Who is brave enough to start a new business during the Covid-19 pandemic?

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Baltic Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1108/bjm-11-2022-0414
M. Cowling, O. Dvouletý
{"title":"Who is brave enough to start a new business during the Covid-19 pandemic?","authors":"M. Cowling, O. Dvouletý","doi":"10.1108/bjm-11-2022-0414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSince introducing the UK start-up loan (SUL) Scheme in 2012, 82,809 new start-ups have been supported with loans totalling £759m. Even during the Covid-19 crisis, new business start-ups supported by SUL did not abate. The authors ask whether the entrepreneurs starting businesses during the Covid-19 crisis were different from those becoming entrepreneurs before the pandemic. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned question.Design/methodology/approachThe authors model the differences between pre-Covid-19 business start-ups and Covid-19 start-ups. The administrative data obtained from the UK Government Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) represent information about individual loan records for 82,798 individuals and total lending of £759m between 2012 and 2021. The probit regression model with dependent variable coded one if the start occurred after February 2020 and zero between 2012 and February 2020, was estimated.FindingsThe study’s findings show that both groups of entrepreneurs differ in many facets. The new Covid-19 entrepreneurs are older, more likely to have a graduate-level education and are significantly more likely to make this transition from full-time waged employment or inactivity. Furthermore, they are more likely to set up in manufacturing industries at the business level than their pre-Covid-19 counterparts who favoured service sectors. Finally, their initial lending to support the start-up is much higher.Originality/valueThis study provides value for the policymakers responsible for the administration of the SUL scheme, and it also contributes to the body of knowledge on the effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":46829,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-11-2022-0414","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSince introducing the UK start-up loan (SUL) Scheme in 2012, 82,809 new start-ups have been supported with loans totalling £759m. Even during the Covid-19 crisis, new business start-ups supported by SUL did not abate. The authors ask whether the entrepreneurs starting businesses during the Covid-19 crisis were different from those becoming entrepreneurs before the pandemic. This paper aims to discuss the aforementioned question.Design/methodology/approachThe authors model the differences between pre-Covid-19 business start-ups and Covid-19 start-ups. The administrative data obtained from the UK Government Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) represent information about individual loan records for 82,798 individuals and total lending of £759m between 2012 and 2021. The probit regression model with dependent variable coded one if the start occurred after February 2020 and zero between 2012 and February 2020, was estimated.FindingsThe study’s findings show that both groups of entrepreneurs differ in many facets. The new Covid-19 entrepreneurs are older, more likely to have a graduate-level education and are significantly more likely to make this transition from full-time waged employment or inactivity. Furthermore, they are more likely to set up in manufacturing industries at the business level than their pre-Covid-19 counterparts who favoured service sectors. Finally, their initial lending to support the start-up is much higher.Originality/valueThis study provides value for the policymakers responsible for the administration of the SUL scheme, and it also contributes to the body of knowledge on the effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新冠肺炎大流行期间,谁有足够的勇气创办新企业?
自2012年引入英国创业贷款(SUL)计划以来,已有82,809家初创企业获得了总计7.59亿英镑的贷款支持。即使在新冠肺炎危机期间,SUL支持的新企业也没有减少。作者想知道,在新冠肺炎危机期间创业的企业家与疫情前创业的企业家是否不同。本文旨在对上述问题进行探讨。设计/方法/方法作者模拟了新冠肺炎前创业公司和新冠肺炎创业公司之间的差异。从英国政府商业、能源和工业战略部(BEIS)获得的行政数据代表了2012年至2021年间82798名个人的个人贷款记录信息,总贷款金额为7.59亿英镑。如果开始时间在2020年2月之后,则估计因变量编码为1的probit回归模型,2012年至2020年2月期间为0。研究结果表明,这两组企业家在许多方面存在差异。新冠肺炎企业家年龄较大,更有可能接受过研究生教育,并且更有可能从全职有薪就业或不活动过渡到这种状态。此外,与新冠疫情前倾向于服务行业的同行相比,他们更有可能在商业层面上设立制造业。最后,他们支持初创企业的初始贷款要高得多。独创性/价值本研究为负责管理SUL计划的政策制定者提供了价值,并有助于建立关于全球Covid-19大流行影响的知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Baltic region has experienced rapid political and economic change over recent years. The challenges to managers and management researchers operating within the area are often different to those experienced in other parts of the world. The Baltic Journal of Management contributes to an understanding of different management cultures and provides readers with a fresh look at emerging management practices and research in the countries of the Baltic region and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Age-friendly human resource practices: a comparison of Baltic and Nordic countries Validation of a dispositional critical thinking scale using an original analytical methodology for addressing data from Google Trends Affective states and a firm’s performance: the mediating role of dynamic managerial capabilities Unmasking supplier greenwashing: how information sharing and green trust shape clients’ sustainability Authentic and laissez-faire leadership as drivers of employees well-being: the moderating role of resilience and self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1