Sonographic approach to the tumours of retroperitoneal space

Victor Schiopu, Vasile Ţurcanu, Nicolai Ghidirim
{"title":"Sonographic approach to the tumours of retroperitoneal space","authors":"Victor Schiopu, Vasile Ţurcanu, Nicolai Ghidirim","doi":"10.52418/moldovan-med-j.64-6.21.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Timely diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal tumours is one of the current challenges of clinical oncology. This is due to the rarity, polymorphism and diagnostic difficulties of primitive retroperitoneal tumours. Material and methods: The study is cross-sectional, prospective and retrospective. The study group is represented by 118 patients with abdominal and retroperitoneal space tumours. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve and calculating the average quality of the diagnostic model, the informativeness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal tumours (PRT) was appreciated. Results: For tumour localization, the ultrasonography (USG) as a diagnostic model demonstrated an appropriate use criteria (AUC) of 0.641 (95% CI 0.541, 0.740, p <0.001), and the mean quality of the diagnostic model was 0.54. Following the statistical analysis, was found a partial correlation between the size of the tumour and the dimensions estimated at USG of 0.540 (95% CI 0.295, 0.737, p <0.001), which represents a high positive correlation. To determine the uni- or multicentric character of the tumour, the USG demonstrated an integrative value of sensitivity and specificity of 0.644 (95% CI 0.415, 0.873, p <0.001. In assessing the proximity ratio of retroperitoneal tumours, the highest AUC was recorded in the assessment of the ratio of tumour to pancreas – 0.838 (95% CI 0.705.0.971, p <0.001) and kidney – 0.861 (95% CI 0.699, 1.024, p <0.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonography is a fairly informative imaging diagnostic method in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumours. The characteristics of the tumours obtained after the ultrasound examination provide indirect information about the malignant or benign nature of the primitive tumour, which allows the assessment of the next stages of diagnosis and treatment.","PeriodicalId":32733,"journal":{"name":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Moldovan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52418/moldovan-med-j.64-6.21.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal tumours is one of the current challenges of clinical oncology. This is due to the rarity, polymorphism and diagnostic difficulties of primitive retroperitoneal tumours. Material and methods: The study is cross-sectional, prospective and retrospective. The study group is represented by 118 patients with abdominal and retroperitoneal space tumours. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve and calculating the average quality of the diagnostic model, the informativeness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of primary retroperitoneal tumours (PRT) was appreciated. Results: For tumour localization, the ultrasonography (USG) as a diagnostic model demonstrated an appropriate use criteria (AUC) of 0.641 (95% CI 0.541, 0.740, p <0.001), and the mean quality of the diagnostic model was 0.54. Following the statistical analysis, was found a partial correlation between the size of the tumour and the dimensions estimated at USG of 0.540 (95% CI 0.295, 0.737, p <0.001), which represents a high positive correlation. To determine the uni- or multicentric character of the tumour, the USG demonstrated an integrative value of sensitivity and specificity of 0.644 (95% CI 0.415, 0.873, p <0.001. In assessing the proximity ratio of retroperitoneal tumours, the highest AUC was recorded in the assessment of the ratio of tumour to pancreas – 0.838 (95% CI 0.705.0.971, p <0.001) and kidney – 0.861 (95% CI 0.699, 1.024, p <0.001). Conclusions: Ultrasonography is a fairly informative imaging diagnostic method in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal tumours. The characteristics of the tumours obtained after the ultrasound examination provide indirect information about the malignant or benign nature of the primitive tumour, which allows the assessment of the next stages of diagnosis and treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜后间隙肿瘤的超声入路
背景:及时诊断原发性腹膜后肿瘤是当前临床肿瘤学面临的挑战之一。这是由于原始腹膜后肿瘤的罕见性、多态性和诊断困难。材料和方法:本研究为横断面、前瞻性和回顾性研究。研究组有118名腹部和腹膜后间隙肿瘤患者。使用受试者工作特性(ROC)分析曲线并计算诊断模型的平均质量,可以评价超声在原发性腹膜后肿瘤(PRT)诊断中的信息性。结果:对于肿瘤定位,超声(USG)作为诊断模型的适当使用标准(AUC)为0.641(95%CI 0.541,0.740,p<0.001),诊断模型的平均质量为0.54。根据统计分析,发现肿瘤大小与USG估计的尺寸之间存在部分相关性,为0.540(95%CI 0.295,0.737,p<0.001),这代表了高度的正相关性。为了确定肿瘤的单中心或多中心特征,USG显示出0.644的敏感性和特异性的综合值(95%CI 0.415,0.873,p<0.001)。在评估腹膜后肿瘤的接近率时,肿瘤与胰腺的比值为0.838(95%CI 0.705.0.971,p<0.001),肾脏的比值为-0.861(95%CI 0.699,1.024,p<0.001)。超声检查后获得的肿瘤特征提供了关于原始肿瘤的恶性或良性性质的间接信息,这允许对诊断和治疗的下一阶段进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of the tissue engineering in the obtaining of the biological materials from the extracellular matrix Influence of the cytoprotective drug meldonium on diastolic dysfunction of the myocardium Cephalalgic syndrome in autosomal dominant cerebral arteriopathy with subcortical infarctions and leucoencephalopathy Repair surgical techniques in degenerative cardiac valve disease Ang1 immunoexpression vs vascular profile in chorio-villous germinative status in early term compromised pregnancies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1