A Science of Letters? Forms of “Normal Science” in the Late Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Humanities

Q2 Arts and Humanities History of Humanities Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1086/723946
F. Solleveld
{"title":"A Science of Letters? Forms of “Normal Science” in the Late Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Humanities","authors":"F. Solleveld","doi":"10.1086/723946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Was there anything like “normal science” in the early modern humanities? The term humanities itself, though going back to early humanist studia humanitatis, is problematic to use for early modern scholarship, since it mainly indicated a (propaedeutic) curriculum. What we now call the humanities were known in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as “letters.” Different, overlapping container notions were also in use: rhetoric and belles-lettres, schöne Wissenschaften, critique, erudition. Early modern scholarship was organized by genre rather than by discipline, but the genres themselves were unstable. To what extent, then, can one identify examples that represent normal scholarly practice, standards for what counted as “knowledge,” common ways of “puzzle-solving”? This article consecutively explores four aspects: (1) textbooks that identified the object of knowledge, (2) the normative example of early modern philology, (3) practices of “puzzle-solving” in antiquarianism, and (4) perceived discrepancies in historical scholarship between the classical example and the practice of compilation.","PeriodicalId":36904,"journal":{"name":"History of Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/723946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Was there anything like “normal science” in the early modern humanities? The term humanities itself, though going back to early humanist studia humanitatis, is problematic to use for early modern scholarship, since it mainly indicated a (propaedeutic) curriculum. What we now call the humanities were known in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as “letters.” Different, overlapping container notions were also in use: rhetoric and belles-lettres, schöne Wissenschaften, critique, erudition. Early modern scholarship was organized by genre rather than by discipline, but the genres themselves were unstable. To what extent, then, can one identify examples that represent normal scholarly practice, standards for what counted as “knowledge,” common ways of “puzzle-solving”? This article consecutively explores four aspects: (1) textbooks that identified the object of knowledge, (2) the normative example of early modern philology, (3) practices of “puzzle-solving” in antiquarianism, and (4) perceived discrepancies in historical scholarship between the classical example and the practice of compilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学科学?17世纪晚期和18世纪人文学科中“常态科学”的形式
在早期的现代人文学科中有类似“正常科学”的东西吗?人文学科这个术语本身,虽然可以追溯到早期的人文主义研究,但在早期现代学术中使用是有问题的,因为它主要表示(宣传)课程。我们现在所说的人文学科在17和18世纪被称为“文学”。不同的,重叠的容器概念也在使用:修辞和美丽的字母,schöne Wissenschaften,批判,博学。早期现代学术是按流派而不是按学科来组织的,但流派本身是不稳定的。那么,一个人能在多大程度上找出代表正常学术实践的例子、所谓“知识”的标准、“解谜”的常见方法呢?本文从四个方面进行了探讨:(1)确定知识对象的教科书;(2)早期现代文献学的规范范例;(3)古物学中的“解谜”实践;(4)经典范例与编撰实践之间的历史学术差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Humanities
History of Humanities Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Reading Eric Hayot, Rens Bod, and Lorraine Daston on What the Humanities Do :The Orient in Utrecht: Adriaan Reland (1676–1718), Arabist, Cartographer, Antiquarian and Scholar of Comparative Religion Writing and Reading Today: The History of the Humanities Tomorrow How Diverse Is the History of the Humanities and Does It Matter? Notes on Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1