South Korea’s Strategic Options amid the US–China Strategic Competition Under the Biden Administration

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE East Asian Policy Pub Date : 2021-07-19 DOI:10.1142/s179393052100012x
Hahnkyu Park, C. Yang
{"title":"South Korea’s Strategic Options amid the US–China Strategic Competition Under the Biden Administration","authors":"Hahnkyu Park, C. Yang","doi":"10.1142/s179393052100012x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Korea has so far maintained a “double hedging” strategy—that is, the United States for security, China for economy—in managing its relations with the United States and China. Both Washington and Beijing are recently increasing their pressures on Seoul to join their side, respectively. South Korea needs to re-evaluate its current strategy and adopt a more practical strategy based upon rational calculation of national interests rather than upon political leaders’ ideological beliefs or domestic political considerations.","PeriodicalId":41995,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s179393052100012x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

South Korea has so far maintained a “double hedging” strategy—that is, the United States for security, China for economy—in managing its relations with the United States and China. Both Washington and Beijing are recently increasing their pressures on Seoul to join their side, respectively. South Korea needs to re-evaluate its current strategy and adopt a more practical strategy based upon rational calculation of national interests rather than upon political leaders’ ideological beliefs or domestic political considerations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拜登政府领导下的美中战略竞争中的韩国战略选择
到目前为止,韩国在管理与美国和中国的关系时一直保持着“双重对冲”战略,即美国为安全,中国为经济。华盛顿和北京最近都在加大对首尔的压力,要求他们分别加入自己的阵营。韩国需要重新评估其目前的战略,并在合理计算国家利益的基础上,而不是基于政治领导人的意识形态信仰或国内政治考虑,采取更实际的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Policy
East Asian Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Marcos Administration’s Foreign Policy towards the Great Powers: Seeking the Elusive Balance in Dealing a Changing Indo-Pacific Region Initiative Diplomacy: China’s New Rules for Global Governance, Security and Development Japanese Peacebuilding Diplomacy in Southeast Asia and Beyond in the New World Order The Rise, Fall and (Potential) Rise Again of East Asian Middle Powers Mapping the Scope of China’s Soft Power in Estonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1