Evaluation of the Decision-Making Mode during Digestive Oncology Multidisciplinary Meetings: a Prospective Study in a Moroccan Center

C. Charoui, A. Souadka, S. Saber, R. Latib, L. Rifai, L. Amrani, A. Benkabbou, R. Mohsine, M. Majbar
{"title":"Evaluation of the Decision-Making Mode during Digestive Oncology Multidisciplinary Meetings: a Prospective Study in a Moroccan Center","authors":"C. Charoui, A. Souadka, S. Saber, R. Latib, L. Rifai, L. Amrani, A. Benkabbou, R. Mohsine, M. Majbar","doi":"10.46327/msrjg.1.000000000000169bis","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The multidisciplinary team oncology meeting (MDT) has become a standard in oncology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of a validated tool, the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making, in the evaluation of the decision-making mode during the digestive cancer MDT in order to reach recommendations for improvement.\n\nResults: Eight consecutive MDTs were observed (N = 228 patients). On average, 32 patients were discussed by MDT with an average of 2 min 55 s (interval: 30 s-10 min 16 s) per patient. A decision was reached in 84.6% of the cases. Although the medical information was judged to be of good quality, the psychosocial information (average 1.29) and the patients' point of view (average 1.03) were judged to be of low quality. For teamwork, the contribution of surgeons (average 4.56) and oncologists (average 3.99) was greater than radiologists (3.12), radiotherapists (1.74) and pathologists (1.02).\n\nConclusions: The tool made it possible to identify a disparity in the quality of the different aspects of the information and in the participation of specialists, making it possible to identify specific improvement measures. Its regular use would improve the quality of patient care.\n\nKeywords: Decision making, Quality improvement, Multidisciplinary Concertation meeting, MDT-MODe, Morocco","PeriodicalId":41186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical and Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical and Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46327/msrjg.1.000000000000169bis","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: The multidisciplinary team oncology meeting (MDT) has become a standard in oncology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of a validated tool, the Metric for the Observation of Decision-Making, in the evaluation of the decision-making mode during the digestive cancer MDT in order to reach recommendations for improvement. Results: Eight consecutive MDTs were observed (N = 228 patients). On average, 32 patients were discussed by MDT with an average of 2 min 55 s (interval: 30 s-10 min 16 s) per patient. A decision was reached in 84.6% of the cases. Although the medical information was judged to be of good quality, the psychosocial information (average 1.29) and the patients' point of view (average 1.03) were judged to be of low quality. For teamwork, the contribution of surgeons (average 4.56) and oncologists (average 3.99) was greater than radiologists (3.12), radiotherapists (1.74) and pathologists (1.02). Conclusions: The tool made it possible to identify a disparity in the quality of the different aspects of the information and in the participation of specialists, making it possible to identify specific improvement measures. Its regular use would improve the quality of patient care. Keywords: Decision making, Quality improvement, Multidisciplinary Concertation meeting, MDT-MODe, Morocco
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消化肿瘤多学科会议决策模式的评估:摩洛哥中心的一项前瞻性研究
多学科肿瘤学小组会议(MDT)已成为肿瘤学的标准会议。本研究的目的是评估一种经过验证的工具——决策观察指标(Metric for The Observation of decision)在评估消化道肿瘤MDT期间决策模式中的价值,以提出改进建议。结果:连续观察8例MDTs (N = 228例)。平均32例患者接受MDT讨论,平均每例患者2分钟55秒(间隔30秒-10分钟16秒)。审结率为84.6%。虽然医学信息质量较好,但心理社会信息(平均1.29)和患者观点(平均1.03)的质量较低。在团队合作方面,外科医生(平均4.56)和肿瘤科医生(平均3.99)的贡献高于放射科医生(3.12)、放射治疗师(1.74)和病理学家(1.02)。结论:该工具可以确定信息的不同方面的质量和专家参与的差异,从而可以确定具体的改进措施。它的定期使用将提高病人护理的质量。关键词:决策,质量改进,多学科集中会议,mdt模式,摩洛哥
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Short-Term and Long-Term outcomes of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Predictors of Poor Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid after 1 Year of Treatment in Moroccan Patients The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center Study. Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Pleura: A Simple Solution with a Simple Technique Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Workers in Morocco: Results of a Cross Sectional Survey .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1