Aligning SDG 13 with South Africa’s development agenda: Adaptation policies and institutional frameworks

IF 1.3 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI:10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1155
Dumisani E Mthembu, G. Nhamo
{"title":"Aligning SDG 13 with South Africa’s development agenda: Adaptation policies and institutional frameworks","authors":"Dumisani E Mthembu, G. Nhamo","doi":"10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The alignment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with national development agendas has gained traction since the ratification of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in September 2015. This article investigates how South Africa has aligned the climate action SDG (SDG 13) with its national development agenda, with an emphasis on adaptation policies and institutional framework. This comes against a background where the country has been accused of bias towards mitigation policies that were trigged by the Long-Term Mitigation Scenarios in 2007, which could have quickened mitigation responses to SDG 13. The data were generated through the use of three key methods, namely key informant interviews (n = 21), an online survey uploaded on an online platform called QuestionPro and a realised sample of 103 completed surveys. Furthermore, relevant policy documents were analysed from a critical discourse perspective. It emerged that South Africa has policies and strategies in place to respond to climate change adaptation within the context of SDG 13. However, while policies are in place, they have not translated to real change on the ground and therefore have not enabled the country to have adequate climate change resilience. The policies have not been translated into concrete actions; there are knowledge gaps in adaptation, poor leadership and lack of clear vision for adaptation and poor coordination. Institutions are scattered, with uneven capacity across sectors and different spheres of government; and weakest at the local government level. It also emerged that mitigation was prioritised for a while over adaptation, with a lack of funding and general awareness. The study recommends that adaptation measures should not be undertaken in isolation, instead, it should be addressed within the context of other programmes such as disaster risk management and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":51823,"journal":{"name":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The alignment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with national development agendas has gained traction since the ratification of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in September 2015. This article investigates how South Africa has aligned the climate action SDG (SDG 13) with its national development agenda, with an emphasis on adaptation policies and institutional framework. This comes against a background where the country has been accused of bias towards mitigation policies that were trigged by the Long-Term Mitigation Scenarios in 2007, which could have quickened mitigation responses to SDG 13. The data were generated through the use of three key methods, namely key informant interviews (n = 21), an online survey uploaded on an online platform called QuestionPro and a realised sample of 103 completed surveys. Furthermore, relevant policy documents were analysed from a critical discourse perspective. It emerged that South Africa has policies and strategies in place to respond to climate change adaptation within the context of SDG 13. However, while policies are in place, they have not translated to real change on the ground and therefore have not enabled the country to have adequate climate change resilience. The policies have not been translated into concrete actions; there are knowledge gaps in adaptation, poor leadership and lack of clear vision for adaptation and poor coordination. Institutions are scattered, with uneven capacity across sectors and different spheres of government; and weakest at the local government level. It also emerged that mitigation was prioritised for a while over adaptation, with a lack of funding and general awareness. The study recommends that adaptation measures should not be undertaken in isolation, instead, it should be addressed within the context of other programmes such as disaster risk management and sustainable development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使可持续发展目标13与南非发展议程保持一致:适应政策和体制框架
自2015年9月批准《2030年可持续发展议程》以来,可持续发展目标与国家发展议程的一致性得到了推动。本文调查了南非如何将气候行动可持续发展目标(SDG 13)与其国家发展议程相一致,重点是适应政策和体制框架。这是在该国被指控对2007年长期缓解情景引发的缓解政策存在偏见的背景下发生的,该情景本可以加快对可持续发展目标13的缓解反应。数据是通过使用三种关键方法生成的,即关键线人访谈(n=21)、上传到名为QuestionPro的在线平台上的在线调查以及103项已完成调查的实际样本。此外,还从批判性话语的角度分析了相关政策文件。据了解,南非制定了在可持续发展目标13范围内应对气候变化适应的政策和战略。然而,尽管政策已经到位,但它们并没有转化为当地的真正变化,因此也没有使该国具备足够的应对气候变化的能力。这些政策尚未转化为具体行动;在适应方面存在知识差距,领导不力,缺乏明确的适应愿景,协调不力。机构分散,各部门和政府不同领域的能力参差不齐;而在地方政府层面则最弱。此外,由于缺乏资金和普遍认识,缓解措施一度被优先于适应。研究报告建议,不应孤立地采取适应措施,而应在灾害风险管理和可持续发展等其他方案的范围内加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
Jamba-Journal of Disaster Risk Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efundja as a risk driver and change agent for the Cuvelai-Etosha basin rural communities. Revealing the boon and bane of South Africa's disaster management legislation during COVID-19. A tool for the assessment of the risk drivers and public perception of WASH in South Africa. Statutory and policy-based eco-disaster risk reduction in SADC member states. Disaster risk from diarrhoeal diseases and WASH in South Africa and Botswana in MDG time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1