Ordering decisions under supply uncertainty and inventory record inaccuracy: An experimental investigation

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT DECISION SCIENCES Pub Date : 2022-05-03 DOI:10.1111/deci.12564
Nienke Hofstra, Eirini Spiliotopoulou, Sander de Leeuw
{"title":"Ordering decisions under supply uncertainty and inventory record inaccuracy: An experimental investigation","authors":"Nienke Hofstra,&nbsp;Eirini Spiliotopoulou,&nbsp;Sander de Leeuw","doi":"10.1111/deci.12564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Uncertainty on the supply side is a common issue planners face. How do decision-makers incorporate inventory uncertainty when placing orders? We investigate ordering decisions under two forms of uncertainty regarding total inventory available to satisfy demand: supply uncertainty (SU; unreliability in incoming shipments) and inventory record inaccuracy (IRI; internal inefficiencies leading to a discrepancy between physical and recorded inventories). The experimental results reveal behavioral regularities in ordering decisions under both forms of total inventory uncertainty. We find that subjects overstock in settings with low profit margins, and overstocking is more pronounced under IRI than under SU. This overstocking under low profit margins is similar to observed ordering decisions under demand uncertainty. In these settings, subjects show a stronger shortage aversion under IRI (which is internal uncertainty) than under SU (which is external uncertainty). Furthermore, we find that subjects chase past realizations of supply/on-hand inventory, although the effect depends on the uncertainty type. Although SU and IRI are, in practice, often simultaneously present, their causes are different. By providing insight into the relative effect of the types of uncertainty on the quality of inventory replenishment decisions, this study highlights the importance of reducing SU and IRI for products with low profit margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 3","pages":"303-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/deci.12564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty on the supply side is a common issue planners face. How do decision-makers incorporate inventory uncertainty when placing orders? We investigate ordering decisions under two forms of uncertainty regarding total inventory available to satisfy demand: supply uncertainty (SU; unreliability in incoming shipments) and inventory record inaccuracy (IRI; internal inefficiencies leading to a discrepancy between physical and recorded inventories). The experimental results reveal behavioral regularities in ordering decisions under both forms of total inventory uncertainty. We find that subjects overstock in settings with low profit margins, and overstocking is more pronounced under IRI than under SU. This overstocking under low profit margins is similar to observed ordering decisions under demand uncertainty. In these settings, subjects show a stronger shortage aversion under IRI (which is internal uncertainty) than under SU (which is external uncertainty). Furthermore, we find that subjects chase past realizations of supply/on-hand inventory, although the effect depends on the uncertainty type. Although SU and IRI are, in practice, often simultaneously present, their causes are different. By providing insight into the relative effect of the types of uncertainty on the quality of inventory replenishment decisions, this study highlights the importance of reducing SU and IRI for products with low profit margins.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应不确定和库存记录不准确下的订货决策:一项实验研究
供应方面的不确定性是计划人员面临的一个共同问题。决策者在下订单时如何考虑库存的不确定性?我们研究了在满足需求的总库存存在两种不确定性情况下的订货决策:供应不确定性(SU;进货不可靠)和库存记录不准确性(IRI;内部效率低下导致实物库存和记录库存不一致)。实验结果揭示了在这两种形式的总库存不确定性下订购决策的行为规律性。我们发现,在利润率较低的情况下,受试者会超量存货,而且 IRI 下的超量存货比 SU 下更明显。低利润率下的超量库存与观察到的需求不确定性下的订货决策类似。在这些情况下,与 SU(外部不确定性)相比,受试者在 IRI(内部不确定性)下表现出更强的短缺厌恶。此外,我们还发现受试者会追逐过去实现的供应/在手库存,尽管这种影响取决于不确定性类型。虽然在实践中,SU 和 IRI 经常同时存在,但它们的成因是不同的。通过深入了解不确定性类型对库存补充决策质量的相对影响,本研究强调了减少 SU 和 IRI 对低利润率产品的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information IN THIS ISSUE Issue Information In this issue Explanation seeking and anomalous recommendation adherence in human-to-human versus human-to-artificial intelligence interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1