Fetal distress, options of anesthesia, and immediate postdelivery outcome at state specialist hospital Akure

R. Omotayo, O. Akinsowon, E. Bello, O. Akadiri, A. Akintan, S. Omotayo
{"title":"Fetal distress, options of anesthesia, and immediate postdelivery outcome at state specialist hospital Akure","authors":"R. Omotayo, O. Akinsowon, E. Bello, O. Akadiri, A. Akintan, S. Omotayo","doi":"10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_66_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: When abnormalities of the fetal heart rate are recognized promptly and dealt with, asphyxia and therefore perinatal morbidity and mortality can be reduced. The objective of fetal monitoring during labor is the prediction and diagnosis of fetal asphyxia before fetal/newborn morbidity with particular reference to brain damage occurs. Fetal distress is one of the conditions in which the obstetrician is required to hasten the process of delivery. This urgency is also usually transferred to the anesthetists, whereas the burden of adverse fetal outcome falls squarely on the pediatrician. Objective: This study found out the form of anesthesia mostly used for caesarean sections (CS) in cases of fetal distress, its appropriateness in terms of achieving management goals, and advantages over the other form of anesthesia. Study Design: This study is a retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Records of patients that had caesarean section for suspected fetal distress over a period of 5 years were reviewed. The fetal status at the point of making diagnosis, type of anesthesia used, suite-arrival-incision-interval, and the baby's condition after surgery were retrieved from the case notes. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Frequencies and proportions of data from the type-of-anesthesia groups were compared. Variables were compared for significance using Chi-square. Results: Most of the surgeries for fetal distress were done under spinal anesthesia in 90% of the patients. Suite arrival-to-incision interval which is largely affected by type of anesthesia was within 1 h 30 min in 91.6% of those that had spinal anesthesia compared to 100% for those that had general anesthesia (GA). P value = 0.000. APGAR score of <4 was more in neonates delivered with GA (61.1%) than those delivered with spinal anesthesia (14.5%). Percentage of neonatal admission into special care baby unit (SCBU) was more in those that had GA (85%) than those that had spinal anesthesia (14%). Conclusion: The predominant type of anesthesia used for caesarean section for fetal distress from this study was spinal anesthesia which had better neonatal outcome.","PeriodicalId":23302,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/TJOG.TJOG_66_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: When abnormalities of the fetal heart rate are recognized promptly and dealt with, asphyxia and therefore perinatal morbidity and mortality can be reduced. The objective of fetal monitoring during labor is the prediction and diagnosis of fetal asphyxia before fetal/newborn morbidity with particular reference to brain damage occurs. Fetal distress is one of the conditions in which the obstetrician is required to hasten the process of delivery. This urgency is also usually transferred to the anesthetists, whereas the burden of adverse fetal outcome falls squarely on the pediatrician. Objective: This study found out the form of anesthesia mostly used for caesarean sections (CS) in cases of fetal distress, its appropriateness in terms of achieving management goals, and advantages over the other form of anesthesia. Study Design: This study is a retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Records of patients that had caesarean section for suspected fetal distress over a period of 5 years were reviewed. The fetal status at the point of making diagnosis, type of anesthesia used, suite-arrival-incision-interval, and the baby's condition after surgery were retrieved from the case notes. Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Frequencies and proportions of data from the type-of-anesthesia groups were compared. Variables were compared for significance using Chi-square. Results: Most of the surgeries for fetal distress were done under spinal anesthesia in 90% of the patients. Suite arrival-to-incision interval which is largely affected by type of anesthesia was within 1 h 30 min in 91.6% of those that had spinal anesthesia compared to 100% for those that had general anesthesia (GA). P value = 0.000. APGAR score of <4 was more in neonates delivered with GA (61.1%) than those delivered with spinal anesthesia (14.5%). Percentage of neonatal admission into special care baby unit (SCBU) was more in those that had GA (85%) than those that had spinal anesthesia (14%). Conclusion: The predominant type of anesthesia used for caesarean section for fetal distress from this study was spinal anesthesia which had better neonatal outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家专科医院Akure的胎儿窘迫,麻醉选择和产后立即结局
背景:当胎儿心率异常得到及时识别和处理时,窒息以及围产期发病率和死亡率可以降低。分娩期间胎儿监测的目的是在胎儿/新生儿发病之前预测和诊断胎儿窒息,特别是脑损伤。胎儿窘迫是产科医生需要加快分娩过程的情况之一。这种紧迫感通常也会转移到麻醉师身上,而胎儿不良结局的负担则完全落在儿科医生身上。目的:本研究发现了在胎儿窘迫的情况下剖腹产(CS)最常用的麻醉形式,它在实现管理目标方面的适当性,以及与其他形式的麻醉相比的优势。研究设计:本研究为回顾性描述性横断面研究。材料和方法:回顾5年来因疑似胎儿窘迫而剖腹产的患者的记录。从病例记录中检索诊断时的胎儿状态、使用的麻醉类型、套房到达切口间隔以及婴儿手术后的状况。数据采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)20.0版进行分析。比较了麻醉组数据的频率和比例。使用卡方比较变量的显著性。结果:90%的胎儿窘迫手术是在脊柱麻醉下进行的。在脊柱麻醉的患者中,91.6%的患者在1小时30分钟内到达切口间隔,而全身麻醉的患者为100%,这在很大程度上受麻醉类型的影响。P值=0.000。采用GA分娩的新生儿APGAR评分<4分(61.1%)高于采用脊髓麻醉分娩的新生儿(14.5%)。采用GA的新生儿入住特殊护理婴儿病房(SCBU)的百分比(85%)高于采用脊柱麻醉的新生儿(14%)。结论:本研究中用于剖宫产治疗胎儿窘迫的主要麻醉类型是脊柱麻醉,它有更好的新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trends in vaginal hysterectomy in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A 14-year review Risk factors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Abuja, Nigeria: A prospective case-control study A randomized controlled trial of rectal diclofenac sodium and intramuscular pentazocine versus intramuscular pentazocine, diclofenac, and paracetamol analgesics for pain relief in the first 48 h after cesarean section Incidence and determinants of pregnancy among women receiving HAART in Simiyu region: 14-year retrospective follow-up A case of Couvelaire uterus with coagulation dysfunction saved successfully with SR PPH suction cannula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1