Party crashers: issues in identifying parties and others bound by arbitration agreements

Q3 Social Sciences Arbitration International Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1093/arbint/aiac008
S. Allison, Kanaga Dharmananda
{"title":"Party crashers: issues in identifying parties and others bound by arbitration agreements","authors":"S. Allison, Kanaga Dharmananda","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiac008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The determination of the law governing arbitration agreements has been the subject of recent close attention. The relationship of third parties to arbitration agreements is sensitive to an increasingly unwieldly array of factors, including the subject matter of a dispute, the nature of the purported basis for the transfer of an arbitration agreement, and the wording of the original instrument containing the arbitration clause. A rising question is whether third parties are to be considered parties or non-parties otherwise bound by arbitration agreements. In addition, there is an issue of timing: when are the arbitration agreements or relevant awards to be impugned, and does the third-party issue pertain to the validity or just the scope of an arbitration agreement. This article seeks to address these issues.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitration International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of the law governing arbitration agreements has been the subject of recent close attention. The relationship of third parties to arbitration agreements is sensitive to an increasingly unwieldly array of factors, including the subject matter of a dispute, the nature of the purported basis for the transfer of an arbitration agreement, and the wording of the original instrument containing the arbitration clause. A rising question is whether third parties are to be considered parties or non-parties otherwise bound by arbitration agreements. In addition, there is an issue of timing: when are the arbitration agreements or relevant awards to be impugned, and does the third-party issue pertain to the validity or just the scope of an arbitration agreement. This article seeks to address these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当事人不速之客:确定当事人和受仲裁协议约束的其他人的问题
仲裁协议管辖法律的确定是最近密切关注的主题。第三方与仲裁协议的关系对一系列越来越难以处理的因素很敏感,这些因素包括争议的标的、所谓的仲裁协议转让依据的性质,以及载有仲裁条款的原始文书的措辞。一个日益突出的问题是,第三方是否应被视为受仲裁协议约束的当事方或非当事方。此外,还有一个时间问题:仲裁协议或相关裁决何时受到质疑,第三方问题是否与仲裁协议的有效性或范围有关。本文试图解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arbitration International
Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.
期刊最新文献
The temptation of Occam’s Razor: jurisdiction, admissibility and party autonomy The participation of foreign counsel in Nigeria-seated arbitration proceedings How to assess the res judicata effects of international arbitral awards: giving concreteness to an autonomous approach Confidentiality and privacy of arbitration in the digital era: pies in the sky? Enforcing intra-EU ICSID arbitration awards in a post-Achmea world in Europe: could the European Court of Human Rights assist in resolving the deadlock?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1