Divided Audience and Figured Speech in Cicero's Pro Balbo

IF 0.6 1区 历史学 0 CLASSICS AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2021-04-08 DOI:10.1353/AJP.2021.0002
Joanna Kenty
{"title":"Divided Audience and Figured Speech in Cicero's Pro Balbo","authors":"Joanna Kenty","doi":"10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Ancient rhetorical theorists described figured speech (oratio figurata) as a strategy for expressing criticism safely, through a screen of ambiguity. I argue that Cicero's Pro Balbo can be read as figured, communicating criticism of Pompey. Cicero's panegyric to Pompey in this speech would have appeared to be factually accurate and commendable to pro-Pompeian members of the audience, but factually wrong or even insincere to anti-Pompeians. Multiple readings of Cicero's intentions are latent as possible interpretations of the speech because of political divisions and divergent prejudices at the time of its delivery.","PeriodicalId":46128,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":"142 1","pages":"101 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AJP.2021.0002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Ancient rhetorical theorists described figured speech (oratio figurata) as a strategy for expressing criticism safely, through a screen of ambiguity. I argue that Cicero's Pro Balbo can be read as figured, communicating criticism of Pompey. Cicero's panegyric to Pompey in this speech would have appeared to be factually accurate and commendable to pro-Pompeian members of the audience, but factually wrong or even insincere to anti-Pompeians. Multiple readings of Cicero's intentions are latent as possible interpretations of the speech because of political divisions and divergent prejudices at the time of its delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西塞罗的《赞成巴尔博》中分裂的听众和修辞的演讲
摘要:古代修辞学理论家将修辞修辞描述为一种通过模糊的屏障安全地表达批评的策略。我认为西塞罗的《赞成巴尔博》可以被解读为形象,传达了对庞培的批评。西塞罗在演讲中对庞培的赞美诗,对于支持庞培的听众来说,实际上是准确的,值得赞扬的,但对于反对庞培的听众来说,实际上是错误的,甚至是不真诚的。对西塞罗意图的多重解读是潜在的,可能的解释,因为政治分歧和不同的偏见,在演讲的时候。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.
期刊最新文献
The Body of the Meretrix and the Sexualization of Simo's House in Plautus' Mostellaria Alogos Aesthesis and the Sense of Taste Scribere Iussit Amor: Phaedra, Love, and (Roman) Law in Ovid's Heroides 4 The Exemplarity of Marcellus in Punica 14 Nice Guys Finish First: Xenophon on Exhortations and Their Limits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1