Molecular Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility Profiles of Non-albicans Candida Species Clinical Isolates

K. Diba, K. Makhdoomi, Shima Aboutalebian
{"title":"Molecular Identification and Antifungal \nSusceptibility Profiles of Non-albicans Candida\nSpecies Clinical Isolates","authors":"K. Diba, K. Makhdoomi, Shima Aboutalebian","doi":"10.33590/emjmicrobiolinfectdis/20-00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is an increasing incidence of life-threatening systemic mycoses, specifically fulminant infections by the Candida species in hospitalised patients and in those who are immunocompromised. Management of the limited number of antifungal drugs currently available requires the identification of infections containing drug-resistant isolates.\n\nObjectives: The aim of this study was to identify the non-albicans Candida species as azole-resistant fungi, isolated from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of hospitalised cases.\n\nMethods: The subjects included hospital-acquired infection (HAI) cases, with a primary diagnosis using a direct microscopic examination, performed for the detection of probable fungi. The molecular tests of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and real-time PCR were performed to confirm the identity and molecular typing of the Candida isolates. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (M27-A2) method, was performed on the hospital-isolated\nCandida species.\n\nResults: During 24 months, from August 2014 to September 2016, a total of 198 samples were obtained from cases with proven HAI. The results of experimental studies on the specimens showed 93 (47%) positive cases for a fungal or bacterial infection, of which 54 (58%) had a fungal infection. It was hypothesised that all of the isolated organisms were causative agents of the HAI.\n\nConclusions: The results showed that the medium CHROMagar™ Candida is an accessible and easy-to-use method for the identification of infection, but not as accurate and reliable as PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR methods. Results also showed decreasing susceptibility to azoles (itraconazole in this study) of the Candida species.","PeriodicalId":72900,"journal":{"name":"EMJ. Microbiology & infectious diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ. Microbiology & infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjmicrobiolinfectdis/20-00034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an increasing incidence of life-threatening systemic mycoses, specifically fulminant infections by the Candida species in hospitalised patients and in those who are immunocompromised. Management of the limited number of antifungal drugs currently available requires the identification of infections containing drug-resistant isolates. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the non-albicans Candida species as azole-resistant fungi, isolated from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of hospitalised cases. Methods: The subjects included hospital-acquired infection (HAI) cases, with a primary diagnosis using a direct microscopic examination, performed for the detection of probable fungi. The molecular tests of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and real-time PCR were performed to confirm the identity and molecular typing of the Candida isolates. Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (M27-A2) method, was performed on the hospital-isolated Candida species. Results: During 24 months, from August 2014 to September 2016, a total of 198 samples were obtained from cases with proven HAI. The results of experimental studies on the specimens showed 93 (47%) positive cases for a fungal or bacterial infection, of which 54 (58%) had a fungal infection. It was hypothesised that all of the isolated organisms were causative agents of the HAI. Conclusions: The results showed that the medium CHROMagar™ Candida is an accessible and easy-to-use method for the identification of infection, but not as accurate and reliable as PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR methods. Results also showed decreasing susceptibility to azoles (itraconazole in this study) of the Candida species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非白色念珠菌临床分离株的分子鉴定及抗真菌敏感性分析
背景:危及生命的全身性真菌病的发病率正在增加,特别是住院患者和免疫功能低下患者中念珠菌物种的暴发性感染。管理目前可用的有限数量的抗真菌药物需要识别含有耐药分离株的感染。目的:本研究的目的是鉴定从住院病例的痰液和支气管肺泡灌洗液标本中分离出的非白色念珠菌属抗唑真菌。方法:研究对象包括医院获得性感染(HAI)病例,通过直接显微镜检查进行初步诊断,以检测可能的真菌。采用PCR-限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)和实时荧光定量PCR对分离的念珠菌进行鉴定和分子分型。采用临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)肉汤微量稀释(BMD)最低抑菌浓度(MIC) (M27-A2)法对医院分离的念珠菌进行抗真菌药敏试验(AFST)。结果:2014年8月至2016年9月24个月内,共采集确诊HAI病例198份样本。标本实验研究结果显示,真菌或细菌感染阳性93例(47%),其中真菌感染54例(58%)。假设所有分离的生物都是HAI的病原体。结论:培养基CHROMagar™念珠菌是一种易于使用的感染鉴定方法,但不如PCR- rflp和real-time PCR方法准确可靠。结果还显示念珠菌对唑类药物(本研究为伊曲康唑)的敏感性降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ECCMID 2023 Abstract Highlights Clostridioides difficile Infection: Targeting an Unwelcome and Persistent Threat SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup B Invasive Infections: Insights From Italian Surveillance Data and Vaccination Rates Providing Expert Consultation in a World Living with COVID-19 Interview: Anne L. Wyllie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1