Chest Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Etiology of Acute Respiratory Failure

C. Pant, A. Pal, M. Yadav, Bishow Kumar Shrestha, S. Rana
{"title":"Chest Ultrasonography in Diagnosing Etiology of Acute Respiratory Failure","authors":"C. Pant, A. Pal, M. Yadav, Bishow Kumar Shrestha, S. Rana","doi":"10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.26670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is a useful diagnostic tool in critical care setting. Lung ultrasound at bed side is relatively easy to perform, cost effective and reproducible. Analysis of various sign and profile, alone or in combination is as accurate as gold standard test like Computed Tomography scan of the chest in detection of etiology of acute respiratory failure. The aim of our study was to perform bed side lung ultrasound in patent with ARF and to find out the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound when compared with diagnosis made by the clinician. Methods: This descriptive observational study was conducted at tertiary care teaching centre in Nepal between February 2019 and July 2019. Consecutive samples of acute respiratory failure patient were included. Lung ultrasound was performed at bed side by fellows of pulmonary critical care medicine. Specific 10 signs of blue protocol were assessed in six different sites of both the chest. Findings of LUS was recorded and analysed to formulate a diagnosis, and finally compared with the final diagnosis. Results: Forty eight patients of acute respiratory failure with median age of 66 years (17 to 89 years) were included with 66.7% being females. 97.9 % of the patient presented with acute shortness of breath of less than one week duration. A total of 13 different diagnosis was made at the end of the treatment for all the patient. LUS accurately diagnosed them in 43 cases, with an overall accuracy of 89.6 %. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax were accurately diagnosed with LUS however in acute respiratory distress syndrome and interstitial lung disease, lung ultrasound had poor diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: Lung ultrasound is useful tool in diagnosing etiology of acute respiratory failure. Diagnosis made by lung ultrasound was 89.6% correct when compared with final diagnosis made by clinician.","PeriodicalId":33963,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","volume":"19 1","pages":"20-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.26670","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v19i1.26670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is a useful diagnostic tool in critical care setting. Lung ultrasound at bed side is relatively easy to perform, cost effective and reproducible. Analysis of various sign and profile, alone or in combination is as accurate as gold standard test like Computed Tomography scan of the chest in detection of etiology of acute respiratory failure. The aim of our study was to perform bed side lung ultrasound in patent with ARF and to find out the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound when compared with diagnosis made by the clinician. Methods: This descriptive observational study was conducted at tertiary care teaching centre in Nepal between February 2019 and July 2019. Consecutive samples of acute respiratory failure patient were included. Lung ultrasound was performed at bed side by fellows of pulmonary critical care medicine. Specific 10 signs of blue protocol were assessed in six different sites of both the chest. Findings of LUS was recorded and analysed to formulate a diagnosis, and finally compared with the final diagnosis. Results: Forty eight patients of acute respiratory failure with median age of 66 years (17 to 89 years) were included with 66.7% being females. 97.9 % of the patient presented with acute shortness of breath of less than one week duration. A total of 13 different diagnosis was made at the end of the treatment for all the patient. LUS accurately diagnosed them in 43 cases, with an overall accuracy of 89.6 %. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary edema, pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax were accurately diagnosed with LUS however in acute respiratory distress syndrome and interstitial lung disease, lung ultrasound had poor diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: Lung ultrasound is useful tool in diagnosing etiology of acute respiratory failure. Diagnosis made by lung ultrasound was 89.6% correct when compared with final diagnosis made by clinician.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸部超声诊断急性呼吸衰竭病因
简介:肺超声(LUS)是一种有用的诊断工具,在重症监护设置。床边肺超声相对容易操作,成本效益高,可重复性好。在诊断急性呼吸衰竭的病因方面,单独或联合分析各种体征和特征与胸部计算机断层扫描等金标准检查一样准确。我们的研究目的是利用ARF进行床侧肺超声,并与临床医生的诊断进行比较,以确定肺超声诊断的准确性。方法:本描述性观察研究于2019年2月至2019年7月在尼泊尔三级保健教学中心进行。纳入急性呼吸衰竭患者的连续样本。肺超声由肺重症医学研究员在床旁进行。在两个胸部的六个不同部位评估了蓝色协议的具体10个迹象。记录和分析LUS的表现,制定诊断,最后与最终诊断进行比较。结果:纳入48例急性呼吸衰竭患者,中位年龄66岁(17 ~ 89岁),其中66.7%为女性。97.9%的患者表现为急性呼吸短促,持续时间不超过一周。在治疗结束时,对所有患者进行了13种不同的诊断。LUS准确诊断43例,总体准确率为89.6%。慢性阻塞性肺疾病、肺水肿、肺炎、胸腔积液、气胸对LUS的诊断准确率较高,但对急性呼吸窘迫综合征和间质性肺疾病的诊断准确率较低。结论:肺超声是诊断急性呼吸衰竭病因的有效工具。与临床医生最终诊断相比,肺超声诊断的正确率为89.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective study to Analyze the Outcomes of Paediatric Pyeloplasty in Poorly Functioning Kidneys Visual Function at High Altitude in Nepal A Case of Hydropyometra Secondary to Vaginal Atresia: A Case Report Endovascular Management of a Rare Case of a True Facial Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report Spectrum of Neurological cases in OPD of Tertiary Paediatric care Center of Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1