Board level “Picture-Understanding-Action”: a new way of looking at quality

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Governance Pub Date : 2021-12-23 DOI:10.1108/ijhg-05-2021-0047
Jennifer Martin, M. Flynn, Zuneera Khurshid, J. Fitzsimons, Gemma Moore, P. Crowley
{"title":"Board level “Picture-Understanding-Action”: a new way of looking at quality","authors":"Jennifer Martin, M. Flynn, Zuneera Khurshid, J. Fitzsimons, Gemma Moore, P. Crowley","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-05-2021-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present a quality improvement approach titled “Picture-Understanding-Action” used in Ireland to enhance the role of healthcare boards in the oversight of healthcare quality and its improvement.Design/methodology/approachThe novel and practical “Picture-Understanding-Action” approach was implemented using the Model for Improvement to iteratively introduce changes across three quality improvement projects. This approach outlines the concepts and activities used at each step to support planning and implementation of processes that allow a board to effectively achieve its role in overseeing and improving quality. This approach matured over three quality improvement projects.FindingsThe “Picture” included quantitative and qualitative aspects. The quantitative “Picture” consisted of a quality dashboard/profile of board selected outcome indicators representative of the health system using statistical process control (SPC) charts to focus discussion on real signals of change. The qualitative picture was based on the experience of people who use and work in health services which “people-ised” the numbers. Probing this “Picture” with collective grounding, curiosity and expert training/facilitation developed a shared “Understanding”. This led to “Action(s)” from board members to improve the “Picture” and “Understanding” (feedback action), to ask better questions and make better decisions and recommendations to the executive (feed-forward action). The Model for Improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and a co-design approach in design and implementation were key to success.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time a board has undertaken a quality improvement (QI) project to enhance its own processes. It addresses a gap in research by outlining actions that boards can take to improve their oversight of quality of care.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-05-2021-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present a quality improvement approach titled “Picture-Understanding-Action” used in Ireland to enhance the role of healthcare boards in the oversight of healthcare quality and its improvement.Design/methodology/approachThe novel and practical “Picture-Understanding-Action” approach was implemented using the Model for Improvement to iteratively introduce changes across three quality improvement projects. This approach outlines the concepts and activities used at each step to support planning and implementation of processes that allow a board to effectively achieve its role in overseeing and improving quality. This approach matured over three quality improvement projects.FindingsThe “Picture” included quantitative and qualitative aspects. The quantitative “Picture” consisted of a quality dashboard/profile of board selected outcome indicators representative of the health system using statistical process control (SPC) charts to focus discussion on real signals of change. The qualitative picture was based on the experience of people who use and work in health services which “people-ised” the numbers. Probing this “Picture” with collective grounding, curiosity and expert training/facilitation developed a shared “Understanding”. This led to “Action(s)” from board members to improve the “Picture” and “Understanding” (feedback action), to ask better questions and make better decisions and recommendations to the executive (feed-forward action). The Model for Improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and a co-design approach in design and implementation were key to success.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time a board has undertaken a quality improvement (QI) project to enhance its own processes. It addresses a gap in research by outlining actions that boards can take to improve their oversight of quality of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“图片-理解-行动”:一种看待质量的新方式
目的:本研究的目的是提出一种在爱尔兰使用的题为“图片-理解-行动”的质量改进方法,以加强保健委员会在监督保健质量及其改进方面的作用。设计/方法论/方法新颖实用的“图片-理解-行动”方法是通过使用改进模型在三个质量改进项目中迭代地引入变化来实现的。该方法概述了每一步中使用的概念和活动,以支持流程的规划和实施,从而使董事会有效地实现其监督和改进质量的作用。这种方法在三个质量改进项目中逐渐成熟。调查结果“图片”包括定量和定性两个方面。定量“图片”包括一个质量仪表板/董事会选定的代表卫生系统的结果指标概况,使用统计过程控制(SPC)图表将讨论重点放在变化的实际信号上。定性的情况是根据使用保健服务和在保健服务中工作的人的经验得出的,这些服务使数字“人性化”。通过集体基础、好奇心和专家培训/促进来探索这幅“图片”,形成了一种共同的“理解”。这导致董事会成员采取“行动”来改善“图景”和“理解”(反馈行动),向高管提出更好的问题,做出更好的决策和建议(前馈行动)。改进模式、计划-执行-研究-行动循环以及设计和实施中的协同设计方法是成功的关键。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是董事会第一次开展质量改进(QI)项目来增强自己的流程。它通过概述董事会可以采取的行动来改善对护理质量的监督,解决了研究中的一个空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
期刊最新文献
The response of regional general hospitals in Indonesia to COVID-19 Editorial: Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency IJHG review 28.4 Management of gallstone disease and chronic liver diseases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Ukraine: an ecological study Transforming food systems: a case of Eat Right India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1