Tom M. Statham, Richard Sumner, A. F. Hill, Jonathan W. N. Smith
{"title":"Transition from active remediation to natural source zone depletion (NSZD) at a LNAPL-impacted site, supported by sustainable remediation appraisal","authors":"Tom M. Statham, Richard Sumner, A. F. Hill, Jonathan W. N. Smith","doi":"10.1144/qjegh2022-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural source zone depletion (NSZD) is increasingly being considered as a risk-management option at sites impacted with light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). NSZD can be applied in isolation or in combination with active remediation techniques, depending on site-specific risk management requirements. A case study of the transition from active remediation to passive NSZD is presented for a petroleum impacted site in northwest Europe. This transition was supported by multiple lines of evidence/management options including: the introduction of institutional controls on groundwater and land development restrictions, the results from a residual-NAPL risk assessment, monitoring to establish that the LNAPL plume is reducing in size, LNAPL transmissivity assessment, a CO2 equivalent assessment of remediation options, and a LNAPL recovery diminishing returns model. Through application of local sustainable remediation principles consistent with ISO / SuRF-UK sustainable remediation frameworks and tools, regulatory approval was obtained for a partial closeout of the remediation system. By the final year of operation, NSZD rates in the portion of the site on which transition to NSZD has been agreed were over three times greater than active LNAPL recovery rates (12,000 L/ha/a for NSZD; 3,800 L/ha/a for active LNAPL recovery). At the remaining active remediation areas total fluids extraction currently out-performs NSZD and will be continued until a comparable point is reached when NSZD removal exceeds active remediation. At that point transition to NSZD alone will be considered as the most sustainable risk-based approach.","PeriodicalId":20937,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2022-140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural source zone depletion (NSZD) is increasingly being considered as a risk-management option at sites impacted with light non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL). NSZD can be applied in isolation or in combination with active remediation techniques, depending on site-specific risk management requirements. A case study of the transition from active remediation to passive NSZD is presented for a petroleum impacted site in northwest Europe. This transition was supported by multiple lines of evidence/management options including: the introduction of institutional controls on groundwater and land development restrictions, the results from a residual-NAPL risk assessment, monitoring to establish that the LNAPL plume is reducing in size, LNAPL transmissivity assessment, a CO2 equivalent assessment of remediation options, and a LNAPL recovery diminishing returns model. Through application of local sustainable remediation principles consistent with ISO / SuRF-UK sustainable remediation frameworks and tools, regulatory approval was obtained for a partial closeout of the remediation system. By the final year of operation, NSZD rates in the portion of the site on which transition to NSZD has been agreed were over three times greater than active LNAPL recovery rates (12,000 L/ha/a for NSZD; 3,800 L/ha/a for active LNAPL recovery). At the remaining active remediation areas total fluids extraction currently out-performs NSZD and will be continued until a comparable point is reached when NSZD removal exceeds active remediation. At that point transition to NSZD alone will be considered as the most sustainable risk-based approach.
期刊介绍:
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology is owned by the Geological Society of London and published by the Geological Society Publishing House.
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology (QJEGH) is an established peer reviewed international journal featuring papers on geology as applied to civil engineering mining practice and water resources. Papers are invited from, and about, all areas of the world on engineering geology and hydrogeology topics. This includes but is not limited to: applied geophysics, engineering geomorphology, environmental geology, hydrogeology, groundwater quality, ground source heat, contaminated land, waste management, land use planning, geotechnics, rock mechanics, geomaterials and geological hazards.
The journal publishes the prestigious Glossop and Ineson lectures, research papers, case studies, review articles, technical notes, photographic features, thematic sets, discussion papers, editorial opinion and book reviews.