{"title":"The Blake Renaissance","authors":"Michael Horovitz","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, originally published in 1958, was written to commemorate William\n Blake’s bicentenary. In it, the author observes that Blake has been\n claimed or dismissed by successive generations since his death in 1827: for the\n Romantics, he was a ‘weird crank’, while the Victorians enveloped\n him in ‘their own damp sentimentalism’. The author argues that\n Blake ‘evades appraisal because he was always working for a synthesis of\n creation far beyond outward forms and genres’, which\n meant ‘he had to invent his own methods to express himself\n adequately’. He notes that the recent bicentenary was marked by\n ‘floods of exhibitions, magazine supplements, radio features, new books\n from all sides devoted to him’. This clearly anticipates the Blakean\n explosion of the 1960s, in which the author himself would play a major role.\n This article can therefore be seen as marking the beginning of Sixties Blake in\n Britain.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article, originally published in 1958, was written to commemorate William
Blake’s bicentenary. In it, the author observes that Blake has been
claimed or dismissed by successive generations since his death in 1827: for the
Romantics, he was a ‘weird crank’, while the Victorians enveloped
him in ‘their own damp sentimentalism’. The author argues that
Blake ‘evades appraisal because he was always working for a synthesis of
creation far beyond outward forms and genres’, which
meant ‘he had to invent his own methods to express himself
adequately’. He notes that the recent bicentenary was marked by
‘floods of exhibitions, magazine supplements, radio features, new books
from all sides devoted to him’. This clearly anticipates the Blakean
explosion of the 1960s, in which the author himself would play a major role.
This article can therefore be seen as marking the beginning of Sixties Blake in
Britain.