEM之间没有重大差异。在这两种量表中都没有发现DIF与性别有关的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The scope of Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science (MPEES) covers original measurement research, special issues, and tutorials within six substantive disciplines of physical education and exercise science. Six of the seven sections of MPEES define the substantive disciplines within the purview of the original research to be published in the journal: Exercise Science, Physical Activity, Physical Education Pedagogy, Psychology, Research Methodology and Statistics, and Sport Management and Administration. The seventh section of MPEES, Tutorial and Teacher’s Toolbox, serves to provide an outlet for review and/or didactic manuscripts to be published in the journal. Special issues provide an avenue for a coherent set of manuscripts (e.g., four to five) to collectively focus in-depth on an important and timely measurement-related issue within the scope of MPEES. The primary aim of MPEES is to publish high-impact manuscripts, most of which will focus on original research, that fit within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Development, Validation, and Reliability of the System for Observing Teaching Competencies in Physical Education (SOTC-PE) Weekly Perceived Exertion is More Sensitive to Detecting Variations in Training Load in Runners Than TRIMP or Running Distance Exploring Students’ Perceived Constraints Support in Physical Education: Measurement Development and Learning Outcomes Direct and Indirect Causal Effects of an Individual Randomized Physical Activity-Promoting Intervention: A Substantive-Methodological Synergy Predictive Validity of Lower Extremity Muscle Strength, Strength Asymmetry, and Soccer-Specific Fitness for Talent Identification in Elite Male Youth Soccer Players: A Retrospective Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1