R. Spinelli, N. Magagnotti, Barnabáš Kováč, Patrik Heger, Dávid Heilig, B. Heil, G. Kovacs, M. Mihelič
{"title":"A cost-benefit analysis of pre-sorting using a feller-buncher in underdeveloped short rotation poplar plantations","authors":"R. Spinelli, N. Magagnotti, Barnabáš Kováč, Patrik Heger, Dávid Heilig, B. Heil, G. Kovacs, M. Mihelič","doi":"10.1080/14942119.2022.2107863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Underdeveloped tree crops (⩽ 30 bone-dry tons ha−1) offer a main harvest of biomass-trees, which lack the size and the form for producing a log. However, about 1/3 of the available stems may yield at least one log, which could significantly increase the overall value of the harvest. Under those circumstances, it may make sense to sort log-trees from biomass-trees at an early stage, rather than having a harvester or a processor go through all of the treesonly to toss almost 70 out of 100 trees into the biomass pile. The Authors set up a controlled experiment to quantify the eventual benefit obtained by early pre-sorting, performed by the feller-buncher. Pre-sorting resulted in a 15% productivity loss for the feller-buncher, which was repaid by a 100% productivity increase for the processor. Considering the different hourly cost of the two machines, three Euros were saved for each additional Euro invested in pre-sorting. Pre-sorting made whole-tree harvesting (WTH) a significantly cheaper option than cut-to-length (CTL) , whereas the two systems would be almost equally expensive when no pre-sorting was applied. Pre-sorting would also facilitate multiple-tree delimbing, implemented through the introduction of a chainflail; that is likely to further reduce harvesting cost, returning financial viability to the harvesting of underdeveloped plantations.","PeriodicalId":55998,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"34 1","pages":"90 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2022.2107863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
ABSTRACT Underdeveloped tree crops (⩽ 30 bone-dry tons ha−1) offer a main harvest of biomass-trees, which lack the size and the form for producing a log. However, about 1/3 of the available stems may yield at least one log, which could significantly increase the overall value of the harvest. Under those circumstances, it may make sense to sort log-trees from biomass-trees at an early stage, rather than having a harvester or a processor go through all of the treesonly to toss almost 70 out of 100 trees into the biomass pile. The Authors set up a controlled experiment to quantify the eventual benefit obtained by early pre-sorting, performed by the feller-buncher. Pre-sorting resulted in a 15% productivity loss for the feller-buncher, which was repaid by a 100% productivity increase for the processor. Considering the different hourly cost of the two machines, three Euros were saved for each additional Euro invested in pre-sorting. Pre-sorting made whole-tree harvesting (WTH) a significantly cheaper option than cut-to-length (CTL) , whereas the two systems would be almost equally expensive when no pre-sorting was applied. Pre-sorting would also facilitate multiple-tree delimbing, implemented through the introduction of a chainflail; that is likely to further reduce harvesting cost, returning financial viability to the harvesting of underdeveloped plantations.