A numerical comparative study of completion methods for pairwise comparison matrices

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2023.100272
Hailemariam Abebe Tekile, Matteo Brunelli, Michele Fedrizzi
{"title":"A numerical comparative study of completion methods for pairwise comparison matrices","authors":"Hailemariam Abebe Tekile,&nbsp;Matteo Brunelli,&nbsp;Michele Fedrizzi","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2023.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the context of some multi-criteria decision-making methods, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process, an expert is required to compare entities, e.g. alternatives and criteria. However, often, for various reasons, the expert cannot provide judgments on all pairs of entities. For these cases, several completion methods have been proposed in the literature to estimate the missing values of pairwise comparison matrices. In this paper, we study the similarity of eleven completion methods on the basis of numerical simulations and hierarchical clustering. We perform simulations for matrices of different orders considering various numbers of missing comparisons. Finally, the results suggest the existence of a cluster of five extremely similar methods, and a method significantly dissimilar from all the others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716023000076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the context of some multi-criteria decision-making methods, such as the Analytic Hierarchy Process, an expert is required to compare entities, e.g. alternatives and criteria. However, often, for various reasons, the expert cannot provide judgments on all pairs of entities. For these cases, several completion methods have been proposed in the literature to estimate the missing values of pairwise comparison matrices. In this paper, we study the similarity of eleven completion methods on the basis of numerical simulations and hierarchical clustering. We perform simulations for matrices of different orders considering various numbers of missing comparisons. Finally, the results suggest the existence of a cluster of five extremely similar methods, and a method significantly dissimilar from all the others.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两两比较矩阵补全方法的数值比较研究
在一些多准则决策方法中,例如层次分析法,需要专家来比较实体,例如备选方案和标准。然而,由于各种原因,专家往往不能对所有实体对提供判断。针对这些情况,文献中提出了几种补全方法来估计两两比较矩阵的缺失值。本文在数值模拟和分层聚类的基础上,研究了11种补全方法的相似度。考虑到不同数量的缺失比较,我们对不同阶的矩阵进行了模拟。最后,结果表明存在一个由五种非常相似的方法组成的集群,以及一种与所有其他方法明显不同的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system Distributional robustness based on Wasserstein-metric approach for humanitarian logistics problem under road disruptions A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Competitive pricing and seed node selection in a two-echelon supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1