The Short-Term Effects of Biomechanical Taping on Upper Extremity Muscles in Unilateral Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Pre-and Post- Experimental Study Protocol

PJAHS Pub Date : 2022-02-15 DOI:10.36413/pjahs.0502.008
V. Dones, C. Rimando, A. J. Co, C. Almazan, M. Capistrano, Kimberly-Anne Enriquez, J. Inarda, M. Quebral, J. A. Rigor, Angelica Supangan
{"title":"The Short-Term Effects of Biomechanical Taping on Upper Extremity\nMuscles in Unilateral Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Pre-and Post-\nExperimental Study Protocol","authors":"V. Dones, C. Rimando, A. J. Co, C. Almazan, M. Capistrano, Kimberly-Anne Enriquez, J. Inarda, M. Quebral, J. A. Rigor, Angelica Supangan","doi":"10.36413/pjahs.0502.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) causes ineffective handgrip due to microtrauma on the elbow's common extensor origin. Objectives: This study will determine the differences in the Extensor Digitorum Communis' (EDC) fascia slide, percentage maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC), static maximum handgrip strength (SMHGT), muscle activation onset time (MAOT) in LE and non-LE elbows, with and without Biomechanical Tape (BMT). The study will determine differences in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores of patients with and without BMT. Methods : Nineteen participants' elbows with unilateral LE with and without BMT will be evaluated using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK) and electromyography (EMG) on Days 1, 3, and 5. A Physiotherapist-Sonographer, a Physiotherapist-EMG user, and a Research Assistant using Jamar hydraulic dynamometer will evaluate the participants. The participants will perform Mill's test during MSK and SMHGT using the dynamometer during EMG. A Chi-squared test will evaluate the relationship between BMT and fascia slide. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA will compare the fascia slide, %MVC, SMHGT, and MAOT between elbows with and without BMT. It will be blocked according to elbow status (i.e., LE, no LE). Dunnett post hoc test will determine the groups whose results differed significantly. Differences in PRTEE scores at Days 1 and 5 will be determined. A p -value <0.05 indicates a significant difference in scores. Expected Results : We expect decreased fascial slide measurements on EDC, VAS, PRTEE scores, and increased %MVC, MAOT, and SMHGT on taped elbows. Results will determine the underpinning mechanism behind the short-term effects of BMT.","PeriodicalId":34443,"journal":{"name":"PJAHS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PJAHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36413/pjahs.0502.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Lateral epicondylalgia (LE) causes ineffective handgrip due to microtrauma on the elbow's common extensor origin. Objectives: This study will determine the differences in the Extensor Digitorum Communis' (EDC) fascia slide, percentage maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC), static maximum handgrip strength (SMHGT), muscle activation onset time (MAOT) in LE and non-LE elbows, with and without Biomechanical Tape (BMT). The study will determine differences in Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scores of patients with and without BMT. Methods : Nineteen participants' elbows with unilateral LE with and without BMT will be evaluated using musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK) and electromyography (EMG) on Days 1, 3, and 5. A Physiotherapist-Sonographer, a Physiotherapist-EMG user, and a Research Assistant using Jamar hydraulic dynamometer will evaluate the participants. The participants will perform Mill's test during MSK and SMHGT using the dynamometer during EMG. A Chi-squared test will evaluate the relationship between BMT and fascia slide. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA will compare the fascia slide, %MVC, SMHGT, and MAOT between elbows with and without BMT. It will be blocked according to elbow status (i.e., LE, no LE). Dunnett post hoc test will determine the groups whose results differed significantly. Differences in PRTEE scores at Days 1 and 5 will be determined. A p -value <0.05 indicates a significant difference in scores. Expected Results : We expect decreased fascial slide measurements on EDC, VAS, PRTEE scores, and increased %MVC, MAOT, and SMHGT on taped elbows. Results will determine the underpinning mechanism behind the short-term effects of BMT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物力学敲击对单侧外侧髁上痛患者上肢肌肉的短期影响:实验前后的研究方案
背景:外侧上髁痛(LE)由于肘部共同伸肌起点的微创手术而导致无效抓握。目的:本研究将确定在使用和不使用生物力学胶带(BMT)的情况下,LE和非LE肘部的指关节伸肌(EDC)筋膜滑动、最大自主收缩百分比(%MVC)、静态最大握力(SMHGT)、肌肉激活起始时间(MAOT)的差异。该研究将确定患有和不患有BMT的患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和患者评分网球肘关节评估(PRTEE)评分的差异。方法:将在第1、3和5天使用肌肉骨骼超声(MSK)和肌电图(EMG)对19名患有单侧LE(伴有和不伴有BMT)的参与者的肘部进行评估。物理治疗师Sonographer、物理治疗师EMG用户和使用Jamar液压测功机的研究助理将对参与者进行评估。参与者将在MSK和SMHGT期间使用EMG期间的测功机进行Mill的测试。卡方检验将评估BMT和筋膜滑动之间的关系。双向重复测量ANOVA将比较带BMT和不带BMT的肘部之间的筋膜滑动、%MVC、SMHGT和MAOT。它将根据弯头状态(即LE,无LE)进行阻塞。Dunnett事后测试将确定结果差异显著的组。将确定第1天和第5天PRTEE评分的差异。p值<0.05表示得分有显著差异。预期结果:我们预计EDC、VAS、PRTEE评分的筋膜滑动测量值会减少,而胶带肘部的%MVC、MAOT和SMHGT会增加。研究结果将决定BMT短期效应背后的支撑机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elements of Realistic Goal-Setting Model Telerehabilitation for Speech-Language Pathology in Community- Based Rehabilitation in the Philippines: A Feasibility Study The Family Therapy Engagement Model (FTEM) Occupational Therapy Models and Practice on Telehealth and Beyond Building Occupational Alliance for Therapy (BOAT) Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1