Wound dressings for leg ulcers in Germany: Distribution, regional variations and health care providers

Q1 Medicine Wound Medicine Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.009
Kristina Hagenström , Kerstin Protz , Gerd Glaeske , Matthias Augustin
{"title":"Wound dressings for leg ulcers in Germany: Distribution, regional variations and health care providers","authors":"Kristina Hagenström ,&nbsp;Kerstin Protz ,&nbsp;Gerd Glaeske ,&nbsp;Matthias Augustin","doi":"10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although there are standards in guideline-compliant treatment<span> of chronic wounds, little is known about the use of wound dressings in Germany.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of the longitudinal study was to analyze the use of wound dressings, to explore regional differences and to characterize prescriptions by different physician specialties in patients<span> with leg ulcers in Germany.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Wound dressing rates for incident leg ulcers were analyzed from a German statutory health insurance between 2010 and 2012.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From 2010 to 2012, out of 7,248,644 insured persons 0.52% [95%-CI 0.51–0.52%] were identified as having an incident ulcer. 76.0% were treated with hydroactive wound dressings. By contrast, in 23.7% only non-hydroactive dressings were used, and more often prescribed in venous (24.0%) than in mixed leg ulcers (20.8%). Most frequently used products were foam dressings (49.7%), followed by gauze compresses (29.5%). Wound specialized physicians had the highest overall proportion of prescriptions (60.2%) and a slightly higher proportion of non-hydroactive wound dressings. Large regional variations were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In Germany, a high level of use of hydroactive wound dressings in leg ulcers and marked regional variations were found.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38278,"journal":{"name":"Wound Medicine","volume":"23 ","pages":"Pages 58-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wndm.2018.09.009","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221390951830048X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Although there are standards in guideline-compliant treatment of chronic wounds, little is known about the use of wound dressings in Germany.

Objective

The objective of the longitudinal study was to analyze the use of wound dressings, to explore regional differences and to characterize prescriptions by different physician specialties in patients with leg ulcers in Germany.

Methods

Wound dressing rates for incident leg ulcers were analyzed from a German statutory health insurance between 2010 and 2012.

Results

From 2010 to 2012, out of 7,248,644 insured persons 0.52% [95%-CI 0.51–0.52%] were identified as having an incident ulcer. 76.0% were treated with hydroactive wound dressings. By contrast, in 23.7% only non-hydroactive dressings were used, and more often prescribed in venous (24.0%) than in mixed leg ulcers (20.8%). Most frequently used products were foam dressings (49.7%), followed by gauze compresses (29.5%). Wound specialized physicians had the highest overall proportion of prescriptions (60.2%) and a slightly higher proportion of non-hydroactive wound dressings. Large regional variations were observed.

Conclusion

In Germany, a high level of use of hydroactive wound dressings in leg ulcers and marked regional variations were found.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国腿部溃疡伤口敷料:分布、地区差异和卫生保健提供者
背景:虽然在慢性伤口的治疗中有符合指南的标准,但在德国,人们对伤口敷料的使用知之甚少。目的纵向研究的目的是分析伤口敷料的使用,探讨区域差异,并表征德国不同医师专业的腿部溃疡患者的处方。方法分析2010 - 2012年德国某法定健康保险中腿部溃疡的伤口包扎率。结果2010 - 2012年,在7248644名参保人员中,有0.52% [95%-CI 0.51-0.52%]被确定患有偶发性溃疡。76.0%的患者使用了水活性创面敷料。相比之下,23.7%的患者只使用非水活性敷料,静脉溃疡(24.0%)比混合性腿部溃疡(20.8%)更常使用敷料。最常用的产品是泡沫敷料(49.7%),其次是纱布敷布(29.5%)。伤口专科医师使用处方的总体比例最高(60.2%),使用非水活性伤口敷料的比例略高。观察到较大的区域差异。结论在德国,腿部溃疡的伤口敷料使用水平较高,且存在明显的区域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Medicine
Wound Medicine Medicine-Surgery
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healing potential of Caiman yacare (Daudin, 1802) visceral fat oil Fibrin sealant for split-thickness skin graft fixation in burn wounds - An ancillary postulated role in scar modulation Graphene-based materials in drug delivery and growth factor release: A critical review Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membranes accelerate open wound healing better than amniotic membranes: A histological study on the proliferation phase Honey based treatment strategies for infected wounds and burns: A systematic review of recent pre-clinical research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1