Comparison of High-Intensity Resistance and Power Training Programs in Pre-Frail and Frail Older Adults

Justin T. Mierzwicki, Madelyn A. Fox, Kevin R. Griffith, Kelsey M. Harrison, Daryl K. Holstay, Nikki M. Singley
{"title":"Comparison of High-Intensity Resistance and Power Training Programs in Pre-Frail and Frail Older Adults","authors":"Justin T. Mierzwicki, Madelyn A. Fox, Kevin R. Griffith, Kelsey M. Harrison, Daryl K. Holstay, Nikki M. Singley","doi":"10.1080/02703181.2020.1748161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine if high-intensity resistance training or power training is more effective in improving strength and functional outcomes in pre-frail and frail older adults. Methods: Participants underwent a 10-week intervention, two times per week, performing either high-intensity resistance or power training programs. Strength and functional outcome measurements were performed pre and post-intervention, with statistical analyses completed to compare the relative impact of the two interventions. Results: High-intensity resistance training outperformed power training in 4/14 dependent variables; including one repetition maximum strength of three muscle groups, and 30 second sit to stand performance. Power training did not result in statistically greater change relative to high-intensity resistance training in any outcomes measured. Conclusions: Further research comparing the two training methods is necessary to determine which intervention is more effective in impacting frailty, and its associated impairments, in older adults.","PeriodicalId":45387,"journal":{"name":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703181.2020.1748161","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2020.1748161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Aims: The purpose of this study was to determine if high-intensity resistance training or power training is more effective in improving strength and functional outcomes in pre-frail and frail older adults. Methods: Participants underwent a 10-week intervention, two times per week, performing either high-intensity resistance or power training programs. Strength and functional outcome measurements were performed pre and post-intervention, with statistical analyses completed to compare the relative impact of the two interventions. Results: High-intensity resistance training outperformed power training in 4/14 dependent variables; including one repetition maximum strength of three muscle groups, and 30 second sit to stand performance. Power training did not result in statistically greater change relative to high-intensity resistance training in any outcomes measured. Conclusions: Further research comparing the two training methods is necessary to determine which intervention is more effective in impacting frailty, and its associated impairments, in older adults.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体弱和体弱老年人高强度阻力和力量训练方案的比较
摘要目的:本研究的目的是确定高强度阻力训练或力量训练在改善体弱和体弱老年人的力量和功能结局方面是否更有效。方法:参与者接受为期10周的干预,每周两次,执行高强度阻力或力量训练计划。在干预前后进行强度和功能结果测量,并完成统计分析以比较两种干预的相对影响。结果:高强度阻力训练在4/14个因变量上优于力量训练;包括一次重复最大力量的三个肌肉群,以及30秒的坐转站表现。在测量的任何结果中,力量训练与高强度阻力训练相比没有统计学上更大的变化。结论:有必要进一步研究比较两种训练方法,以确定哪种干预对老年人的虚弱及其相关损伤更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: This comprehensive journal is recognized for its useful balance of research and clinical practice articles. For more than twenty five years Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics has functioned as a forum for allied health professionals as well as others with a focus on rehabilitation of the geriatric client to share information, clinical experience, research, and therapeutic practice. Each issue focuses on current practice and emerging issues in the care of the older client, including rehabilitation and long-term care in institutional and community settings, and innovative programming; the entire range of problems experienced by the elderly; and the current skills needed for working with older clients.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac Autonomic Modulation and Lower Limbs Resistance Exercise in Healthy Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study Punching Parkinson’s: The Experience of No-Contact Boxing among Older Adults Living with Parkinson’s Disease The Prompt Impact of Health Promotion Activities by Utilizing Online Group Exercises on Community-Dwelling Older People with Psychological Depression The Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Physical Activity in Rehabilitation Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Do Personality Traits Predict Mobility Outcomes among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Nigeria?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1