{"title":"Composite bias-reduced \n \n \n \n L\n \n \n p\n \n \n -quantile-based estimators of extreme quantiles and expectiles","authors":"Gilles Stupfler, Antoine Usseglio-Carleve","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantiles are a fundamental concept in extreme value theory. They can be obtained from a minimization framework using an asymmetric absolute error loss criterion. The companion notion of expectiles, based on asymmetric squared rather than asymmetric absolute error loss minimization, has received substantial attention from the fields of actuarial science, finance, and econometrics over the last decade. Quantiles and expectiles can be embedded in a common framework of <math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>-quantiles, whose extreme value properties have been explored very recently. Although this generalized notion of quantiles has shown potential for the estimation of extreme quantiles and expectiles, available estimators remain quite difficult to use: they suffer from substantial bias, and the question of the choice of the tuning parameter <math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow></math> remains open. In this article, we work in a context of heavy tails and construct composite bias-reduced estimators of extreme quantiles and expectiles based on <math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>-quantiles. We provide a discussion of the data-driven choice of <math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow></math> and of the anchor <math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mi>p</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>-quantile level in practice. The proposed methodology is compared with existing approaches on simulated data and real data.</p>","PeriodicalId":55281,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11703","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Quantiles are a fundamental concept in extreme value theory. They can be obtained from a minimization framework using an asymmetric absolute error loss criterion. The companion notion of expectiles, based on asymmetric squared rather than asymmetric absolute error loss minimization, has received substantial attention from the fields of actuarial science, finance, and econometrics over the last decade. Quantiles and expectiles can be embedded in a common framework of -quantiles, whose extreme value properties have been explored very recently. Although this generalized notion of quantiles has shown potential for the estimation of extreme quantiles and expectiles, available estimators remain quite difficult to use: they suffer from substantial bias, and the question of the choice of the tuning parameter remains open. In this article, we work in a context of heavy tails and construct composite bias-reduced estimators of extreme quantiles and expectiles based on -quantiles. We provide a discussion of the data-driven choice of and of the anchor -quantile level in practice. The proposed methodology is compared with existing approaches on simulated data and real data.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Statistics is the official journal of the Statistical Society of Canada. It has a reputation internationally as an excellent journal. The editorial board is comprised of statistical scientists with applied, computational, methodological, theoretical and probabilistic interests. Their role is to ensure that the journal continues to provide an international forum for the discipline of Statistics.
The journal seeks papers making broad points of interest to many readers, whereas papers making important points of more specific interest are better placed in more specialized journals. The levels of innovation and impact are key in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.